🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Marco Fucko said:
G'DAY MATE DIDJA KNOW WE GOTTA GAS THE JEWS TA PROTECT A FUTURE FOR OUR WHITE CHILDREN?
Click to expand...
The more they rely on news, the more they'll have to cater to this part of their audience. Notice how many Jew stories they've covered tonight? The problem with that is that TRS does the same thing but with years of experience behind them. And they don't dog-whistle and then go on and say "We're not actually antisemitic".

It would've been one thing if they were still on YouTube doing that where they'll have the excuse of not going "full redpill", but if that's going to be the bulk of their content, what's the point of going to a shitty streaming site to hear watered-down Mike Enoch takes?

They can't go full autistic on the JQ like TRS, as easy as that might seem, and they can't do in-depth analyses of the history of Zionism, Israel and AIPAC like Ryan Dawson (reading "The Israel Lobby" isn't enough, Ralph).

I know you're reading this Ethan, just do drama.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Spooky, Army Burger and Marco Fucko
Smarty Pants said:
@DispatchCommit didn't choose the autism, the autism chose him. It wasn't worth doxing two paypigs that nobody even gives a shit about anymore. Going after Ralph's income is extremely gay. Does Dispatch want to run Ralph off the internet? To me this doesn't seem like he's in it for the laughs, it seems like he actually hates Ralph and wants to ruin his life.

It's funny when Ralph loses money organically due to sperging out and associating with Andy and Zoom, but going out of your way to make sure Ralph's cut off is what makes him an A-log.
Click to expand...
Him sperging bout the gunt stuff was pretty gay, yeah. I'd just press on that. I'm gonna guess he lost some subscribers due to that "it's possible to get emails off stream.me" which I still don't see how it is. That would have been a massive security oversight.


Dispatch was comfortably in what, #2 or #3? He was already on the shit list for causing a panic about IP scraping and yes, people closed their accounts because they are that exceptional. He then unfortunately developed the /cow/ version of redpill tourettes and bought ethanralph.com and gave me permission to write the content. The site only contained 2 actual doxes: some fat bitch and an adopted beaner (and his family, sans younger step-brother). I didn't even bother to verify them, they're literally just whitepages.com screencaps which is often out of date/wrong. I scraped the facebooks from the valor fighting post and posted it on /cow/ when I did it but no one cared. Sat on it until it became useful and posted it on the website. They're ironically probably the most accurate doxes since people add their every life detail on social media. The other "doxes" i.e the Guntguards were just some mongs that came into whatever stream I was watching and raged. They're called paypiggies because everyone who goes out of their way to defend their e-celeb is probably a paypiggy.
Click to expand...
Right. Doxxxed them to just fuck with them or what? I guess curing faggotry with faggotry works... no it really doesn't. Everyone has spergy paypiggies and they deserve to be ovened, not given even more attention.


Everyone knew it was me doing the content and I even woke up at 3am on a fucking Saturday to stream with Dispatch and explained everything. Ethan still blamed him because he "hosted" it, or as sonic nigger said "commissioned" it (still waiting on my cheque). I'll give it a few years until Ethan realizes that that argument means he's also responsible for all of his guests actions on stream and the streams that he appears on.
Click to expand...
This line of defence would only work if his "guests" have the same overreach as Gator and Zidan. They don't. The callers also don't. (This is called a false equivalence) Ralph is responsible for what Gator and Zidan says by associating with them and giving them the privileges of being the co-host. If either Gator or Zidan says "I'll go bomb a _____" and shows the intention to do so, and if Ralph doesn't report it, then he's responsible, less guilty but still guilty nonetheless. How about this? Zidan and Gator are gathering the doxxes of say CRP and JF viewers, they host is on the Killstream. Ralph cosigns their actions by being oblivious to it. Do you honestly think Ralph won't be blamed for such faggotry?

It's still a guilt by association, but the real world isn't a book of informal fallacies. If an anchor on CNN says he wants to shoot up a Trump rally, he's not fired, and he goes and shoots up this said rally, do you thin CNN as a company will go dust free? Higher ups won't get charged with anything, probably, since they have good lawyers. In your case, that whatever SEAgook nigger who was working with you had the same overreach, so obviously people are going to blame you for what he does. You knew what was going on, you didn't care. Yes it's a gay guilt by association no matter how one puts it, you didn't do the dirty work, but that's how the real world works. Also double standards is pretty much how humans emotionally operate. Some nigger in Africa dies of starvation or dehydration every minute, do we care? Now if a relative got involved in some car crash, I'm sure most people would care. This is why the "objectivism" approach is gay.

In addition to all this, buying the domain under Godspeed/Zoom's name is just you asking for shit. That was an extremely gay move. It's like doxxxxing yourself. No idea what made you do that, let's just hope the dox he found is fake and you're really undoxxxable. If it wasn't you who bought it but rather someone else, Zoom is gonna be digging up you and your associate's shit regardless.

Now that things are clear, I won't bring up the stupid doxxxxing anymore since you didn't do it, you merely cosigned it. I can care less regardless. I found your stats to be interesting, let's see what comes up next.
 
  • Informative
  • Autistic
  • Agree
Reactions: debatelimination, Spooky and zyclonPD
heathercho said:
Real question : Why are people legitimately happy/excited to see alternative platforms go under? I mean, all these gay ops have one end game and that's to deplatform each other and to kill the platform itself. Sort of makes no sense.
Click to expand...
Same reason why people that care about politics want to deplatform each other - nobody really gives a shit about any principles, they just want to own their opponents. Stream.me is a microcosm of that phenomena. Even though pretty much everyone involved in this shitshow agrees with free speech and making edgy jokes on the internet, they use the political environment to fuck with the people they don't like. It's gay but that's the world we live in.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: White Devil's Advocate, The_MmmBop_Gang, zyclonPD and 4 others
Ol' Slag said:
Ralph really needs to lay off the booze.

Ralph is the kind of drunk that is on a first name basis with the guy behind the counter of the local liquor store.
Click to expand...
Agreed. His drinking and diet is awful since Nora is in the UK and Ralph is left to his own devices, which is a fat, lazy, alcoholic.
 
23ae5c870c9d840684df856ef5511ce6643700a5.jpg
 
  • Winner
  • Islamic Content
  • Horrifying
Reactions: AltisticRight, snackbar hero, White Devil's Advocate and 25 others
Degenerated said:
View attachment 673228
Click to expand...

There we go, finally something not that low effort. Ralph should have embraced this shit and had fun with it. Engage with community and even the trolls. Do something like the art competitions Jim has done, tell the trolls to take their best shot and he'll post the 5 best gunt images.

Ralph must be really thin skinned. Well, except for the obvious area.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: IamnottheNSA, not william stenchever, Pixis and 4 others
TRR Viewer Analytics
The show has come to a close, here's a look back on the viewer analytics! Nothing special happened or occurred tonight so nothing exceptionally noteworthy.

TL;DR I'm not autistic: Missed the beginning ramp up, so we start ~15 minutes into the show just before peak viewership is hit. After peak viewership, there is a steady decline til the end of the show. We see a similar drop off to last night at the end of the show. Small channels again do not appear to be able to pick up any substantial amount of users leaving (by design? to prevent drama?).

START
I missed it due to an issue with with my chosen API endpoint not updating as often as I wanted.

PEAK VIEWS
Just after 7:30pm we reach peak viewership at just over 1.7K viewers. After this early peak, we see a slow trickle of users leaving.

upload_2019-2-21_23-22-27.png


OVERVIEW
There appears to be a steady loss of users til around 9:30pm where we hold steady around 1.2k until the end of the show. There are no upswings, I don't notice any noteworthy moments such as a sudden drop in users.

My take: Some viewers were uninterested in the heavier news coverage. TBH, I don't recall anything sticking out as noteworthy during the show (just passively listening).
iiGsfOvZxSAPkBatpDyWkXzo


EXITING USERS
upload_2019-2-21_23-33-24.png


1 hour after the show TRR's viewers appears to stabilize.
1.5 hours after and the next most popular channel is only able to scrape a total of 60 viewers from the fleeting audience. Again I believe that by making streams more difficult to discover we see very few even attempting to check out other channels.
upload_2019-2-21_23-40-47.png


Despite the rapid drop in users on Ralph's channel, we only see small increases on other channels towards the ends, where Ralph's AFK usercount holds steady.

For reference - Here is Zoom's channel (orange) going live after Metokur this morning. We see a sudden, then steady gain in viewers. A few lulls here and there, but ultimately "peaking up" multiple times throughout the main show as Zoom switches topics, before a sharp drop-off leading into the second half of the show, before finally coming to a close. Further enforcing the theory that if you don't bring your own audience, you don't have much room to grow organically on this site.

unknown.png


What do you think? Is it better to hit a peak and slowly bleed viewers, or a fluctuating wave of content quality that pushes and pull the viewers?

To me, I think this shows that Zoom's shows can be seen as more 'exciting' or 'interesting' since things will go form losing views, to gaining more than they dropped by. Thus it appears to me as though it's retaining or even growing the audience rather than slowly losing it.

Also let me know if there's any changes / modification / features you'd like to see in these graphs.

(for those who care - I may use these posts as an outline for a future stream)
 
  • Informative
  • Autistic
  • Winner
Reactions: AltisticRight, The Flawless Gazelles, Tookie and 10 others
I think zoom fairs better for viewer retention as he usually sticks to one big over arching topic rather than scattering a mixture of news and drama comments throughout. The drop off near the end is probably where the stupid corky stuff begins. He also regularly has events happen in his show (bad or good) that cause people to go advertise and pull views back in. Like today with the cop phone call going awol.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Spooky
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back