Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[break these cuffs]

It'll probably bite him in the ass more than save face, warning shots aren't legal in California. If (((they))) don't hire him a hardcore lawyer he's probably getting deported

I don't know of anywhere in the US, or abroad for the military, where warning shots are legal or part of official standard operating procedure. Not saying they aren't as I don't care to know every state's laws regarding self defense, but it would be out of the norm. Authorities in charge of disciplinary actions, like a DA, may overlook the illegality of a warning shot when performed in good faith, but one thing is made very clear in any and all education for private citizens, police, and military I have heard of; the only time you shoot someone is when your life or someone else's life is in imminent danger and you shoot to kill. Someone is trying to kill you, you kill them. This is the cornerstone lethal self defense in the US. Cops and the military have all kinds of non-lethal options and escalation of force SOPs ingrained in them. You may think you're doing the right thing by firing warning shots or shooting to wound in order to spare a life, but you're opening yourself to rash of shit criminally and civilly.

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

Gay man Youtuber in the UK quits using the non-binary label after 4 years of identifying as NB, describes the toxicity of online NBs:

I mean... I guess the outcome is good, but... the logic is nonsense. If it's your "identity" and you are a certain way, what difference does the community make? No gay dude (at least I've never seen it) says "Well, you know, I was really liking sucking the cocks, but those other gay dudes were too catty for me, so I'm straight now"

 

[AnOminous]

I mean... I guess the outcome is good, but... the logic is nonsense. If it's your "identity" and you are a certain way, what difference does the community make? No gay dude (at least I've never seen it) says "Well, you know, I was really liking sucking the cocks, but those other gay dudes were too catty for me, so I'm straight now"

Well, enby is just made up bullshit. It is nobody's actual identity. It is just some shit you say to force people to do a dumb little verbal dance and use some dumb pronoun you made up, so you can feel important and like you get to control people.

People don't stop being gay and sucking the cock and taking it up the ass because it becomes unfashionable.

Somehow this is completely the case with this enby nonsense.

 

[Mr. A. L. Mao]

terves are passing this one around today. they say watch out guys, they are finally coming for us.

glad i'm married. you straight unmarried guys gonna have some splainin to do. transphobes!

https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/3kgvab/transgender-sex-chasers-cisgender-men

I'm single this Valentine’s Day, and I feel like shit. I feel undesirable, and I feel powerless to change that. Most of all, I want to know why the guys I crush on, namely cis, straight, male 20-somethings, won’t fuck me. So I slid into the only thing I could: their DMs.

My friends warned me about writing this column on why my crushes won’t crush me back. They said the guys I like won’t fuck me because they’re straight. He’s—you know—into women, they said, the transphobia as thinly veiled as a penis in a lambskin condom. My friends were implying that heterosexuality is male attraction to women—and I just don’t make the cut.

that's you fellas. you will not date this tranny & who do you think you are?

Simply, some say desire is a predetermined variable, while others find it to be something in which we are inculcated. But we also know that desire is flexible: for example, trans girls’ (and more broadly, trans people’s) sexual attractions often change after starting transition. And when studies support the obvious—that most cis people, queer and straight alike, wouldn’t date trans folks—I’m left wondering what it would take for someone to want to fuck me.

To be clear, whatever the indecipherable mechanics of male lust may be, it’s not that boys as a category won’t fuck me. (Grindr begs to differ.) Rather, it’s that I, along with many other trans girls, are quick to label guys who openly and eagerly desire us as “chasers,” a pejorative used for suitors who see trans women as a part-time kink or a full-time game. So, I quickly write off these sexual solicitors. Instead, I thirst for the boys who have only ever chased cis girls. It’s these guys who won’t fuck me.

he's talking to YOU!

When a straight guy says he is not into me, nor other trans women, I feel butthurt–emotionally and, unfortunately, not physically. Smart girls would just walk away and actually find someone who is into them. My desire is just as biased as these men’s. I don’t want to find others. I want them.

I may come off as a bit aggressive posing the question, Why won’t you fuck me?It may even sound that I feel entitled to their desire. Wouldn’t it be lovely to have fucking be a human right? Alas, it’s not, and it cannot be. Desire is not enforceable, nor can it conform to our politics. Some feminists might diagnose these guys’ desire with a bad case of transphobia (and probably all sorts of other social biases). I mean, it would be pretty cool if a Trans 101 was the new Viagra, if #TransIsBeautiful could be a command, and not just an affirmation.

But the idea that not desiring trans women is transphobic mistakes desire for rationality. You don’t want because you know; you want because you feel. Brains can understand that trans women are women–but a boner only knows the five senses. If I was a Good Feminist, after all, I would be fucking other trans women by now.

unfortunately there's more.

edit: Jenn Smith suspended permanently from twitter last night; the Ogre wins.

if UR on twitter, u might want to follow this account in 'solidarity'.
@JennerSmith6

"Have gay sex with me or you're a bigot!"
Lmao that'll sure go over well for your average straight guy, fucking trooncels man

 

[Machinist]

When a straight guy says he is not into me, nor other trans women, I feel butthurt–emotionally and, unfortunately, not physically. Smart girls would just walk away and actually find someone who is into them. My desire is just as biased as these men’s. I don’t want to find others. I want them.

This troon is practically buffalo bill from silence of the lambs, why do people let them get away with these levels of unwarranted self importance?

 

[break these cuffs]

This troon is practically buffalo bill from silence of the lambs, why do people let them get away with these levels of unwarranted self importance?

Take a look at a calendar you bigot.

 

[Übertroon]

But we also know that desire is flexible:

Did someone say "conversion therapy"?

 

[Machinist]

Did someone say "conversion therapy

 

[Buer]

Trancels and their supporters are ridiculous. They think that because the identify as women and see themselves as women that straight men will/should suddenly want them. They also think straight men only like cis women because of secondary female characteristics and not because of those characteristics and that they have a functioning vagina. They think that because they don't care about the person they like's genitals that anyone they want to date/fuck shouldn't either. And that's not how it works at all.

 

[Easypeas]

Trancels and their supporters are ridiculous. They think that because the identify as women and see themselves as women that straight men will/should suddenly want them. They also think straight men only like cis women because of secondary female characteristics and not because of those characteristics and that they have a functioning vagina. They think that because they don't care about the person they like's genitals that anyone they want to date/fuck shouldn't either. And that's not how it works at all.

While it's true there are more Kinsey 1&2s hiding among straight people than 4&5s among the gays, and straight men could be accused of liking femininity more than females, it's interesting how much of the trans narrative shifted in recent years. These are still presumably homosexual trans women. But for decades trans women were annoyed with straight men attracted to them, wary of bi-curious men who've always wanted to experiment with dick but were afraid of being gay, who saw trans women as the best of both worlds. Now they're almost indistinguishable from their transcel counterparts harassing lesbians for a screw. Blanchard and Bailey thought gay men also transitioned for easier access to sex, I guess we never took that as seriously.

 

[AnOminous]

Blanchard and Bailey thought gay men also transitioned for easier access to sex, I guess we never took that as seriously.

I don't think we can treat transgender people who were the subject of early studies as even being the same population as the current creeps and perverts.

Anyone who transitioned back when it was incredibly taboo and socially frowned on was probably actually serious about it.

Attention whores who suddenly transition in huge numbers when it's fashionable are just bullshit artists. Pretty much any of these assholes, especially the ones who use slurs like "truscum" and "transmedicalists," are just bullying real trans people because they want to be the center of attention.

 

[Silence of the Troons]

I hope this fits here (I wasn't able to find an article about it, not even in Spanish) https://twitter.com/mrqztrinidad/status/1096616666555969536 https://old.reddit.com/r/GenderCrit...attacks_a_radical_feminist_before_her_speech/

This happened today in a assembly (or forum, idk) in preparation to our protest march for International Women's Day in Argentina. Before two known GC feminists were able to do their speech, and after hours and hours of forced delays, one transgender women attacked the girl with the mic and tried to choke her. The rest is chaotic, as you can see.

To put it in context: the "majority" of the assembly, in a previous gathering, prohibited any "terf" or "transphobic" speech today. But this coalition -Bloque Abolicionista or Abolitionist Group- (from two different radfem groups) tried to speak about women trafficking cases and abolition of prostitution here in Argentina, but not about gender or any other radical ideas.

But even with that plan they received a lot of hate because they were "known TERFs". And the predominant feminist group there is pro-regulation of prostitution, which yelled "TERF" and "transphobics" at them just because their ideas don't align.

>Trying to choke someone who disagrees with you
Nice

 

[break these cuffs]

I hope this fits here (I wasn't able to find an article about it, not even in Spanish) https://twitter.com/mrqztrinidad/status/1096616666555969536 https://old.reddit.com/r/GenderCrit...attacks_a_radical_feminist_before_her_speech/>Trying to choke someone who disagrees with you
Nice

lol, look at how he towers over the women there and how pathetically he fights. Someone with that kind of reach and height advantage should be laying motherfuckers out.

 

[Otterly]

Came here to post that IWD/Argentina link.

That bloke is HUGE. When you see footage like this it just shows you how little chance 99% of women have against a man who attacks them. Why isn’t footage like this making everyone who sees it say ‘that’s a man, a big man, attacking a woman.’

She’s lucky she’s Ok. It takes very little pressure in just the right place to kill, or dislodge a bit of arterial plaque which would cause a stroke. He should be done for at least GBH (or whatever the equivalent is there) OH WAIT NO there’s a fucking LAW against prosecuting any man who identifies as a woman for gender based violence. What the actual fuck?

And I thought the Uk was a basket case. I despair. I genuinely think that women are going to end up as domestic pets, stripped down for spare wombs and used as surrogates. It’s like some horrible nightmare. I’d like to wake up back in the 90s please, where men weren’t trooning out and the music was better.

Can I emigrate to the USA?

 

[Stoneheart]

Trancels and their supporters are ridiculous. They think that because the identify as women and see themselves as women that straight men will/should suddenly want them. They also think straight men only like cis women because of secondary female characteristics and not because of those characteristics and that they have a functioning vagina. They think that because they don't care about the person they like's genitals that anyone they want to date/fuck shouldn't either. And that's not how it works at all.

A functioning Vagina isnt that important, who cares if the woman is barren or on birth controll? also secondary female characteristics are very important, just ask any poor girl without tits...

 

[queue-anon]

Trancels and their supporters are ridiculous. They think that because the identify as women and see themselves as women that straight men will/should suddenly want them. They also think straight men only like cis women because of secondary female characteristics and not because of those characteristics and that they have a functioning vagina. They think that because they don't care about the person they like's genitals that anyone they want to date/fuck shouldn't either. And that's not how it works at all.

Straight men should avoid troons under the "don't stick your dick in crazy" maxim.

So much entitlement, holy shit. Whatever happened to "no means no?" Oh, right, it's a troon, so its sexual kinks come first and everyone else must accommodate.

It still blows me away that people can think like this. "Why won't you have sex with me?!‽" "Because I'm not attracted to you." "Bigot!" How on earth does he think scolding people will compel them to suddenly turn gay, get horny and get to work?

If I already don't want to have sex with you and then you start calling me names and demanding sex from me, I'm going to pick up a blunt object to make my feelings clear if you don't stop. If this guy got his ass kicked by one of his own friends for acting like this, I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest.

I can't imagine why a straight guy who has a best friend he's been doing dudely things with (pissing in jars, ffs, which also means this troon has a dick and his crush has probably seen it) wouldn't want to fuck his bro.

This troon is practically buffalo bill from silence of the lambs, why do people let them get away with these levels of unwarranted self importance?

What's pathetic is that this troon clearly wants to be the hot girl that supposedly every dude wants, and I can't help but assume that this is one reason transcels are so obsessed with straight men. Part of it is their creepy sexual entitlement, but I also think it's because straight dudes not wanting them destroys their little fantasy about being the hot chick. Never mind that the vast majority of women aren't the hot chick and that being the hot chick isn't all it's cracked up to be. You get ten times as much harassment, and most people don't take you seriously where you need to be taken seriously, like at work.

I also laughed when I looked up a picture of him that actually shows his face. He's not ugly but he's also not hot. He'll never be the "girl" every dude wants, and, if he were actually a woman, he would have learned that and gotten used to it at least a decade ago.

 

[Ahriman]

Possibly old - I can't keep up with this thread sometimes

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/...y-assaults-10-year-ol?utm_content=buffer27d2c

IT
KEEPS
HAPPENING!!!!!

 

[AnOminous]

Possibly old - I can't keep up with this thread sometimes

View attachment 667945
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/...y-assaults-10-year-ol?utm_content=buffer27d2c

IT
KEEPS
HAPPENING!!!!!

So when is the 10 year old getting arrested for transphobic hate crimes?

 

[one_time_user]

Possibly old - I can't keep up with this thread sometimes

View attachment 667945
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/...y-assaults-10-year-ol?utm_content=buffer27d2c

IT
KEEPS
HAPPENING!!!!!

it does not keep happening the last time it happened was when we were at war with Oceania. And we have never been at war with Oceania.

and if you disagree, we'll take you around the corner for Tiffani and Venus to re-educate you.

 

[Silence of the Troons]

Cross post from the Rhys "Rachel" McKinnon thread – Marina Navrátilová recently published an opinion piece in The Times where she blasts McKinnon https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...x?shareToken=5feda18499a43666c647b35d0afca9ff

The rules on trans athletes reward cheats and punish the innocent
Letting men compete as women simply if they change their name and take hormones is unfair — no matter how those athletes may throw their weight around

Shortly before Christmas I inadvertently stumbled into the mother and father of a spat about gender and fair play in sport. It began with an instinctive reaction and a tweet that I wrote on a serious forum dealing with the subject. “You can’t just proclaim yourself a female and be able to compete against women,” I tweeted. “There must be some standards, and having a penis and competing as a woman would not fit that standard.”

Perhaps I could have phrased it more delicately and less dogmatically, but I was not prepared for the onslaught that followed, chiefly from a Canadian academic and transgender cyclist named Rachel McKinnon.

McKinnon won the Masters Track cycling world championship in Los Angeles last October in the 35-44 age category. It was a victory that gave rise to controversy — not least because the woman who came third, Jennifer Wagner-Assali, said it was “not fair”.

McKinnon has vigorously defended her right to compete, pointing out that, when tested, her levels of testosterone, the male hormone, were well within the limits set by world cycling’s governing body. Nevertheless, at 6ft tall and weighing more than 14 stone, she appeared to have a substantial advantage in muscle mass over her rivals.

My tweet brought an angry response from McKinnon, whom I had not named (I had no idea who she was at the time). She accused me of being “transphobic” and demanded I delete my tweet and apologise. Since I have spent much of my life fighting injustice, on my own behalf and for others, I was pretty put out, especially when the bullying tweets from McKinnon continued, like incoming fire.

Ever the peacemaker, I promised to keep quiet on the subject until I had properly researched it.
Well, I’ve now done that and, if anything, my views have strengthened. To put the argument at its most basic: a man can decide to be female, take hormones if required by whatever sporting organisation is concerned, win everything in sight and perhaps earn a small fortune, and then reverse his decision and go back to making babies if he so desires. It’s insane and it’s cheating. I am happy to address a transgender woman in whatever form she prefers, but I would not be happy to compete against her. It would not be fair.

Simply reducing hormone levels — the prescription most sports have adopted — does not solve the problem. A man builds up muscle and bone density, as well as a greater number of oxygen-carrying red blood cells, from childhood. Training increases the discrepancy. Indeed, if a male were to change gender in such a way as to eliminate any accumulated advantage, he would have to begin hormone treatment before puberty. For me, that is unthinkable.

Hundreds of athletes who have changed gender by declaration and limited hormone treatment have already achieved honours as women that were beyond their capabilities as men, especially in sports in which power rather than skill is paramount. McKinnon is just one example. That may uphold the International Olympic Committee’s charter, which holds that “the practice of sport is a human right”, but it is surely unfair on women who have to compete against people who, biologically, are still men.

I know the argument is made that sport is always unfair and that the notion of a level playing field is a myth. Someone who is 5ft tall has next to no chance on a basketball court. But I still believe that fairness should always be valued and strived for, and that unfairness introduced through human action and chemical means should be condemned and outlawed.

Let me make a critical distinction between transgender and transsexual athletes. Transsexuals have decided to change their gender and have had the deed done, surgically. They have made the full commitment. They are few in number and rarely enjoy a competitive advantage.

Back in the 1970s, when I was competing, Renée Richards appeared on the women’s tour. Originally a man named Richard Raskind — a strong but not outstanding player who competed at the US Open — Raskind changed his sex through surgery, changed his name (Renée means “reborn” in French) and began to compete as a woman.

I had no objection (she later became my coach and a friend), but some players refused to compete against her and the United States Tennis Association prevented her from competing at the US Open. She took the organisation to court for discrimination and won. She competed once more at the US Open, with very similar results to those she achieved two decades earlier as a man.

Judgments are difficult and dilemmas abound (Richards, now an ophthalmologist, these days has misgivings about her actions herself), but the ruling principle most be fairness.

That brings me to the most controversial current case, involving Caster Semenya, the Olympic 800m champion. She was designated female at birth and has been raised as female throughout her life. Suspicions were aroused because she was such a dominant runner and her body shape looked male.

It turned out that Semenya has a condition called hyperandrogenism, which produces naturally occurring, but elevated, levels of testosterone. She has never taken medication or sought an advantage. She has just trained and run.

Unfortunately, the International Association of Athletics Federations decided to bring in a rule requiring female athletes with naturally high testosterone levels to take hormone therapy for six months and then to maintain lower testosterone levels.

The new rule, which was due to come into force last November until it was legally challenged by Semenya and Athletics South Africa, was to apply to track events from 400m to a mile. Leaving out sprints and longer distances seems to me to be a clear case of discrimination by targeting Semenya. And can it be right to order athletes to take medication? What if the long-term effects proved harmful?

Semenya’s case will come up tomorrow at the Court of Arbitration for Sport. It is expected to last a week and the outcome is expected on March 29. I hope she wins.

Semenya, Richards and many others have been subject to vilification, ostracism and the awful human inclination to identify anyone who is different and start a witch hunt. I had problems of that kind myself when I came out as gay in 1981, and it hurt, terribly.

McKinnon, who says she received more than 100,000 hate messages on Twitter after winning the world championship, has presented herself and other transgender athletes as victims of prejudice. Certainly, there can be no excuse for such ignorance and nastiness.

But I also deplore what seems to be a growing tendency among transgender activists to denounce anyone who argues against them and to label them all as “transphobes”. That’s just another form of tyranny. I’m relatively tough and was able to stand up for myself in my Twitter exchange with McKinnon, but I worry that others may be cowed into silence or submission.

Here’s how I concluded my Twitter spat: “Rachel, you may be an expert on all things trans, but you are one nasty human being. Attack, attack, attack. I will not take it from you. You did not engage; you bullied. Not blocking you [though I later did, because who wants all that negativity], but enough already. All I want is fairness.”