Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Question about exp- Not really. And I fucked experienced women.

I never said that men should be necessarily experienced, just that male virginity isn't needed before marriage and that men have stronger sexual urges.

But you've failed to give a rational response as to why the woman needs to be a virgin.

Hate to break it to you but women have sexual urges too. It's part of their biology. the only material/biological difference is that many women feel stronger sexual urges in a cyclical way, due to the way their hormones work. And even so that's not true of all women.

And you still haven't told us why you keep coming here. Let me guess, you have nothing else to do and this gives you a sense of importance? I hate to be rude but the more you ignore my question, the more I have to make assumptions based on your behaviour.

EDIT: For some reason the last sentence ran away
 
Women never had any autonomy. Today's women are the worst sex slaves in the world. Read
Derping about rape
I took the liberty of summarizing all that bullshit. You can thank me later.
As for me impregnating somebody
Don't worry, it'll never happen.
SHE AGREED TO VISIT ME AND WE'LL EVEN BE SPENDING THE NEW YEAR'S TOGETHER !
It's nice you mother would visit you in jail for the new year.
 
Women never had any autonomy. Today's women are the worst sex slaves in the world. Read

Many of us were conned into thinking that modern liberalism is about giving females the right to choose when they have sex. If they want to be sluts, that is their choice. If they want to be chaste until they are married and then remain faithful to their husbands, that is fine too. If at any given time they make bad choices, they can learn from their mistakes so in the end everyone is happy.

In fact, in practice nothing could be further from the truth. Liberalism in the context of modern society effectively imposes a wartime mass-rape situation on females, albeit by relatively subtle means.

Here is how the process works. Females derive virtually all their social status by virtue of their perceived sexual desirability. It follows that they will gain status by being associated with males of high sexual status and lose status by being associated with males of low sexual status. Therefore, over time, all females will gravitate to wanting to be sexually associated with a small percentage of males of high sexual status. As an aside, the males of high sexual status will largely be stupid assholes, given that they have high reproductive fitness in the context of modern society, as I explain in this thread.

It follows that every high status male will have several females pursuing him in order to derive social status by the interaction. Over time this means the males will feel inclined to demand immediate sex, since they will know that if one female doesn't give it up, another will. They will then be inclined to up the ante even further, demanding the most degrading sex acts that the Internet can cause them to come up with. In order to have any sexual status at all, which is to say in order to have any status at all, the females will have to play along.



Now, it is not within the female psyche to willingly forgo status and become a social outcast. This is not an option to the overwhelming majority of them. Therefore, once this process is in motion, they are simply along for the ride. They might have planned to be a virgin bride. They might hate every minute of every sex act they consent to. But if they need to do it to fit in, they will.

Hence Western females find themselves in a similar position to German females in 1945, when dim-witted Russian peasants were going around raping everyone in sight (or perhaps they have it a bit worse, given the suggestibility of Internet porn and their complicity in the process). What heavy artillery achieved then, liberalism backed by the resources of the state has achieved now. Effectively the females are being raped, not so much by the dirtbags sticking their dicks and what have you into their various orifices, but by the system and the sadistic animals behind it.

Well done libtards. This is the future you have bequeathed your daughters. If they do not currently have NO CHOICE but to submit to sex acts the likes of which you have never even dreamed of being performed on them by shitbags with exceptional individual-level IQs, then that soon will be their situation. Your values in action.
http://www.coalpha.org/The-sluts-have-no-choice-td7575216.html

As for me impregnating somebody, SHE AGREED TO VISIT ME AND WE'LL EVEN BE SPENDING THE NEW YEAR'S TOGETHER !

3rGUVY8.gif

So how many more times do you have to see this before you read it?
 
I'm reposting this from earlier @Holden.
I believed that rape is forceful sex against a woman's consent. I was wrong, since I didn't know enough history and was brainwashed my feminist propaganda. Rape is a crime against women's owner or her chastity and consent is irrelevant for women. In fact, should you expect it you're bound to be seen as a complete loser by a woman. All that anti-rape propaganda is actually aimed to keep dumbasses who believe women even want to consent away from getting any sex whatsoever.

So while I'd still forcibly have a sex with a woman I'd never rape, since I wouldn't have forcible sex with a woman who is somebody's property or chaste.

Holden, "I believe it is" does not equal "it is". I can believe that gingers are subhuman Cthulhu cultists, but I'll still be arrested if I kill a Ginger. I can believe that the US Government is illegitimate and has no authority, but that doesn't mean that a court will say "Well, he believes we have no authority, we can't convict him for shooting a Ginger."
I can believe I'm an autistic Fennic-Foxkin, but it doesn't mean I am one. In short:
Just because your definition of rape is something out of F.A.T.A.L doesn't mean you aren't a rapist.
Trying to claim that will end up a little like this:
(Seriously, a woman's "owner"? What the fuck, even fucking ISIS would tell you to chill out).
 
How long did the rape of German women last?
Too long.
How many people raped them on average?
Far, far too many. One is too many.
You'd see that an average slut has to do more scumbags in a week just so she could keep up in her popularity among other sluts.
No bedtime story. I'm going to count to three, and if you're not in bed, I'm taking away your stuffed tiger.
 
But you've failed to give a rational response as to why the woman needs to be a virgin.

Hate to break it to you but women have sexual urges too. It's part of their biology. the only material/biological difference is that many women feel stronger sexual urges in a cyclical way, due to the way their hormones work. And even so that's not true of all women.

And you still haven't told us why you keep coming here. Let me guess, you have nothing else to do and this gives you a sense of importance? I hate to be rude but the more you ignore my question, the mo
I have given a rational explanation. If you haven't seen it look it up. I know they have sexual urges too but not as strong as those of men. Why do I keep coming here? Because I want to leave a lot of material behind.
 
I know how I sound. But at what point does my reasoning go wrong?
Your reason only works in a warped bubble of reality where every person exists in a specific caste. It's not really the case. If you want a specific kind of woman, you need to find them. Stop blaming society for your personal shortcomings. Obama couldn't get people healthcare, what makes you think he can be your personal matchmaking service?
 
I have given a rational explanation. If you haven't seen it look it up. I know they have sexual urges too but not as strong as those of men. Why do I keep coming here? Because I want to leave a lot of material behind.


How can you claim anything you say is rational when you are so deluded that you cling to a made up fantasy world of incel?
 
Your reason only works in a warped bubble of reality where every person exists in a specific caste. It's not really the case. If you want a specific kind of woman, you need to find them. Stop blaming society for your personal shortcomings. Obama couldn't get people healthcare, what makes you think he can be your personal matchmaking service?
Null, you're over an year behind. I dropped that in Oct 2013. But at least you described it right.

As for the women, they're all the same really. Just in different herds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back