- Joined
- May 22, 2016
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's the lobotomy survivors forumIs PULL like some kind of social network for mental asylums and exceptional individual housing? You can't sign up unless your caregiver does it for you or something?
How do you figure? The screenshot shows the mall basically replied "we didn't know that when we booked him, we'll take it into consideration," and then it cancelled Vic's event. That seems like a clear-cut example of TI with contract... there was a contract, they knew of the contract and intentionally interfered with it, and the only question is whether any damages were caused. I would imagine that there were damages, since the event was canceled and Vic had to find a different venue at the last minute.Again, I doubt it can be considered TI
I don't think any of them made it out.It's the lobotomy survivors forum
Lobotomy experimentees forum, then.I don't think any of them made it out.
Dunno. Thinking about it more, it does fit the four criteria for tortoise interference, with damages being the shakey one.How do you figure? The screenshot shows the mall basically replied "we didn't know that when we booked him, we'll take it into consideration," and then it cancelled Vic's event. That seems like a clear-cut example of TI with contract... there was a contract, they knew of the contract and intentionally interfered with it, and the only question is whether any damages were caused. I would imagine that there were damages, since the event was canceled and Vic had to find a different venue at the last minute.
Depending on what specifically they told the mall, it probably could've also been defamatory, but you'd need to get your hands on that email to prove it.
It's the lobotomy survivors forum
And yet you keep shitting your pants about it
"The document is long and therefore good"
This latest filing from Casey was so bad that I could see the issues just on the face of the facts. I'm no lawyer, hell I don't know how to defend a parking ticket, but I can look at the factual statements in Casey's filings and see clearly where he gets basic facts wrong. That's ignoring the fact that every single lawyer I've heard from who've looked at this case are all saying the same thing; "This is bad for the defense."
It's part of why I hope more people start suing these cretins. They aren't smart enough to hide their gayops, partly because they're fucking retarded, and partly because they think "oh this will never get used against us/me anyway" even when it's the kind of evidence a prosecuting lawyer would cream themselves over possessing in a civil/criminal case. It doesn't even matter if you flat out tell them "yo this could totally be used in a court case against you" because they won't believe you even as a process server is knocking on their front door.Kickvic continuing to be exceptional individuals who break the law and document the evidence. All for a moment of brief attention.
God, that is some strong projection right there.
View attachment 779205
Another idiot who knows nothing about the legal system gives their misguided view on things.
The defense is egging on a bunch of incels to harass the plaintiff