100% correct.
Long-form structured debate isn't a intellectual sparring match -- it's first to break, snap, show emotion, and fault to the degree that the other just dogpiles and disparages the other.
Nick has the advantage of not only verifiable logic, but experience and expertise in his profession.
Maybe he plans to try to blindside Nick and Emosh with something out of the gate.
Didn't stop her from lying to Mombot and bringing Weaponized Autistim Twitter to attention on how full of shit she is.
Yeah, she lied to Mombot because Lauren got confronted by her and decided to interpret the rules as allowing "temporary" suspension because "i'm not locked out forever. Which is bulllshit, and that why I brought up GAAS models of communities - like Lol, DOTA, Activizzard and the like;
The way the system is abused and structured to work is to hold you "personally" accountable for any and every say something affects someone else with 0 accountability of the realistic punishment and how to apply them.
Twitter uses the exact same structure of punishment, with the exact same weighted bias and reach around language;
It's designed to browbeat you into agreement. You're being forced to sign and date a document that makes it a foregone assumption that you're:
- Already guilty, by the ToS, EULA, Privacy Standards, and corporate interpretation of the "rules"
- Always responsible for someone else's opinion and actions -- that it's a community responsibility to not react when people commit to wasting time and holding people hostage and manipulating situations to be as pants on head stupid as possible
- An unstoppable toxicity stream for even daring to use the chat feature, let alone use sophisticated communication functions and higher game and metagame knowledge to recognize, debate, and apply the solved-and-fixed state of the game(s) to people who literally need to learn how to play.
" thats makes me feel warm inside.
Maybe we can get her Adsense profile / phone mass blocked.
archive.is
