It's not quite what you were asking for, but it's pretty fucking funny
View attachment 713568
Semi-related note: the #EqualPayDay hashtag is full of hilarious feminist salt about one of their favorite conspiracy theories.
I'll break down the strongest rebuttal I've come across to the claim that "women are paid less", quickly.
If a business had access to a labour pool willing to provide 1 unit of productivity for 0.78 units of pay (we'll call them "Group A"), as opposed to their current labour pool, which provide 1 unit of productivity for 1.00 of pay (we'll call them "Group B"), what business would logically neuter both their margins and their market share, by hiring the 2nd group?
The first company that hires exclusively from Group A has the capacity to lower the price on their product/service, guaranteeing better market penetration and thereby securing greater market share, while retaining the profit projections. They also have the advantage of being able to comb that pool for the best possible candidates, as the initiators of this hiring paradigm, and will force all competitors into choosing between less success/profitability, or also adopting the paradigm and hiring whatever's left in that labour pool.
Meanwhile, Group B is now unemployable, if they insist on being paid 1 unit of pay for 1.00 units of productivity; they either have to revise their wage expectations, or remain unemployable. If they choose to accept the lowered wage value, that new wage value is now the new wage constant, making it the new "1.00 pay unit".
There's no company in the world that would willingly give up additional profitability, market share, and RoI for their wage:productivity ratio.
Since it is
ALREADY illegal to engage in pay discrimination based on heritable characteristics, for the same work being done, that leaves no choice but to acknowledge that feminist claims of a wage gap are utterly false without even discussing the gross feminist misrepresentation of the actual data being examined, which ONLY shows a pay differential across all fields, without controlling for hours worked, educational attainment, non-monetary benefits (company healthcare, onsite childcare, etc.), schedule flexibility, and other critical factors.
Anyways, TL;DR, it's been illegal to underpay women for the same work as men for 50+ years, the market wouldn't ignore underpaying them if it were a possibility, and Equal Occupational Fatality Day is May 3, 2030, but I don't see any feminists starting sartorial campaigns to draw attention to
THAT gender inequality.
Since feminists are fond of demanding payment for "enlightening the unwoke", should I request donations to paypal or venmo, so I can be compensated for explaining simple economic forces and basic history?
).