Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Prepare for civil war then. Some people will get fed up with this nonsense to the point where they'll rise up.

There won't be a civil war. People are just going to stop listening to social media "town square" claims of victimhood (already happening), and eventually that will be so ubiquitous that companies will follow suit. At least the ones the rest of us haven't punished by going elsewhere for services.
 
There won't be a civil war. People are just going to stop listening to social media "town square" claims of victimhood (already happening), and eventually that will be so ubiquitous that companies will follow suit. At least the ones the rest of us haven't punished by going elsewhere for services.
I’m stockpiling anyway. Best case scenario my kids can use the ammo to hunt soup cans in the better tomorrow we all hope for. Worst case I’ll need it. I’m not looking forward to any armed conflict but that is just how it be on this bitch of an earth sometimes.
 
Wait, twenty one thousand? Seriously? 21,000 hate crimes in the U.S.?

Bullshit. I bet he's including, 'Didn't give me the toy with my Happy Meal' or something.

The really sad part is, I don't. This is slowly becoming our reality. People's reputation falling apart, losing their jobs, or worse, all because of petty or even baseless accusations that have to believed no matter what as the victim is not just a victim of "being kissed on the cheek without consent", but because they're also a victim of this "toxic society built by toxic people". This a fresh new kind of Hell and quite frankly, I'm not looking forward to where things are going if this shit continues to go unchecked. This new age mentality, call it SJW culture, rad-feminism, liberalism, neo-liberalism, censorship, cultural marxism, whatever; it goes by many names, but the real issue is that it's basically become the moral high-ground. The substitute for laws and holy creeds. Which is why so many among the masses do not object to it or even happily embrace it, because whether they agree with it or not, they have been led into believing that this is the height of morality and justice, and they wouldn't dare object to it.

On a side note, what I do find funny is how they enforce that "victims should be believed no matter what" yet the guy who claimed to be a victim of George Takei was demonized from day 1 and Takei remains the only celebrity at the time who suffered no repercussions and even demanded his accuser apologize.
If you want to see how things can go spectacularly sideways, look at Che Guevara's views on trials and evidence. Due process? Nah, revolutionary justice demands we skip to the punishment!

Again, this goes back to the left's desire to build alternate power frameworks that bypass existing structures and eliminate pesky issues like basic rights in favor of 'social justice'.
 
Wait, twenty one thousand? Seriously? 21,000 hate crimes in the U.S.?

Bullshit. I bet he's including, 'Didn't give me the toy with my Happy Meal' or something.


If you want to see how things can go spectacularly sideways, look at Che Guevara's views on trials and evidence. Due process? Nah, revolutionary justice demands we skip to the punishment!

Again, this goes back to the left's desire to build alternate power frameworks that bypass existing structures and eliminate pesky issues like basic rights in favor of 'social justice'.
Parallel moral-idealistic structures must be constructed because the revolution runs on urgency and criminal courts and pesky questions of provable guilt slow down the sacrifices needed to keep the propaganda engine running. It’s why all roads lead to accelerationism. Once you lose your mandate of urgency, people start asking uncomfortable questions about what comes next.
 
6e374f7171c104bb3b7b6d5d7399faa3.png

You know things are getting brutal when even the 9th Circuit is ruling in favour of Trump's administration.
I read that three times and I still can't figure out why the 9th Circuit didn't play activist.
 
I read that three times and I still can't figure out why the 9th Circuit didn't play activist.

tl;dr The 9th court isn't all pants-shitting libtards, and this was a 3-judge decision, not the full panel, and Trump caught two of the less shitty judges.

Not to mention that our district courts are by and large still very good at what they do. Even the ninth, which has a reversal rate of 79% from the SCotUS, only has 1/650 of their cases pulled. You shouldn't view it as "The ninth is involved, a shit decision is about to happen", but rather "a shit decision happened, this almost certainly came from the ninth".

It's sort of like the statement "most rapists aren't male feminists, but most male feminists are rapists"
 
Jeffrey Wright is a stupid fuck? Who would have thought.

Reading the oddly vapid interviews he gave during the last season of Westworld I had already came to that conclusion. The season was utter shite yet he talked it up like it was some crowning achievement. His performance was particularly bad, though that may have been more the fault of the garbage writing and poor direction. Seeing him suffering from TDS is no shocker.
 
:story: http://archive.fo/dV26n
Dz9Ux9CX4AUn9v6.jpg
On 29 January, Empire actor Jussie Smollett captured the world's attention. Smollett alleged that around 2am in Chicago, he was called racial and homophobic slurs and beaten by Trump supporters who yelled “This is MAGA country." What made the attack appear even more gruesome was the allegation that he was covered in bleach and a rope was tied around his neck. The details were horrific, sparking national outrage days before the start of Black History Month.

But, as the details began to unfold, it became clear that Smollett may have faked the attack. News and police reports since have suggested that he hired two Nigerian actors to stage it. Smollett has since been arrested and charged with felony disorderly conduct for filing a false police report to the Chicago Police Department. It’s been suggested that he could have staged the attack because he was dissatisfied with this salary on Empire.

Superintendent of the CPD Eddie Johnson expressed his dismay over the alleged false police report, not only as a law enforcement officer but as a black man in America, at a press conference this morning. Given their history, and more recently how Laquan McDonald’s case was handled, it’s understandable why some folks are slow to take the CPD at their word — but the evidence appears to be overwhelming. Smollett's lawyers have said that they will launch an "aggressive" defence. <- Nice typo

If Smollett is convicted and he did indeed stage this attack, it does a disservice to the decades of work done by civil rights and LGBTQ advocates to allow Jussie Smollett his current position of opportunity. He will have also done a disservice to all of those who are real victims of hate crimes. Smollett will have taken advantage of the sympathy and belief of victims that exists among liberals for his attempted personal gain, and for that, he is a disgrace.
Does this diminish the stories of real victims? No. Does this somehow void the culture of hatred and racial violence President Trump has cultivated in America since he launched his campaign with a promise to build a wall to keep out Mexican "rapists" and ban Muslims? No. Nevertheless, the right persists in doing what they do best: taking one event and generalizing.

After the evidence mounted against Smollett's claim, conservatives, including Donald Trump Jr., began to rejoice. They mocked Democrats and members of the media for believing the false allegation in the first place. Some tried to paint the entire charade as a coordinated liberal hoax.
There's an easy explanation for why so many people believed Smollett. Not because it was a liberal hoax. It was so widely accepted at face value because, in the hateful environment President Trump has cultivated, it was entirely believable.

Last year, the FBI announced that hate crimes rose 17 per cent in 2017 — the third consecutive year hate crimes have risen. Just yesterday, The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) published their "Year In Hate" analysis tracking hate groups around the US. They found hate groups surged by 30 per cent over the last four years. That makes 2018 the fourth consecutive year of hate group growth.

According to the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism, only 0.2 per cent of the 21,000 hate crimes they tracked between 2016 and 2018 were fake reports. The data proves Jussie Smollett's claim does little to detract from the very real threat bigotry poses in America. If one needs further proof, look no further than yesterday's headlines.

While the news of Smollett's charges spread on Twitter, a stunning development occurred that should have refocused the national discourse. In a court filing, prosecutors alleged that US Coast Guard Lt. Christopher Paul Hasson was arrested Friday for stockpiling weapons and plotting an attack on Democrats and prominent journalists. Hasson was accused of having ties to white supremacists and espousing neo-Nazi views. The court filing labeled him as a domestic terrorist and the opening line began to detail the startling plot: "The defendant intends to murder innocent civilians on a scale rarely seen in this country."

We heard no mention of this on President Trump's Twitter feed, but this morning, we did get this statement: ".@JussieSmollett - what about MAGA and the tens of millions of people you insulted with your racist and dangerous comments!? #MAGA”.

To that I say: why is the president of the United States tweeting about one potential fake report of a hate crime before tweeting about the fact a domestic neo-Nazi terrorist plot was averted?

To that I say: what about the millions of people in marginalized communities he has insulted with his own racist and dangerous fear-mongering?
To that I say: what about President Trump's dangerous attacks on the media even after one of his supporters mailed pipe bombs to CNN, and prominent Democrats,another one of his supporters assaulted a BBC cameraman at a Trump rally, and after he's defended Saudi Arabia for their murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi?

As a black man and journalist, I can tell you, I am far more concerned about thesurges in radical right-wing terrorism under a president who continues to use radicalizing rhetoric even after his critics are targeted again and again. Until people on the right stop advocating policies that perpetuate systemic racism, increase anti-LGBTQ discrimination, and widen wealth inequality, the president should spare us of calls to sympathize with the "MAGA" people who felt insulted by Jussie Smollett's alleged hoax.

Ahmed Baba is the co-founder and editor-in-chief of Rantt Media
 
Holy fucking shit, Adam Schiff just channeled his inner manchild and sperged the fuck out hard in the Washington Post.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...411414-3605-11e9-af5b-b51b7ff322e9_story.html

Fucking cuck said:
This is a moment of great peril for our democracy. Our country is deeply divided. Our national discourse has become coarse, indeed, poisonous. Disunity and dysfunction have paralyzed Congress.

And while our attention is focused inward, the world spins on, new authoritarian regimes are born, old rivals spread their pernicious ideologies, and the space for freedom-loving peoples begins to contract violently. At last week’s Munich Security Conference, the prevailing sentiment among our closest allies is that the United States can no longer be counted on to champion liberal democracy or defend the world order we built.

For the past two years, we have examined Russia’s interference in the 2016 election and its attempts to influence the 2018 midterms. Moscow’s effort to undermine our democracy was spectacularly successful in inflaming racial, ethnic and other divides in our society and turning American against American.

But the attack on our democracy had its limits. Russian President Vladimir Putin could not lead us to distrust our own intelligence agencies or the FBI. He could not cause us to view our own free press as an enemy of the people. He could not undermine the independence of the Justice Department or denigrate judges. Only we could do that to ourselves. Although many forces have contributed to the decline in public confidence in our institutions, one force stands out as an accelerant, like gas on a fire. And try as some of us might to avoid invoking the arsonist’s name, we must say it.

I speak, of course, of our president, Donald Trump.

The president has just declared a national emergency to subvert the will of Congress and appropriate billions of dollars for a border wall that Congress has explicitly refused to fund. Whether you support the border wall or oppose it, you should be deeply troubled by the president’s intent to obtain it through a plainly unconstitutional abuse of power.

To my Republican colleagues: When the president attacked the independence of the Justice Department by intervening in a case in which he is implicated, you did not speak out. When he attacked the press as the enemy of the people, you again were silent. When he targeted the judiciary, labeling judges and decisions he didn’t like as illegitimate, we heard not a word. And now he comes for Congress, the first branch of government, seeking to strip it of its greatest power, that of the purse.

Many of you have acknowledged your deep misgivings about the president in quiet conversations over the past two years. You have bemoaned his lack of decency, character and integrity. You have deplored his fundamental inability to tell the truth. But for reasons that are all too easy to comprehend, you have chosen to keep your misgivings and your rising alarm private.

That must end. The time for silent disagreement is over. You must speak out.

This will require courage. The president is popular among your base, which revels in his vindictive and personal attacks on members of his own party, even giants such as the late senator John McCain. Speaking up risks a primary challenge or accusations of disloyalty. But such acts of independence are the most profound demonstrations of loyalty to country.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III may soon conclude his investigation and report. Depending on what is in that report and what we find in our own investigations, our nation may face an even greater challenge. While I am alarmed at what we have already seen and found of the president’s conduct and that of his campaign, I continue to reserve judgment about what consequences should flow from our eventual findings. I ask you to do the same.

If we cannot rise to the defense of our democracy now, in the face of a plainly unconstitutional aggrandizement of presidential power, what hope can we have that we will do so with the far greater decisions that could be yet to come?

Although these times pose unprecedented challenges, we have been through worse. The divisions during the Vietnam War and the civil rights movement were just as grave and far more deadly. The Depression and World War II were far more consequential. And nothing can compare to the searing experience of the Civil War.

If Abraham Lincoln, the father of the Republican Party, could be hopeful that our bonds of affection would be strained but not broken by a war that pitted brother against brother, surely America can come together once more. But as long as we must endure the present trial, history compels us to speak, and act, our conscience, Republicans and Democrats alike.
 
Holy fucking shit, Adam Schiff just channeled his inner manchild and sperged the fuck out hard in the Washington Post.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...411414-3605-11e9-af5b-b51b7ff322e9_story.html

This is of course completely 100% different than Obama using executive privilege to shield his AG from being outted as either incompetent or corrupt, or burying reports that the State Department did jack shit to shelter our Libyan embassy, as those were completely justified.
 
There won't be a civil war. People are just going to stop listening to social media "town square" claims of victimhood (already happening), and eventually that will be so ubiquitous that companies will follow suit. At least the ones the rest of us haven't punished by going elsewhere for services.

The "civil war" has been on since 2016, the Left is losing it badly, while they argue like Generals in the Fuhrebunker about which phantom army on the map will come to save them. All you have to do is look the IDpol/SJWs in the face and say a firm "NO" and they lose. They have no ability to really enforce their will.

-The laws they pass to enforce newthink and punish wrongthink are struck down
-The media outlets and hobby communities they overrun to inject with their newthink die off from disinterest (Comics, Vidya, Hollywoke movies)
-Their censorship-happy newspapers and social media outlets are not loved by the public, but rather deferred to with held noses and clenched teeth until something better comes along.
-They don't have any guns, having long since declared only losers stock and train with arms.
-They don't have charismatic leadership, every head of every troonshirt militia is a screeching dangerhair or soyboy who don't speak to the "common man" (Yes, I said "MAN" want me to change that to "common person"? NO! And you cannot compel me) The reason the Nazis were able to get away with street-level beatings is becasue the public fundamentally agreed that Communists and Jews deserved it and looked the other way. The public today does not, fundamentally, believe you deserve a bike lock to the head for thinking there are only two genders or that a rape claim doesn't need evidence if the accused is a male and white. The likes of ANTIFA thinks they have our support, but that's because they stew in online echo chambers all day where anyone who doesn't' tell them they're right is cast out.

Their power is that of the Victorians, self-enforced through coordinated social shaming, and when the masses finally got sick of flagellating themselves for their social "Crimes" , they rejected it and no amount of "cease your immorality AT ONCE!" from the elite could put it back together again, because the response was "make us". They couldn't.

The 2016 election was proof the left's darling philosophy of progressive globalism has been rejected and the insanity we've seen since is that side melting down, a glorious peacefully defiant rejection of Neo-Victorianism that they cannot stop any way short of coordinated political violence that they haven't the means or material to commit.

When stealing MAGA hats, phoning in fake hate crimes, and beating defenseless old men is the best they can do, (and get sent to court for it) I fear them not.
 
Last edited:
Back