KanaPostsonKiwi
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2018
Yeah, it makes sense they go after the big fish, worshipping them for their bigness to get the community talking about them. Not that there's anything wrong in the big fish, they're successful, but every whale has a few parasites.
League of Legends balance team is literally the players, and how loudly they whine on the forums about the champs after they drop. I think the champ design team don't do much at all in terms of balancing before just throwing things out. A few champs are still broken in a few chosen roles. To this day the only champion that wasn't slightly overtweaked on release was Yorick, and he's also the only champion that didn't get a significant nerf in the patch immediately following.
That being said, to be fair, it's a highly skill based game, and even if you get to design a champ around what you perceive is your own skillset, you might still play it in a shitty way and someone can just double its effectiveness by doing something else. You kind of need the huge masses to test the champs.
I never thought i'd reach low diamond on what started off as a joke duo bot of Mundo and Gragas (Mundo being supportive), but hey, sometimes stupid shit works in this game. If anyone remembers Moscow 5, they're practically the forerunners of stupid shit that works.
As for the EC video, i vaguely remember them putting some pants-on-head-retarded line of how the imbalance of champions is intentional. Which technically would make sense if the game's items and champion set would be completely static with no new champions filtering in, but all new champions and items are going to change how portions of the game play.
EDIT: Looks like things are moving up from community to Youtube
League of Legends balance team is literally the players, and how loudly they whine on the forums about the champs after they drop. I think the champ design team don't do much at all in terms of balancing before just throwing things out. A few champs are still broken in a few chosen roles. To this day the only champion that wasn't slightly overtweaked on release was Yorick, and he's also the only champion that didn't get a significant nerf in the patch immediately following.
That being said, to be fair, it's a highly skill based game, and even if you get to design a champ around what you perceive is your own skillset, you might still play it in a shitty way and someone can just double its effectiveness by doing something else. You kind of need the huge masses to test the champs.
I never thought i'd reach low diamond on what started off as a joke duo bot of Mundo and Gragas (Mundo being supportive), but hey, sometimes stupid shit works in this game. If anyone remembers Moscow 5, they're practically the forerunners of stupid shit that works.
As for the EC video, i vaguely remember them putting some pants-on-head-retarded line of how the imbalance of champions is intentional. Which technically would make sense if the game's items and champion set would be completely static with no new champions filtering in, but all new champions and items are going to change how portions of the game play.
EDIT: Looks like things are moving up from community to Youtube
Last edited: