Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

TheSoutherStar said:
more spoiled tard cum

View attachment 725367

http://archive.fo/T7oQe
Click to expand...
with this mentality I guess killing someone is justifiable.


Officer you see, all this evidence that points it to me doesn't mean you will press charges one me.
Is it possible? sure.
Are you saying you will? sure.
But right now there is no charges being placed upon me so I am not being charged (ever) with murder of any degree.

Yeah, seem legit lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zero Day Defense, Army Burger and TheSoutherStar
Captain Manning said:
In every jurisdiction I'm aware of, you can actually throw the fucking thing at them. No signature required. At least that's the case here in Arizona (I was thinking of becoming one, and discussed that about a billion pages ago... I think @AnOminous probably remembers). The legal system is well aware some people are gonna try to get out of being served, so they don't make the requirements too onerous.
Click to expand...
When you're actually serving them, yes. You can literally throw it at them, drop it in front of them, whatever. Pretty much the only requirements are: positively I.D. them, put the papers in their presence, inform them that they've been served.

The "positively I.D. them" thing is the part that would be a problem if you're trying to serve someone by mail, because their mail carrier probably couldn't (or wouldn't want to) do that unless the person had answered their door, said "yes, that's me", and signed for it.
 
AStupidMonkey said:
Oh, man, THESE idiots? In a Texas deposition? I can't wait to see how their SJW logic fucks them with no lube.

Now, of course, that means their lawyers get to depose people like Vic and Nick. How do we think they'll try and gotcha 'em?

"This is exhibit 9, a livestream in which you have a contract from Kameha Con-"

"I never said it was from Kameha Con."

"Did you know at the time it breaches the contract to disclose it?"

"It wasn't signed or executed."

etc etc etc.
Click to expand...

How would they be able to depose Nick? The court's not going to allow that unless there is a specific reason. Being a Meany Lawyer on the Internet doesn't open him up to discovery. He is functioning as a law journalist as regards his podcasts.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Not A Bug and Burnout
TheSoutherStar said:
more spoiled tard cum

View attachment 725367

http://archive.fo/T7oQe

edit: just to add more context, this jarlent faggot is one of those who tried to debating nick after the disaster known as shane, also this is the only way for me to lazily archive both his tweets (the initial exceptional comment and his double down reply to baddragonite0)
Click to expand...
Username is "Bad Dragonite." Taking bets: Pokemon fan, or reptillian dildo aficionado? I've got 2:1 on both.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
Reactions: damian, Archeops, Zero Day Defense and 5 others
Kosher Salt said:
When you're actually serving them, yes. You can literally throw it at them, drop it in front of them, whatever. Pretty much the only requirements are: positively I.D. them, put the papers in their presence, inform them that they've been served.

The "positively I.D. them" thing is the part that would be a problem if you're trying to serve someone by mail, because their mail carrier probably couldn't (or wouldn't want to) do that unless the person had answered their door, said "yes, that's me", and signed for it.
Click to expand...
Think Nick found it one stream once and you can mail it. Same day mailing ftw?
 
RodgerDodger said:
Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but from reading on how things get served in Texas, it can be served by first class mail or delivery service such as Fed Ex. Service is considered to have occurred when it is handed over to the mail system etc. So the Court assumes the Mail is going to get there.
Click to expand...

Apparently in Texas you can do service of process via mail, yes. Nick verified this. It's another thing Shane is wrong about.

But, I guess, in fairness to Shane (har har), there are a lot of other states that DON'T allow that, and I actually didn't know it until Nick brought it up.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: RodgerDodger, Army Burger, ScorpioAssassin and 1 other person
Captain Manning said:
In every jurisdiction I'm aware of, you can actually throw the fucking thing at them. No signature required. At least that's the case here in Arizona (I was thinking of becoming one, and discussed that about a billion pages ago... I think @AnOminous probably remembers). The legal system is well aware some people are gonna try to get out of being served, so they don't make the requirements too onerous.

This is a movie, but it's not that far off from the truth:

Click to expand...

Being a process server sounds like a fun side gig for a person who enjoys trolling.
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: damian, RodgerDodger, Not A Bug and 3 others
RodgerDodger said:
How would they be able to depose Nick? The court's not going to allow that unless there is a specific reason. Being a Meany Lawyer on the Internet doesn't open him up to discovery. He is functioning as a law journalist as regards his podcasts.
Click to expand...
That might be a little :optimistic:. Nick is very much involved, and often makes statements directed at the defendants in a tortious interference case. All they have to convince the judge is that the deposition may lead to information relevant to their defense.

What's NOT :optimistic: is that Nick is a lawyer, and probably knows every possible out regarding a Texas court trying to depose a lawyer from Minnesota who's not named in the charges. I suspect he'd only go if he really wanted to. And he'd probably have the defense paying for his time and travel expenses if he did.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: damian, RodgerDodger, Not A Bug and 3 others
725372

Sabat's face right about when he realizes that he's probably just as fucked as Ron and Monica.

In case anyone was wondering this is one of the characters he played in Burst Angel, right before he get's run through with a wooden sword.

EDIT: Caitlyn Glass' commentary on this scene was "Die Sabat! Die!"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: I Love Beef, RodgerDodger, REGENDarySumanai and 7 others
mindlessobserver said:
Being a process server sounds like a fun side gig for a person who enjoys trolling.
Click to expand...
no comments

mindlessobserver said:
Being a process server sounds like a fun side gig for a person who enjoys trolling.
Click to expand...
Once I had to serve a guy that was a car salesman. Went on a test drive with him. Gave him the papers on the side of the high way and got in my friends waiting car.
 
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: King Mob, Splendid, damian and 9 others
AStupidMonkey said:
That might be a little :optimistic:. Nick is very much involved, and often makes statements directed at the defendants in a tortious interference case. All they have to convince the judge is that the deposition may lead to information relevant to their defense.

What's NOT :optimistic: is that Nick is a lawyer, and probably knows every possible out regarding a Texas court trying to depose a lawyer from Minnesota who's not named in the charges. I suspect he'd only go if he really wanted to. And he'd probably have the defense paying for his time and travel expenses if he did.
Click to expand...
Nick isn't Defaming them. They would only be forced to prove Vic is a predator and Nick wouldn't have any reason being brought up in the court case. Assuming they do try and bring him up to bring into question Vic's credibility it would be quite unlikely that the judge would care as it doesn't pertain to Vic's case about defamation and Tortuous interference.

Nick would only be brought in if Monica was dropped from KC without her dropping it (same with the other ones) but considering that's not the case it's even more doubtful a judge would care.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Zero Day Defense, Male Idiot, LobotomizedFerret and 2 others
OldAmishRenegade said:
75-90 is a lot more than I expected, but is pathetic compared to if VIc had been in that shop.
Click to expand...

Vic wouldn't be legally allowed in the shop because if he tried to fit his line in there it would break the fire laws within five minutes.

GrotesqueBushes said:
Imagine waking up, you wash your ass, get your cup of coffee and walk out the door only to trip over a dying mailman. The light in his eyes is fading, his spine is contorted into some weird arcane sigil that makes your eyes sting as you look at it. He's being crushed by a cinderblock packed in a manila envelope, and your name is on it for some reason. As you rip open the packaging you discover it's not a cinderblock, but the 800 tweets you've sent since last Wednesday printed out, with a cover letter from a Texan law firm stating AYO BITCH NIGGA YOU FUCKED, WE'LL RUN A TRAIN ON YOU IN COURT in flawless legalese.
Click to expand...

How many more must Nick and Ty kill before their bloodlust is sated?

TheSoutherStar said:
more spoiled tard cum

View attachment 725367

http://archive.fo/T7oQe

edit: just to add more context, this jarlent faggot is one of those who tried to debating nick after the disaster known as shane, also this is the only way for me to lazily archive both his tweets (the initial exceptional comment and his double down reply to baddragonite0)
Click to expand...

It's interesting to see the difference between what little support kickvic still has on Twitter and reality. Not just the massive lines that would bury this guy's tweets in a second just by posting 'waiting in line selfies', but this guy insisting 'I can't see the lawsuit so it doesn't exist' juxtaposed with Ty candidly informing Nick on the phone that "normally we say 'if you retract these, we may not sue'. We didn't say that this time. We are going to sue him."
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Maraschino, Zero Day Defense, In Heaven and 4 others
Son of Sparda 84 said:
Toye not being scared can be answered in two ways

A. He has some super secret evidence that he has on Vic and he is going release shortly

B. He's clueless as fuck
Click to expand...
or
C assumes that Funimation's investigation proves Vic is a sexual predator so his 'defamation' claims become valid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back