http://archive.fo/Cjj2q kristi starts the tweet chain off
http://archive.fo/o6ekB Sam swicegood replies by saying he knows two "victims" personally who were "assaulted"
http://archive.fo/QOSLl admits that he is a sexual assault victim and "knows the difference"
http://archive.fo/Jyqa5 admits that the cases he is referencing supposedly happened in Canada
http://archive.fo/gsdaH Sam Swicegood tries to claim that kissing constitutes sexual assault
http://archive.fo/xrwp9 Sam Swicegood "doesn't have to prove a god damn thing to you"
http://archive.fo/pQagW Sam claims Kristi deleted a tweet, then links a justice department website
http://archive.fo/2h9SY Sam says that any unwanted touching is "sexual assault"
http://archive.fo/SBtIn Sam alludes to a defamation case where he will finally share his information during.
http://archive.fo/cILZU Sam knows two people who were assaulted and beleives them
http://archive.fo/fQK1Z Sam tells someone to stop trying to interpret statuatory code unless they are an attorney
http://archive.fo/l6I59 says that the sexual assault happened in Canada again and cites the California Justice department code again, for some reason he is not referencing Canada law
http://archive.fo/B3nkU Sam Swicegood declares that his friends are seeking court remedies
http://archive.fo/ZiEEw Sam Swicegood once again says you have to be an attorney to interpret law and says that doing so without being one is UPL Unlicenced Practice of Law
http://archive.fo/ffiTh Sam says jurisdcition matters, (likely a precursor to the first stages of the case, good chance the defendants try to get the jurisdiction moved to another more favorable jurisdiction.)
http://archive.fo/YZVAa Sam Swicegood tries to tell us more about UPL since he's a paralegal and can interret law FOR US even though he said him self you need to be an ATTORNEY
http://archive.fo/9qxG6 Sam Swicegood does not want this shared.... ha ha ha
http://archive.fo/cywJb Sam Swicegood "you didn't prove anything at all because my friends don't live in Texas."
http://archive.fo/d4y6s Sam Swicegood expounds on UPL for us further by saying that if you are trying to say something isn't UPL is probably a form of UPL
http://archive.fo/CmvqL Sam Swicegood starts using the terms "generally and situationally" and declares he is only linking to the law, not quotting it.
http://archive.fo/IrPcH Sam Swicegood declares that Kristi is trying to interpret things for other law sets with Texas law, but at least he can't speak for Rekeita's interpretation
http://archive.fo/kTOOJ Sam Swicegood: "Do you...do you know what paralegals
do?"
http://archive.fo/mY8P7 Sam Swicegood can now not "CONFIRM" anything because he isn't representing his friends.
http://archive.fo/cfNEP Sam Swicegood reiterates his point of proving a Canadian Violation with Texas law, (even though he has only cited California state law thus far)
http://archive.fo/vcl9x Sam Swicegood declares that Kristi gave an irrelevant definition be citing Texas State Law
http://archive.fo/QM7if Sam Swicegood stands by what he said, "he assaulted them"
http://archive.fo/eWYQq Sam Swicegood says he doesn't work FOR lawyers
http://archive.fo/nigVY Sam Swicegood seeks to clarify after the fact by saying that it is assault everywhere, but only "sexual" assaults in some states.
http://archive.fo/1dJpb Sam Swicegood says he "is not seeing anything about Vic suing people"
http://archive.fo/Jyqa5 Sam Swicegood says it was in Canada again,thats why he posted the laws he did (but he posted California law.)
http://archive.fo/LcbMD Saw lets a fairly sick burn slip past him due to his lack of understanding
http://archive.fo/2gopS Sam Swicegood brings up the "i was raped" point again and adds more details by saying he was 11 when it happened
http://archive.fo/KTsIh Sam Swicegood is keeping a counter now "for the 9th time it was in Canada!"
http://archive.fo/eETn8 "for the 9th time canada"
http://archive.fo/n5ogE "for the 10th time, my friend was not assaulted in TExas." (friends has turned into singular friend here now, maybe he lost a friend during this exchange?)
http://archive.fo/BhFVt "There you go. Blame the Victim, thats cool."
http://archive.fo/LkFAg "So it's my Fault then?"
http://archive.fo/rXje4 "this is Twitter, not a courtroom, I'm not giving testimony."
http://archive.fo/IWCuw "The same reason many assaults go unreported. Fear of retribution and not being believed."
http://archive.fo/EpEXy "You can believe whatever the fuck you want to. I don't have to prove anything to you."
http://archive.fo/6bTN8 "You remind me of a neighbor who once asked me "Why didn't you tell the police when you were raped?" And I replied "Would you have believed me then?" And they didn't answer."
http://archive.fo/pYHyd "As I've said before, my friend already went to the police as far as I know." (this is important because it's the first time he makes this claim)
http://archive.fo/RHlYX "Doing nothing reflects badly on you."More victim-blaming. "It's your fault for not saying anything."
http://archive.fo/xQXO2 "You just took victim blaming up a new level."
http://archive.fo/pcWE8 "When you taking #victimblaming to a new fucking level.
https://twitter.com/GhostShellZen/status/1115387416033091590 "
http://archive.fo/J5ZPK "So it's my fault then. Great. Thanks."
http://archive.fo/aLZfN "There aren't, actually."
http://archive.fo/HeUVh Sam Swicegood tries to flip the conversation around by climing the person admitted that Vic committed a crime.
http://archive.fo/rLivf Sam tries to clarify who he is talking to since he is juggling a few conversation threads at this point
http://archive.fo/V8T9l Sam Swicegood says he is "helping the truth" while other people are trying to blame him with a crime by failing to report an assault when he supposdely knew about it.
http://archive.fo/vVWx1 Sam tries to throw out a red herring as he takes the canadian laws that people are citing him and claiming that he is incenuating that the "victims" he spoke of are children.
http://archive.fo/mOTzo "They weren't minors."
http://archive.fo/cyAcP "You cannot both say Vic didn't commit a crime and also accuse me of not reporting a crime."
http://archive.fo/HpdFE Sam Swicegood seems to incenuate that people are making things up by saying the crime was a hug and a kiss on the cheeek even though earlier he was arguing that an unwanted kiss was assault.
http://archive.fo/pWSBt "So we're clear: if you try to kiss and hug someone who does not want to be kisses or hugged (and who does not give consent to that), that is still sexual assault in many states as well as Canada."
http://archive.fo/yLcvK "You don't look a police officer to me."
http://archive.fo/zu8r5 "Hang on, did you just say that Twitter is some kind of police?" Sam is throwing out another Red Herring trying to take the conversation in a different direction
http://archive.fo/jfK8Y Sam Swicegood tries to use this conversation thus far to claim that an assaut has been proven.
http://archive.fo/45HRf "Wow, you really think so? That they are equally guilty?"
archive.li
for the archiving job
