The truth of the fight started by #SaveOurS*sk
by Patch O'Furr
Certain people, who rally behind a support hashtag for someone they say is falsely convicted, keep insisting on attacking me because I withdrew from contact with them months ago. They have taken it too far now while making violent threats. Anyone close to them should know the truth. It’s time to come out of my silence that they wouldn’t allow for peace. So why detach from them and their guest article months ago?
Proof is included, ignore it at the risk of self-sabotaging your own cause.
FIRST CLUE: Here’s a callout by the main rep of #SaveOurS*sk, to maliciously attack me while acting entitled to have me host their cause at the same time. It’s so dishonest. I never threatened this person (this isn’t the first time someone has twisted a non-threat into a threat). No messages were sent for any public audience — they blasted this out. I never called S*sk a “pedo”, I referred to attacks like that *
I was receiving from harassers* — *
on their behalf* — for hosting their article. Those attacks got escalated at me by this person, for no reason after I stopped talking to him in private, in return for getting my help while I was being their shit magnet by hosting their article.
They backstabbed me with the same thing I was shielding them from. They’re lying that I came back with some sort of revenge.
bottom text@CarcinLoring
https://twitter.com/CarcinLoring/status/1112352830147354624
Okay, I've suspended doubt long enough.
Want to know who
@DogPatchPress is as a person?
Well a year ago,
@Tailpoof risked a lot to write a DPP guest article to shed light on furry life in prison.
And because I didn't go along with his cub porn shit, he removed the article.
430
8:55 AM - Mar 31, 2019
322 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
SECOND CLUE: Originally I wrote that I don’t know the truth about how S*sk was convicted, but went ahead and helped because the treatment afterwards is it’s own issue. I still don’t have evidence, and it still is an issue. To repeat: I’m not attacking S*sk. But they say they don’t have the chat logs, and I’ll have no part in #SaveOurS*sk attacking a kid for “slutting” with loaded claims that the kid is the offender against an adult.
The claim is just a claim, from an emotionally-written campaign, with missing evidence but giving spin about it, with documents with pages cut off, with an
unreliable narrator (proof below).
King Ornod@Doodlenod
·
May 23, 2019
Replying to @Doodlenod and 5 others
Oh and add on sent them images in return
congrats furry fandom, lets free another danger to children its not like ones a mod on your biggest website as well
Aark@ScarfDragon
Except that Sisk isn’t a pedophile and anybody who actually takes the time to look at the details of the case can see it was a sham meant to get the 16 year old girl out of child pornographers charges from her slutting around on an adult-only chat room.
7
9:37 AM - May 23, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See Aark's other Tweets
THIRD CLUE: Here’s what unreliable narrator means. You’re going to want to think long and hard about the main rep of #SaveOurS*sk. Cognitive dissonance hurts, but it’s a real bad look to trust a twisted story like this. These sources show the original wording of their writers.
To my understanding, by the sources provided, S*sk is not in jail right now because of the original conviction. She’s in jail because this person cheated on his wife to deliberately break S*sk’s parole terms. Parole is a test and this person ended S*sk’s freedom with two forms of cheating. It happened before I knew these people. Blaming the system, me, and a kid is
really convenient when it’s a whole series of “somebody else’s faults” over years with changing stories like this.
Could it be that someone is just so desperate to change a bad situation that they’d lie to do it?
LAST CLUE: I was the “”media”” that listened to their persistent attempts to get traction with other powers who don’t want to comment. Look how they repaid my help. Now other media can think twice about stepping in my shoes.
Sometimes silence speaks louder than words — so it’s interesting how a certain lawyer, who’d be a perfect fit to talk about this, would only diplomatically decline to comment when asked. Which I should have done when asked in the first place, I see now.
Boozy Badger@BoozyBadger
https://twitter.com/BoozyBadger/status/1112406606740967424
I get DMs about
#saveoursisk regularly so I need to put this out there:
I cannot ethically comment on someone’s case without reviewing the court record, and would not seek to do so unless I was representing the person. Doing so results in more harm than good.
/1
62
12:29 PM - Mar 31, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See Boozy Badger's other Tweets
Want to blast the lawyer for keeping distance too?
As he says, commenting in such a case can hurt more than it helps. That cause doesn’t need a loud fan club online with all the damage they do. It needs specialist professionals. This cause isn’t my job and they’re not doing it well either. I helped, and now the more they attack, the more they shoot themselves in the foot.
None of this is about S*sk herself. I sympathize but I’m not going to fall on a sword for people doing more harm. Like I did by keeping silence for months.
All of this is why the article was withdrawn. Unreliability and backstabbing. I withdraw consent to be part of it.
I didn’t want to write anything else about this, and I held back instead of defending myself. Think about that next time people cook up a hateful mob, followed by a swarm of callout-clout-chasers like flies on shit, and have them threaten to “hit Dogpatch with a cinderblock”. (Report this tweet for violent threats, please.)
anyway the discourse of the day is I want to throw a cinderblock at dogpatch press
— Cat Movie (@sierra_bat)
May 28, 2019
They attacked me on and on, and I’m not sitting quietly for it any more.
I’m actually just one person, a fan, that’s how this fandom works. There is no institution for the stuff I do as a hobby for the love of it. That’s how they sucked me in and got my work that they couldn’t do alone. But I’m not their slave or janitor to clean up messes they make. And I highly fucking resent being treated as “selfish” for donating my labor and then setting my personal boundaries.
People have boundaries and consent. My choice to withdraw consent for contact with these people has been trashed. Don’t be self-entitled people who don’t know what “no” means, while representing an adult and claiming she was the victim of a kid.
By the way, I’ve never “defended” the “cub” art. I have made a few comments discussing smarter options to handle the problem of it, and hosted an article
*describing*arguments about it that calls it a dangerous abuse tool (which nobody read. Because they craved that sweet clout.) Just as their own campaign says the justice system doesn’t properly address real life sex offenses and there should be a variety of options.
Except I’ve never attacked a kid for “slutting” at an adult like they do. Hypocrites.
Feel free to send apologies if you helped stoke up this trash fire, but I’m not holding my breath. And don’t waste my time, I have work to do for another story to help with this issue that people think needs work, by request of parents and victims of a person who is facing charges for it.
If I wasn’t being attacked and trashed unreasonably, they could have had this effort for their cause. None of this would have been necessary if they had just gone on their way when I withdrew.
They can stop the lying now, go hire specialists they desperately need, and leave me alone.
PUBLISHED:
May 28, 2019
FILED UNDER:
Uncategorized
ququ-media.com
See Aark's other Tweets
