Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

How about we get back to observing TDS instead of slapping each other and screaming like banshees with everyone's favorite MSM, CNN with a cameo from WaPo deciding that he's worse than Nixon for scandals that have so far meant nothing and done nothing along with saying mean words.


View attachment 692106

Considering the fact that with the press it's hard to see what's even true anymore. Nice double standard there CNN. Especially since using Nixon's quote about the press, is a good way to show your true colors.
 
Can you autists stop the petty slapfighting ITT? Every post of deathangel77's generates 5-6 REEEEEEEE posts and the recent thread quality is on par with resetera.
The TDS was coming... from inside the thread! OooOOOoooo.
It's okay. Only a small part of the U.S. watches CNN anyway. No one's gonna care.
Only a small part is still too big.
 
Actually, he's just on the tail end of Texas barrier construction. He wanted to tear down what was already built and place concrete barriers that would cost about a trillion dollars over the next 10 years. He bumped up against Texas city, county, and landowners and their lawsuits.

It is what it is.

You must be the Democratic strategy planner.

"Okay we failed to stop the wall. The new plan is, the wall was almost finished, and Trump just put his name on it, Obama was the one who was doing all the real work."
 
How about we get back to observing TDS instead of slapping each other and screaming like banshees with everyone's favorite MSM, CNN with a cameo from WaPo deciding that he's worse than Nixon for scandals that have so far meant nothing and done nothing along with saying mean words.


View attachment 692106

I thought that "compensating" was about one's genitalia?
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Kinkshamer
How about we get back to observing TDS instead of slapping each other and screaming like banshees with everyone's favorite MSM, CNN with a cameo from WaPo deciding that he's worse than Nixon for scandals that have so far meant nothing and done nothing along with saying mean words.


View attachment 692106
The real question is how Max Boot has any followers or credibility.
 
Considering he just announced he's no longer a 'conservative' (which was news to people who didn't think he was anything of the sort anyways), I guess he's now evolving towards loving the D as in Democrat.

I guess he got tired of being on the "winning side" and decided that the "losing side" is a lot better. Either that or he doesnt like the big bad orange and decided that the other side looked promising.
 
Trump hijacked it and was going to use this for a "success" when Bush and Obama worked on this from California to New Mexico already.

America is experiencing serious social and economic difficulty with illegal immigrants who are flooding across our borders. We simply can’t absorb them. It is a scandal when America cannot control its own borders. A liberal policy of immigration may seem to reflect confidence and generosity. But our current laxness toward illegal immigration shows a recklessness and disregard for those who live here legally.

The majority of legal immigrants can often make significant contributions to our society because they have special skills and because they add to our nation’s cultural diversity. They come with the best of intentions. But legal immigrants do not and should not enter easily. It’s a long, costly, draining, and often frustrating experience-by design. I say to legal immigrants: Welcome and good luck.

It comes down to this: we must take care of our own people first. Our policy to people born elsewhere should be clear: Enter by the law, or leave.
- from 'The America We Deserve', Donald Trump, 2000

The 5-Point Trump Plan

Now, as for what to do about illegal immigration, we should follow the repeal of the anchor baby provisions with a five-point program to create a smart and humane plan to get illegal immigration under control. It starts with securing our borders. Look, if a nation can’t protect its own borders, it ceases to be a country. We’re not just some landmass that anyone who wants to can trample on at will. I believe America is an exceptional nation worthy of protection. That requires getting tough on border enforcement. We can and should have a robust debate over whether that means continuing to build the physical border fence or utilizing “virtual fences” that use lasers as trip wires to monitor illegal border crossings.

From the research my people have shown me, I’m not impressed with the mediocre success rates of the current crop of virtual fences that have been developed and tested. I am, however, impressed with the success of the double- and triple-layered fence in places like Yuma, Arizona. The wall there is a serious 20-foot wall. It has three walls separated by 75-yard “no man’s lands” for border agents to zoom up and down in vehicles. It also has cameras, radio systems, radar, and pole-topped lights. “This wall works,” says U.S. border patrol agent Michael Bernacke. “A lot of people have the misconception that it is a waste of time and money, but the numbers of apprehensions show that it works.” After the triple-layered fence was installed, the 120-mile stretch of the U.S.-Mexican border known as the Yuma sector experienced a 72 percent plunge in illegal immigrant apprehensions. Before the fence was installed, 800 people were apprehended attempting to enter America each day. Post-fence, that number was 50 or fewer.

Some say Yuma’s flat terrain makes it a special case and that other parts of the border aren’t conducive to that kind of fence. In that case, we just need to be ready to build other kinds of fences, too. The point is that properly built walls work. We just need the political will to finish the job. And by the way, finishing the job will employ a lot of construction workers. Moreover, I call on Congress and the president to hire another 25,000 border patrol agents and give them the aerial equipment they need, such as Predator drones, to provide real-time aerial reconnaissance information to agents guarding the border wall.

Second, we need a president who will enforce our laws. Right now, in a sneaky attempt to appease the strong and well-organized pro-amnesty lobby, the Department of Homeland Security has, on Obama’s orders, put a freeze on the deportation of 300,000 illegal immigrants. The administration says it wants to review each case individually and will only deport illegal aliens with criminal records, and that “no enforcement resources will be expended on those who do not pose a threat to public safety.”

This wholesale abdication of a president’s constitutional duties is as shocking as it is foolish. It’s political pandering of the worst kind. Worse, Obama has said these aliens who were slated for deportation can obtain work permits ! So in Obama we have a president who is not only not enforcing our laws, he is helping illegal immigrants to break them further! Obama wants to reward illegal immigrants by giving them the chance to take yet another American job. “The lesson for illegal aliens,” says James R. Edwards Jr., coauthor of The Congressional Politics of Immigration Reform, is that if they get “caught, they can escape immigration trouble, win legal status and seek a work permit.”

How can we ask our brave U.S. border agents to risk their lives when the commander in chief is just going to shrug his shoulders and let 300,000 illegals make a mockery of our laws? It’s a total disgrace. Obama should be ashamed to play politics on an issue of such national importance. But he’s not. He thinks it’s cute and makes jokes about it, and he thinks it will win him votes on the insulting assumption that Latino Americans don’t care about America’s laws. The evidence is clear that President Obama certainly doesn’t care about America’s immigration laws. After all, two of his relatives—his uncle Omar Onyango Obama (arrested for drunk driving in Massachusetts) and his aunt Zeituni Onyango—are illegal aliens who have magically avoided deportation, with his aunt having finally been awarded asylum. Republican Congressman Steve King of Iowa has called for congressional hearings into whether the White House intervened on behalf of President Obama’s relatives. But of course the bigger scandal is that it is Obama administration policy to give special treatment to all illegal aliens—to treat them as if they are legal.

You just can’t make this stuff up. Can you imagine the national firestorm the liberal media would have stoked had President George W. Bush had not one but two illegal immigrant family members who had received special treatment and been permitted to stay in America? Or what if President Bush had failed to enforce environmental laws and gave orders to federal agencies to help businesses break such laws? Democrats would have called for Bush’s impeachment. But not this president. The liberal media protect Obama every way they can.

The third thing we need to do is overturn Obama’s insane new ICE recommendations for illegal immigrant detention facilities. In an effort to coddle illegal aliens, officials at nine detention facilities have now been instructed to make the following changes:

• Soften the look for the facility with hanging plants, flower baskets, new paint colors . . . wall graphics and framed pictures on the walls, and enhance the aesthetics of the living areas....
• Expand programming for detainees to include movie nights, bingo, arts and crafts, dance, walk and exercise classes, health and welfare classes, basic cooking classes, tutoring and self-paced computer training on portable computer stations....
• Provide celebrations of special occasions and [allow] a detainee to receive outside, packaged food for celebrations....
• Provide fresh carrot sticks and celery or other vegetables in a bar format....
• Provide self-serve beverage bars....
• Offer water and tea in the housing area at all times.
• Provide a unit manager so detainees have someone available to talk to and to solve problems in the facility other than the immediate guard....
• Survey community-based immigration advocacy groups and immigration attorneys for suggestions that may improve communication and ease of access....
• Increase availability of legal supplies and postage ... for legal correspondence.
• Add research resources at the law libraries....
• [Provide] non-penal clothing for detainees to wear.
• Eliminate lock downs and lights out....
• Reduce the frequency of and . . . wholly eliminate pat down searches....
• Provide four hours or more hours of recreation in a natural setting. . . .
• Provide internet-based free phone service.
• Provide email access for detainees....

That’s right, your government now requires resort-like accommodations—paid for by you, the American taxpayer—to reward the flood of people entering our country illegally. Obama has turned America into a laughingstock. Our next president must stop this insanity.
The next part of my plan involves opposing the so-called DREAM Act, which grants in-state tuition benefits at public colleges and universities to illegal immigrant college students. The Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) proposal is yet another attempt by Obama and his pro-amnesty pals to create new anchors and rewards for those who defy our laws.

So get this: under the DREAM Act, if you’re not a citizen but a child of illegal immigrants, then you get in-state tuition benefits, but if you’re a legal citizen living out of state, you have to pay higher tuition. So an American student in Texas who wants to go to college in Arizona will have to pay more in tuition than a non-citizen student living illegally in Arizona. How fair is that? The fact that legislation like the DREAM Act has even seen the light of day shows you just how upside down our immigration policies have become—and just how far politicians are willing to pander to what they see as a Latino voting bloc. Sacrificing American laws on the altar of political expediency is immoral. If Congress is ever foolish enough to pass legislation that grants tuition breaks for illegal aliens, America’s next president must have the political courage and constitutional conviction to veto it.
- from 'Time to Get Tough, Donald Trump, 2011

IMMIGRATION: GOOD WALLS MAKE GOOD NEIGHBORS

WHEN I ANNOUNCED MY candidacy I spoke for almost an hour, covering just about every challenge that we’re facing. But the subject that got the most attention was my focus on our immigration policy. Or, in fact, our lack of any coherent immigration policy. I was pretty tough on illegal immigrants, and a lot of people didn’t like that. I said that many countries are dumping their worst people on our border and that it has to stop. A country that doesn’t control its borders can’t survive—especially with what’s going on right now.

What I said only makes common sense. I speak to border patrol guards, and they tell us who we’re letting across our border. The countries south of us are not sending us their best people. The bad people are coming from places other than just Mexico. They’re coming from all over Central and South America, and they’re coming probably—probably—from the Middle East. Let me add now: Allowing tens of thousands of Syrian refugees in the door will certainly bring a lot of problems. But we won’t know how bad, because we have no protection and we have no competence. We don’t know what’s happening. It’s got to stop, and it’s got to stop quickly.

Later in my announcement I added, “I would build a great wall, and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me, and I’ll build it very inexpensively. I will build a great wall on our southern border. And I will have Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words.” I spoke for quite a while that day. I covered just about all the problems our country is facing. But what did the media report about that speech? “Trump is anti-immigration.” “Trump calls immigrants rapists.” “Trump is starting a war with Mexico.” You want to know why we aren’t solving our problems? Why nothing changes? It’s because we’re not facing the problems and taking action.

The flow of illegal immigrants into this country is one of the most serious problems we face. It’s killing us. But until I made that point during my speech, nobody was talking about it honestly. And instead of saying, “Trump’s right and we’d better do something to stop illegal immigration right now or we’re going to lose our country,” they said, “Oh, what a terrible thing Trump said about the nice people who live south of our borders. I hope they don’t get upset at us because of that. Maybe he’ll apologize.” I understand why that happened. It’s a lot easier to criticize me for being blunt than it is to actually admit this immigration situation is a dangerous problem and then to find a way to deal with it.

Let me state this clearly: I am not against immigration.

My mother emigrated to this country from Scotland in 1918 and married my father, whose parents had come here from Germany in 1885. My parents were two of the best people who ever lived, and it was millions of people like them who made this country so wonderful and so successful.

I love immigration.

Immigrants come to this country, they want to work hard, be successful, raise their kids, and share in the American dream. It’s a beautiful story. I can close my eyes and just imagine what my relatives must have been thinking when they sailed past the Statue of Liberty into New York and their new lives. And if they could only see the results of their risk and sacrifice! How can anyone not appreciate the courage it took for these people to leave their families and come here?

What I don’t love is the concept of illegal immigration.
- from 'Crippled America', Donald Trump, 2015


He has been arguing for increased border security for at least 20 years.He has been fairly consistent on his positions over the past several decades, actually. The same cannot be said for the whither-blows-the-wind DNC that he stomped in 2016.

Just because a solution doesn’t solve 100% of a problem doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be used if it actively makes the problem smaller.

Walls regularly prevent people from entering my home. Sure, some could still break into with force and weapons, but the walls themselves prevent any random yokel from just walking onto my property and taking whatever they want. Without walls I'd have to sit upon my property like a mother hen 24/7, armed to the cloaca, just to keep people from raiding my fridge and stealing my beanie babies.

Anyone who claims that walls don't work or aren't an absolute security necessity is supremely dumb and brainwashed, or interested in profiting off the 10s of millions of slave laborers, the 100s of billions in profit from drug trafficking and sex trafficking, and the rampant election fraud that illegal immigration has generated.


The wall only stops people "walking" or driving across the southern border. I do need to remind people that the American border does run through impassable terrain and a desert.

There are organizations dedicated to providing transportation, food, water, and general assistance to illegal immigrants to make sure there are no impassable sections of the border. See Border Angels and Pueblos Sin Fronteras.

visiting Asian massage parlors.

You do know that you're the very image of an NPC, right? You have no thoughts, are not able to argue or even converse, you only recite prefabbed talking points.
 
Last edited:
From WaPo: "w-well we didn't want to impeach trump anyway! it's not that we failed, it's that he's not worth the effort!"
View attachment 692203

I think what's happening here is that they're not getting the results they desired, and they have to switch it up or perish. Fatigue is setting in and being replaced with indifference, because nobody can maintain the level of emotional uproar their propaganda pushes 24/7. People are starting to miss the families they've disowned over this stuff. And the opposition hasn't dropped their drawers for the usual "compromise" that comes after the Dems throw extended shame-and-blame tantrums.

Narcissists do learn, and they do switch up their tactics when their targets no longer provide the needed obedience and narcissistic supply. This isn't an epiphany leading to positive change; this is just a search for methods that will work. Expect a flurry of different attempts over the next several months before they settle in--including hoovering, gaslighting, and memory-holing.
 
I think what's happening here is that they're not getting the results they desired, and they have to switch it up or perish. Fatigue is setting in and being replaced with indifference, because nobody can maintain the level of emotional uproar their propaganda pushes 24/7. People are starting to miss the families they've disowned over this stuff. And the opposition hasn't dropped their drawers for the usual "compromise" that comes after the Dems throw extended shame-and-blame tantrums.

Narcissists do learn, and they do switch up their tactics when their targets no longer provide the needed obedience and narcissistic supply. This isn't an epiphany leading to positive change; this is just a search for methods that will work. Expect a flurry of different attempts over the next several months before they settle in--including hoovering, gaslighting, and memory-holing.
And then the presidential election happens, and no matter who wins there will only be milk
 
I guess he got tired of being on the "winning side" and decided that the "losing side" is a lot better. Either that or he doesnt like the big bad orange and decided that the other side looked promising.
It's because people like Max Boot, Bill Kristol, Anne Coulter, etc. were never genuinely conservative in the first place. They put the mask on because election after election they were able to beat their hands on the table and demand a Conservative President who will, "Finally do X, just like we need!" and then when a Republican actually makes it into office they'll do nothing but scream about how much they hate them, and if a Democrat gets into office they'll do nothing but make excuses for them to try and find a "middle ground."

They're boot-licking snake oil salesmen who are furious because Trump tied the hose to the gravy fountain. If all of these problems they've been harping on about for more than a decade actually get fixed, then they're out of a job. They can't rile up a crowd about immigration or opiates or prison reform if the guy at the helm solves all the problems, and that's why they hate him. They were never here to fix any of these problems to begin with, they just wanted your money.

Those spineless pricks formed the foundation for "Principled Conservatism", which basically translates to, "Loser who bends over at the first sign of opposition, but he'll get a nice CNN fluff piece for conceding." America's political class--even all the way down to commentators like these idiots--came much, much closer to being a genuine "Uniparty" system than most people really understand. Hence, once someone stepped in who was completely disinterested in that, they all flew off the handle because he's going to ruin that free ride they've been enjoying for all these years.
 
It's because people like Max Boot, Bill Kristol, Anne Coulter, etc. were never genuinely conservative in the first place. They put the mask on because election after election they were able to beat their hands on the table and demand a Conservative President who will, "Finally do X, just like we need!" and then when a Republican actually makes it into office they'll do nothing but scream about how much they hate them, and if a Democrat gets into office they'll do nothing but make excuses for them to try and find a "middle ground."

They're boot-licking snake oil salesmen who are furious because Trump tied the hose to the gravy fountain. If all of these problems they've been harping on about for more than a decade actually get fixed, then they're out of a job. They can't rile up a crowd about immigration or opiates or prison reform if the guy at the helm solves all the problems, and that's why they hate him. They were never here to fix any of these problems to begin with, they just wanted your money.

Those spineless pricks formed the foundation for "Principled Conservatism", which basically translates to, "Loser who bends over at the first sign of opposition, but he'll get a nice CNN fluff piece for conceding." America's political class--even all the way down to commentators like these idiots--came much, much closer to being a genuine "Uniparty" system than most people really understand. Hence, once someone stepped in who was completely disinterested in that, they all flew off the handle because he's going to ruin that free ride they've been enjoying for all these years.
Kristol and Boot showed their colors early on -- Kristol in particular I have a bit of an a-log boner for, considering he tried to screw up the election by pushing Egg McMuffin Evan McMullin.

But I'm deeply disappointed in Coulter, particularly as she was one of Trump's earlier supporters and had pointedly stated he had the best chances (much to the dumbfounded shock of Joy Behar and others, as seen in that clip with Bill Maher).
 
- from 'The America We Deserve', Donald Trump, 2000


- from 'Time to Get Tough, Donald Trump, 2011


- from 'Crippled America', Donald Trump, 2015

Reading all those excerpts, just makes me feel really bad for the guy. All of his words getting maligned into the negativity of the left. He knows it to be true...
 
Considering he just announced he's no longer a 'conservative' (which was news to people who didn't think he was anything of the sort anyways), I guess he's now evolving towards loving the D as in Democrat.

And the left loves "dunking on him" on twitter, because he has a "conservative" label, with the flawed logic typical of a leftist.

Oh, and the leftist "dunking" is every bit as cringeworthy as you imagine it would be. The best of it is them goofing on his stupid hat, and it's steeply downward from there.

https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/max-boot-twitter/

Why the Twitter left loves to dunk on Max Boot
 
They're boot-licking snake oil salesmen who are furious because Trump tied the hose to the gravy fountain. If all of these problems they've been harping on about for more than a decade actually get fixed, then they're out of a job. They can't rile up a crowd about immigration or opiates or prison reform if the guy at the helm solves all the problems, and that's why they hate him. They were never here to fix any of these problems to begin with, they just wanted your money.
So they're the Republican equivalent of the NAACP? It's painfully obvious for people like Bill Kristol and Rick Wilson, who both have to pander to their liberal buddies for ass pats and relevancy. Anne Coulter was a little less obvious in how she went at Trump from the more conservative angle. But it makes sense, seeing as how her books would suffer if they were the equivalent of an everything's okay alarm.
 
Kristol and Boot showed their colors early on -- Kristol in particular I have a bit of an a-log boner for, considering he tried to screw up the election by pushing Egg McMuffin Evan McMullin.

But I'm deeply disappointed in Coulter, particularly as she was one of Trump's earlier supporters and had pointedly stated he had the best chances (much to the dumbfounded shock of Joy Behar and others, as seen in that clip with Bill Maher).

With Coulter, I think she just has a habit of jumping the gun a bit. She wants Trump to be the president she always wanted, as opposed to what he is, and can't accept him for what he is. I like her nonetheless.

She's a cut far above Kristol, Boot, etc. and the National Review beta cru. They were never conservative, all they wanted were uncle tom gigs for the liberal media.
 
Last edited:
To Donald, the flyingest flier there is...

You must be the Democratic strategy planner.

"Okay we failed to stop the wall. The new plan is, the wall was almost finished, and Trump just put his name on it, Obama was the one who was doing all the real work."

Nah, I am a registered republican but I have decided to become an independent. Cause. I can't be apart of lunatics anymore.
 
Back