Chris-Chan Sighting at Gamestop (With Video)

Status
Not open for further replies.
CountOlaf said:
Why DID he mace that employee anyway? It doesn't look like he was coming at Chris at all. Chris was leaving, and he just. . .randomly pepper sprays him. I"m just trying to figure out the reasoning behind it. Yeah, I know considering this is Chris we're talking about that's a futile effort, but I can't help but wonder.
Click to expand...
He might have been the employee who said he was calling the Jerkops. But even if he wasn't, a GS employee called the Jerkops on him, so they're all conspiring against him so are MALE JERKS!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gawker and Count Olaf
He has a tongue flick now like Brendan Gleeson in Harry Potter/Hank Schrader in Breaking Bad.
 
MrsFrizzle said:
Are they tan Uggs (or K-Mart versions of same)? The knee-length denim skirt was what caught my eye. It made Chris look like a superannuated Christian homeschooler.
Click to expand...

Ugg boots are probably too high end for Chris. More likely it's some knock off he found at Good Will, because Godbear forbid he put any effort into anything, even his much vaunted transvestitism. Besides, I doubt he knows anything about fashion or pop culture beyond copying a 70 year old bag lady
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GoldfishGroup, Stud2Stud, Konstantinos and 2 others
Mogambo said:
Ugg boots are probably too high end for Chris. More likely it's some knock off he found at Good Will, because Godbear forbid he put any effort into anything, even his much vaunted transvestitism. Besides, I doubt he knows anything about fashion or pop culture beyond copying a 70 year old bag lady
Click to expand...
One benefit of switching to the female gender is you can find a lot more options for cheap clothes at Goodwill.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: MrsFrizzle
Was Chris simply blowing a raspberry at the video-man? Or trying to spittle on him?
 
April_2014_Target_sighting.jpg
These are Uggs? I thought they were loose and fluffy, like sheepskin slippers.
 
Last edited:
People have been saying the guy said to Chris, "You're too tense", and that's why he got sprayed - but rewatching the video over and over and over, I'm not sure that isn't one of the guys at the register giving a total as "Forty-two ten".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Kecleon, Surtur, what0908 and 4 others
MACH-IV said:
Cops gonna throw another innocent white male lesbo in jail. It's Ferguson times ten.
Click to expand...
Oh god, an SJW riot inadvertently started by Chris would be just the thing to get 2015 off on a great start.
And Charlottesville isn't that far away. I could grab some buddies of mine and some beers and go mock the tumblrites. Sounds like a fun day.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Meowthkip, GoldfishGroup, 4-Cent Barbage and 7 others
Randall Fragg said:
Oh god, an SJW riot inadvertently started by Chris would be just the thing to get 2015 off on a great start.
And Charlottesville isn't that far away. I could grab some buddies of mine and some beers and go mock the tumblrites. Sounds like a fun day.
Click to expand...
The sad truth is, Chris has done more "activism" in this one Gamestop than most SJWs will ever do. One thousand retweets on tumblr is nothing like going outside into the real world and fighting for your cause - even if the cause is the color of Sonic's arms.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Meowthkip, GoldfishGroup, Fantasma and 20 others
Danzou said:
People have been saying the guy said to Chris, "You're too tense", and that's why he got sprayed - but rewatching the video over and over and over, I'm not sure that isn't one of the guys at the register giving a total as "Forty-two ten".
Click to expand...
Whoever says "you're too tense" or "forty-two ten" sounds a lot closer to the camera than the guy Chris sprays.
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: GoldfishGroup, asperhes, Silver and 3 others
KatsuKitty said:
Those of you who think Chris is getting a free lawyer, you're dead wrong.

Courts are under no obligation to provide you a lawyer if you have any method at all to finance one. Being a homeowner is often enough to preclude you from qualifying for a public defender since you can simply sell the home instead of draw from the taxpayer pool.

Although Chris is not a homeowner, he does live with Barb (who is), and the court may see that she can sell her home to finance her son's legal defence. So it's entirely plausible that if Chris and Barb are completely unable to pay for Bell's representation once again, they may not have any lawyer at all.
Click to expand...

I feel I'm stating the obvious here, but the Virginia state code needs to be analyzed before a statement on his right to counsel is made.

Here in the states the defendant has a right to counsel in a criminal trial, but not a civil trial (as per the Sixth Amendment).

Now, you are on the right track by stating that the finances of an indigent defendant will be looked into. Section 19.2-160 of the Virginia codes deals with the right to counsel, and it basically says that, "In the absence of a waiver of counsel by the accused, and if he shall claim that he is indigent, the court shall proceed in the same manner as is provided in Section 19.2.-159."

Reading into Section 19.2-159 for a bit it states, "In making its finding, the court shall determine whether or not the accused is a current recipient of a state or federally funded public assistance program for the indigent. If the accused is a current recipient of such a program and does not waive his right to counsel or retain counsel on his own behalf, he shall be presumed eligible for the appointment of counsel." The code also says it will consider, "All assets of the accused which are convertible into cash within a reasonable period of time without causing substantial hardship or jeopardizing the ability of the accused to maintain home and employment."

Since many are leaning on the idea that he may end up with assault charges, it would be plausible for CWC to have the right to counsel (due to his tugboat monies). While, a plain reading of the statute leads me to believe that they wouldn't force the family to sell their home to pay for counsel expenses in the criminal context (taking into account their shit finances as it is). Of course, assault may be tried in the civil context, and that takes the right to counsel out of the equation.
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Meowthkip, Scribbler, Adamska and 11 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back