Well, first of all, thank you for answering my questions.
Now:
1. No society can survive women's suffrage.
Why not? What brings you to that conclusion? If you want to bring examples from history (and no hypothetical ones please), you have to consider that most states that ceased to be in the past weren't even remotely influenced or even dominated by a female ruler or a group consisting of females. There are multitudes of reasons as to why states or governments have failed. Why is women's suffrage (or women in positions of power) inherently bad for every society or every state?
Ancient Rome would probably instituted women's suffrage in its decline had it remained a democracy.
No, just no. Not even during the days of the Roman Republic was there something even remotely similar to women's suffrage.
So you could start counting them. US was doomed by 1920. Also, this is no feminist dictatorship. It's just government doing what it can to get female votes.
As far as I know, there are conservative women around, so I have to ask:
Does this apply to both conservative and progressive governments? (I ask because you seem to switch from liberal/progressive governments in particular to governments as a whole)
What is the thing that all women (i.e. the whole field, women who voted a far left party to women who voted a far right party) want to hear if you want their votes?
2. By enabling women in all parts of the workforce. How many women are housewives today?
Surprisingly many, as far as I remember. The main difference is that they settle down less often (and become fulltime housewives) and later than they used to in the past.
But one thing is correct: one of the main reasons women are an established part of a nation's workforce isn't so much feminist propaganda, but rather pragmatism of the nations that had almost all of their able-bodied males fighting and dying like flies in two world wars.
And I don't know if you can really compare the situation of a couple in the 1880s and nowadays. A lot of the devices that facilitate running the household weren't massproduced yet, so doing chores (and raising children) must have been a even bigger pain in the ass than it still is nowadays.
3. Liberalism appears in all decadent cultures.
Define "liberalism", please. Because it is pretty useless using a term that has been coined more than a millenium after that, when capitalism and welfare states came into existence.
Ancient Greeks were liberals and their last philosphers before fall to the Rome even claimed that men and women should dress the same.
Who do you mean? Athenians and Plato?
These developments signified the end of Ancient Greece.
Yeah, it probably wasn't the rise of Rome, but that...
It's all really liberalism.
The your entire concept of "liberalism" is a completely meaningless term.
Nobody questions things like women's suffrage. Dems-Reps, conservatives or social democrats, all the same.
The thing is this: personhood and the rights it entails is pretty much a given in most modern societies and one of the few things almost everybody would agree on.
If you want to deny it for one arbitrary part of society because you feel like it, you better present some good reasons for doing so.
Vast majority of children today are a result of seduction. This results in their atrocious quality.
"Quality" huh?
You have a very strange concept about how children grow up and learn things, I give you that.
I don't know how many of your fathers were a result of seduction and how many of providers but your grandfathers were still a result of providers and thus sane.
Why is being a "provider" and a "seducer" mutually exclusive?
As intelligence decreases
It doesn't.
