🐱 People are mad about ‘Ghostbusters’ again

CatParty
https://www.dailydot.com/parsec/new-ghostbusters-sequel-backlash/

Director Jason Reitman revealed on Tuesday that he was called to direct and co-write an upcoming new Ghostbusters movie that follows the original 1984 film directed by his own father, Ivan Reitman, Entertainment Weekly reports. “Finally got the keys to the car,” Jason tweeted.

But before you can say “who ya gonna call?” the backlash percolated online.

In a few months, Sony Pictures plans to begin shooting the film slated for a summer 2020 release, with the older Reitman as producer this time.

“This is the next chapter in the original franchise. It is not a reboot. What happened in the ‘80s happened in the ‘80s, and this is set in the present day,” Jason told EW. “We have a lot of wonderful surprises and new characters for the audience to meet,” he continued.

It’s too early to tell who’s part of the cast, who will be the new characters, and what the plot will be about. However, it’s also highly unlikely the original actors like Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, and Ernie Hudson will star.

Meanwhile, Jason has reportedly “begun testing teenagers for four mystery roles,” according to sources, says Variety. Sources cited by the Hollywood Reporter even went so far as to say he’s looking to cast two boys and two girls. The project was supposedly so covert, the studio even used fake title “Rust City” to “keep the news under wraps until plans were ready to be unveiled,” Varietyadds.

One thing’s for sure, according to EW: It won’t be related to Sony Pictures’ 2016 all-female Ghostbusters reboot directed by Paul Feig, and which starred Kate McKinnon, Leslie Jones, Kristen Wiig, and Melissa McCarthy.

Even with very little information about the new installment in the famous franchise, already, Tuesday’s announcement of a Ghostbusters “sequel” did not sit well with users on Twitter for different reasons.

For starters, a lot of people are disappointed the all-female reboot is not slated for a sequel.

upload_2019-1-16_8-6-52.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-7-9.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-7-21.png

What upsets some is how it appears that Ghostbusters’ producers are pandering to people (read: sexist males and other haters) who didn’t want the all-female reboot in the first place, and who will then consider this “winning”:

upload_2019-1-16_8-7-50.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-8-4.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-8-17.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-9-23.png


As to be expected, a lot are calling this reboot unnecessary, and even self-proclaimed fans of the entire Ghostbustersfranchise are among them. As @gracerandolph tweets, “So what if it’s in the same ‘universe’?! If new #Ghostbusters doesn’t star #BillMurray #DanAkroyd #ErnieHudson #SigourneyWeaver … nobody cares.”
The only apparent good news this time around: At least the backlash to the latest installment isn’t as sexist.

As a Ghostbusters fan since childhood, I’ll leave this here: “The Ghostbusters universe is big enough to hold a lot of different stories,” Reitman told EW. I daresay truly devoted fans will watch any iteration of this classic.
 
They became really risk-adverse at the turn of the millennium. I don't know why, but, they started just issuing sequels to threadbare IPs exclusively at that point.
There's one very clear reason: Star Wars. The autistic fanjerking over the prequels and the money that was made because of it, even despite the very clear and obvious critical reaction from fans and casuals alike that these films weren't very good, told Hollywood all they needed to know about what path to take their creative direction for the rest of time.
 
There's one very clear reason: Star Wars. The autistic fanjerking over the prequels and the money that was made because of it, even despite the very clear and obvious critical reaction from fans and casuals alike that these films weren't very good, told Hollywood all they needed to know about what path to take their creative direction for the rest of time.
she Prequels were made by an unsupervised autist...
 
Can we just make a new IP, or is my generation entirely devoid of creativity?
Sadly, yes. Creativity seems to have taken a back seat to trying to milk nostalgia out of Gen-X and Millennials.

This is Disney's major release schedule for 2018 and 2019 combined. Disney is literally the largest monopoly of studios and movie houses and has the widest resource pool available for talent and creativity.

There isn't a single new IP on here that hasn't been done before. Arguably, Artemis Fowl is an existing book series and not an original IP, they just bought the rights.

Fz46dTO.jpg


Much like the AAA gaming industry, New IP's are a rarity when the cash cow is nostalgic, familiar universes... seemingly no matter how badly they butcher them.
 
Four teenagers you say? Sounds like Extreme Ghostbusters
View attachment 640922

Look at that D I V E R S I T Y.

2 boys and 2 girls? Well if it had to be any of them, the one in the black one is going to get gender-flipped. Hollywood loves black wimmins.

But for real though, holy shit that salt. Can we just make a new IP, or is my generation entirely devoid of creativity?

I'll be honest, the thought of a live action Extreme Ghostbusters movie isn't too bad. It was a pretty alright spin-off series in it's own right and it didn't make a big deal out it's #diverse cast of characters. Of course, it would inevitably be ruined by the modern political landscape but it's fun to speculate on how it'd be done in the hands of a genuine creative mind.
 
Sadly, yes. Creativity seems to have taken a back seat to trying to tard cum nostalgia out of Gen-X and Millennials.

This is Disney's major release schedule for 2018 and 2019 combined. Disney is literally the largest monopoly of studios and movie houses and has the widest resource pool available for talent and creativity.

There isn't a single new IP on here that hasn't been done before. Arguably, Artemis Fowl is an existing book series and not an original IP, they just bought the rights.

Fz46dTO.jpg


Much like the AAA gaming industry, New IP's are a rarity when the cash cow is nostalgic, familiar universes... seemingly no matter how badly they butcher them.

remakes are not a new thing. the most popular wizard of oz was 8th remake of that story lol
 
Sadly, yes. Creativity seems to have taken a back seat to trying to tard cum nostalgia out of Gen-X and Millennials.

This is Disney's major release schedule for 2018 and 2019 combined. Disney is literally the largest monopoly of studios and movie houses and has the widest resource pool available for talent and creativity.

There isn't a single new IP on here that hasn't been done before. Arguably, Artemis Fowl is an existing book series and not an original IP, they just bought the rights.

Fz46dTO.jpg


Much like the AAA gaming industry, New IP's are a rarity when the cash cow is nostalgic, familiar universes... seemingly no matter how badly they butcher them.

I think part of the issue is the way technology has advanced and the way media is now. We have SOOOO MANY OPTIONS for consuming media with many devices we can have right at our finger tips.

The entertainment industry is competing for our attention more now than ever before, and something new and unfamiliar mostly likely isn't going grab people. Something we know though? Something we have a history with? Yeah, that'll be guaranteed to attract eyeballs.

I mean look at Star Trek Discovery. Literally everyone I've talked to about the show has said the same thing "It isn't Star Trek. It would be a better show if they just didn't call it Star Trek". So why is it called Star Trek? Because they knew the brand would lure people into watching it. Simple as that.
 
I'll be honest, the thought of a live action Extreme Ghostbusters movie isn't too bad. It was a pretty alright spin-off series in it's own right and it didn't make a big deal out it's #diverse cast of characters. Of course, it would inevitably be ruined by the modern political landscape but it's fun to speculate on how it'd be done in the hands of a genuine creative mind.
Who would play Egon though?
 
Why be creative and take a risk when you can press the reboot button and print money?

That's the problem, they've accepted that hitting the button is a guaranteed $x, because even if whittled down to the hardest of hardcore fans who will overlook bad acting, bad writing, sloppy computer generated explosionfests and virtual signaling gurrl powah! characters, the audience is still there for a profit, however meager compared to the investment.
 
I wonder when an Expert System will be perfected that'll just absorb the 120+ years of extant film and make, based on tweaks and input, just spit out "new" movies.

"Hey, Bob, remember those comic book movies that were popular around the turn of the century? The committee for public entertainment has decided to revive those, can you grab your data-tablet and create a few dozen before midday break? Thank you."
 
I especially like AdriOfTheDead's tweet up there. "All male Ghostbusters cast, what kind of pandering shit is this?". That tweet is literally the "I sleep/real shit" meme personified. Not the be captain obvious, but I bet these same people thought exact similar backlash against the all female cast was the most misogynistic thing ever.
 
Back