Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Yes, Ron countless “victims” will flood into the court room to testify under oath, the threat of perjury and the Amazon’s presence. Surely they want to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not A Bug
Of course because they can't have any old shmuck just waltz up to the stand and say whatever they want without anything to corroborate it.
Because if that's the case, I can walk up to the stand right now and claim that Soye raped me and his ass would be in jail. Badda bing badda boom. I would have rid the world of one less cuckold. I will accept your praises now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snackbar hero, Kosher Salt, The Demon Pimp of Razgriz and 2 others
Vampy said:
I wonder how many kiwis and lawyers will become weebs by the end of this case.
Click to expand...

I wonder how many kiwis and weebs will become lawyers after this case.

Dopey Cunt said:
What in the-

Testimony alone is not sufficient enough proof. There needs to be EVIDENCE. ACTUAL, FACTUAL EVIDENCE. Police reports or videos.

He's still going. He actually believes a bunch of randos coming forward with made up testimonies will be enough for the court. This is so exceptional, truly. I am blessed.
Click to expand...

Testimony is actually admissible in court as evidence.

Thing is, it's sworn testimony that's allowed as evidence. For example, Vic has to provide a sworn statement in his case wherein he challenges the accusations levied against him, and bam, the burden of proof shifts to the defendants. Even though it's evidence, it still has to be weighed against the established facts and other evidences.

Some bints screaming on Twitter about how Vic sexually harassed twelve million women and children including them is not admissible evidence, precisely because it's not sworn-- the presumption is that if you can get lit on fire for perjury (which happens when you deliberately and shamelessly lie against the facts in a deposition or affidavit), you might be more inclined to tell the truth.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Kosher Salt, The Incel Whisperer, Burnout and 7 others
Dopey Cunt said:
I think I remember Jamie Marchi getting caught saying they actually knew nobody who would testify and that she HOPED that someone would either get victimized or volunteer themselves to put their neck on the chopping block to make up a fake testimony to save their asses.

You know because lying under oath doesn't carry any consequences at all. Oh wait, I forgot these speds actually believe all their made up bullshit. That has to count for something, right?

RIGHT?
Click to expand...
A child. She hoped that a child had been sexually assaulted because then the statute of limitations is suspended, and everyone that she "knows" that Vic "went after" waited too long to come forward and say anything. She hoped that a child would come forward, remember their trauma enough to tell the court of law, go through more trauma just going through a court case. A child that would have been traumatized in the first place because, if we listen and believe Marchi, she either knew or was suspicious that Vic was going after underage girls, and did nothing.

These bitches are not only stupid, they're malicious as fuck, and they don't get to stand up on their moral victim horse and berate us when we call them out on being full of shit.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Next Task, Kosher Salt, damian and 16 others
My understanding is that eyewitness testimony can be used as evidence, but only if it's sworn under oath, and it's relevant (So there can't be testimony about how Vic is serial french kisser, boob groper, and kicks puppies; it's only relevant if, say, they witnessed Vic humping Marchi or whatever).

Or am I wrong.

Zero Day Defense said:
I wonder how many kiwis and weebs will become lawyers after this case.
Click to expand...
Won't lie, I've learned more about law because of Vic than I did in school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt and Recoil

Chairman of Anime Matsuri congratulating Vic on kamehacon success.

727997
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Kosher Salt, damian, OldAmishRenegade and 18 others
OneHandClapping said:
My understanding is that eyewitness testimony can be used as evidence, but only if it's sworn under oath, and it's relevant (So there can't be testimony about how Vic is serial french kisser, boob groper, and kicks puppies; it's only relevant if, say, they witnessed Vic humping Marchi or whatever).

Or am I wrong.


Won't lie, I've learned more about law because of Vic than I did in school.
Click to expand...

And it generally, with few exceptions, must be subjected to cross examination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt
Dopey Cunt said:
I think I remember Jamie Marchi getting caught saying they actually knew nobody who would testify and that she HOPED that someone would either get victimized or volunteer themselves to put their neck on the chopping block to make up a fake testimony to save their asses.

You know because lying under oath doesn't carry any consequences at all. Oh wait, I forgot these speds actually believe all their made up bullshit. That has to count for something, right?

RIGHT?
Click to expand...
IIRC, there was some doubt over the validity of the message and whether it had been edited or not. If it IS real... dark days are ahead for Marchi.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: damian, Pina Colada, Vampy and 1 other person
Zero Day Defense said:
I wonder how many kiwis and weebs will become lawyers after this case.



Testimony is actually admissible in court as evidence.

Thing is, it's sworn testimony that's allowed as evidence. For example, Vic has to provide a sworn statement in his case wherein he challenges the accusations levied against him, and bam, the burden of proof shifts to the defendants. Even though it's evidence, it still has to be weighed against the established facts and other evidences.

Some bints screaming on Twitter about how Vic sexually harassed twelve million women and children including them is not admissible evidence, precisely because it's not sworn-- the presumption is that if you can get lit on fire for perjury (which happens when you deliberately and shamelessly lie against the facts in a deposition or affidavit), you might be more inclined to tell the truth.
Click to expand...
I mean in the case where Vic does just that. Then the burden of proof shifts over to them and that's when they'll hit a wall. Because they will then need to actually prove their testimonies with additional facts and evidence to back it up. Their problem is that they didn't think that Vic would fight back and say "no". Just by him saying that and swearing by it, now he gets to sit pretty while he watches #kickvic squirm and scramble to pull anything out of their butts so avoid being caught lying.

Sometimes I look at all this going on and think: "Boy it sucks to be an actual victim these days. You have a bunch of twitter spergs dragging your victimhood all over the muck because they want to play pretend victim in the faces of actual victims."

Sad days indeed.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius, damian, KingofNothing and 6 others
Dopey Cunt said:
Sometimes I look at all this going on and think: "Boy it sucks to be an actual victim these days. You have a bunch of twitter spergs dragging your victimhood all over the muck because they want to play pretend victim in the faces of actual victims."

Sad days indeed.
Click to expand...

We are at the point where anyone is a target for anything they say or do and the only 'trigger' that will set the mob off is the random feelings of one mentally unstable SJW. Society cannot function like that.

The light at the end of the tunnel is that eventually reality will reassert itself and these animals will be remembered by history much like their witch hunting brethren.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: damian, Exterminatus, Private Pyle and 2 others
Dopey Cunt said:
Sometimes I look at all this going on and think: "Boy it sucks to be an actual victim these days. You have a bunch of twitter spergs dragging your victimhood all over the muck because they want to play pretend victim in the faces of actual victims."

Sad days indeed.
Click to expand...
That's the kind of people that sjws and special snowflakes hurt the most honestly: those who actually have those issues. Think about how many people may just avoid a trans person because they have met crazy trannys and it's just not worth the risk to deal with this one.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius, Kosher Salt, Solo Wing Pixy and 1 other person
R.A.E.L. said:
...A fucking jellybean. Monica, you're insane.
Click to expand...

Let me give you a preview of the narrative.

"Yes that was just one story but you don't SAY things like that to a coworker."

"It was just one out of thousands of constant sexually perverted comments. I felt unsafe."

"It's Male Privilege to think suggesting you would rape a woman via oral sex in front of fans is OK. It is NOT OK!"
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Deinonychus, damian, ChevroletBlackboard and 12 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back