Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Lol, she talks about the Battle of the Bulge but likely doesn't know what it is.

Unless she means she's trying very hard to overcome her metaphorical massive boner for Trump by pretending she hates him, like Standard Romcom Plot #2.

More likely she's referring to her gut that's pressing agonizingly against her shapewear.
 
https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/05/politics/cnn-poll-trump-prediction-economy-issues/index.html

http://archive.li/2teOT

CNN Poll: Rising share expect Trump to win in 2020

Washington (CNN) - A majority of Americans say they think Donald Trump is going to win a second term, according to a CNN Poll conducted by SSRS, even as the President's reviews on issues other than the economy remain largely negative.

The new poll finds 54% say their best guess is that Trump will win the 2020 election, 41% feel he will lose. Americans are slightly more apt to say Trump will win now than they were to say Barack Obama would win a second term in May 2011, in a survey conducted just after the death of Osama bin Laden (50% thought Obama would win in that poll). The new numbers on Trump are a reversal from December, when a narrow majority of 51% said they thought Trump would lose his bid for re-election.

The shift over that time comes mostly among those who disapprove of Trump's handling of the presidency. In December, 81% in that group said they thought the President would lose, and now, that's fallen to 67%. At the same time, the share who approve of the President and think he will win has held mostly steady (88% now vs. 85% in December).

RELATED: Full poll results

The dislike those disapprovers hold for Trump is palpable in the poll. Asked to explain in their own words why they disapprove of Trump, Trump's behavior is a central reason. The most frequently cited responses are lying (13%), racism (11%), incompetence (11%) and not acting presidential (7%). Immigration, named by 7%, is the only specific issue that merits mention by 5% or more.

Those who approve of the way Trump is handling his job as President instead focus on his accomplishments and on issues. About a quarter (26%) cite the economy as the main reason they back him, 12% say it's because he has kept his promises, 9% say that he's getting things done or accomplishing more than other presidents, 8% mention improved unemployment ratings and 5% point to his policies on the border.

The economy remains the bright spot of Trump's presidency in public opinion. Overall, 7 in 10 say the economy is in good shape, about the same as in March, and 52% say they approve of Trump's handling of the economy, down 4 points since April. This poll marks a new high point in the Trump presidency for the share who feel the economy is in "very good" shape, 28% say so, and though that's not significantly larger than the 26% who felt that way in March, it is the best mark since 2000.

Trump's second-best approval rating in the poll comes on an economy-connected measure: helping the middle class. On that score, 44% approve of the President, 49% disapprove. While still negative, that's an improvement compared with the last time CNN surveyed on this question in August of the first year of his presidency, when 39% approved.

Foreign trade earns the President fewer accolades, with 41% saying they approve while 47% disapprove. The poll was in the field when the President threatened new tariffs on imports from Mexico in response to illegal border crossings from that country. While those figures are not significantly different from the President's approval ratings on this topic in December, his approval rating on foreign trade has grown 9 points over that time among a core constituency: Whites who do not have college degrees.

On immigration, Americans also give the President a 41% approval rating, with a higher disapproval rating (54%) than he earns for his trade policies.

Turning to foreign policy, the President's reviews are also largely negative. On his handling of North Korea, Americans' opinions have shifted from positive (48% approve to 40% disapprove) to negative (41% approve and 45% disapprove) over the last year. Disapproval outweighs approval for his handling of the situation with Iran, 43% to 32%. And more disapprove (48%) than approve (42%) of his handling of the role of commander-in-chief.

Still, Americans' perceptions of the threat posed by Iran and North Korea has declined over the last year. In a May 2018 poll, 47% said they considered North Korea a "very serious threat to the United States," now, just 34% feel the same way, the lowest number in CNN polls since 2015. The same 2018 poll found 40% viewed Iran as a very serious threat. That has fallen to 28% in the new poll, the smallest share to say so in CNN polling back to 2000.

In both cases, the declines come chiefly among Republicans. Last May, 50% of Republicans considered North Korea a very serious threat, now just 30% say the same. There have been smaller declines over the same time among independents (down 13 points) and Democrats (down 6 points). Likewise, the share calling Iran a very serious threat has fallen 23 points among Republicans, 3 points among independents and 13 among Democrats.

The share of Republicans who consider Russia a very serious threat has also dipped in the last year, from 28% in 2018 to 20% now. Among independents, it's dipped 5 points, and nearly half of Democrats consider Russia a deeply serious threat (48%), about the same as the 46% who said so last year.

The CNN Poll was conducted by SSRS May 28 through 31 among a random national sample of 1,006 adults reached on landlines or cellphones by a live interviewer. Results for the full sample have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.8 percentage points. It is larger for subgroups.
 
The article said:
his approval rating on foreign trade has grown 9 points over that time among a core constituency: Whites who do not have college degrees.

Whaddaya know, people who are most directly affected by foreign trade like it when you have a solid foreign-trade policy that doesn't put them out of work.
 
It's stunning to hear CNN actually admit this.

At some point they've gotta start prepping the electorate for the most likely outcome. If they start making some minor admissions to the likelihood of defeat now, they can mitigate some of the sting of the fact that all of their reeeesisting did absolutely nothing.
 
Our objective was not met by the Treaty of Ghent. Also, they burned our capital, not we theirs.
They burned a ~20 year old housing development in a shitty swamp. Did they actually do anything to anything actually relevant? I seem to recall that we burned Toronto down. Something that was actually an important city for more than occasionally hosting legislature.
 
At some point they've gotta start prepping the electorate for the most likely outcome. If they start making some minor admissions to the likelihood of defeat now, they can mitigate some of the sting of the fact that all of their reeeesisting did absolutely nothing.
Sure, I just didn't expect it to start so early. I expected the media to go in gung-ho "<bidenbernieharrisbooker> is going to win for sure!" up until about October 2020 when the low-profile op-eds advising "guarded optimism" would start appearing and eventually leading to "polls are neck and neck, get out there and vote for our, I mean the blue, I mean 'your preferred' candidate Tuesday!" articles emerging from MSM sources about a week prior to the vote.

It's just weird for them to be starting it this early. It's almost as if they're trying to slowly boil off all the pent-up rage they've been brewing in the NPCs for 2.5 years because they know if they don't do something, that rage will explode right in their faces come election night 2020.
 
At some point they've gotta start prepping the electorate for the most likely outcome. If they start making some minor admissions to the likelihood of defeat now, they can mitigate some of the sting of the fact that all of their reeeesisting did absolutely nothing.
In other words they are slowly walking back their hysteria/entering the acceptance stage just like many here predicted they would.
 
At some point they've gotta start prepping the electorate for the most likely outcome. If they start making some minor admissions to the likelihood of defeat now, they can mitigate some of the sting of the fact that all of their reeeesisting did absolutely nothing.

My pessimistic side says that they're gently walking it back a bit for now, hoping that by the time the Dems anoint their Chosen One, people will have forgotten the insanity. Then they'll go in full-force again with ORANGE MAN BAD HITLER FASCIST FUNDIE BIGOTS.

IOW, sometimes your enemy stops shooting because he's reloading.
 
Lol, she talks about the Battle of the Bulge but likely doesn't know what it is.

Unless she means she's trying very hard to overcome her metaphorical massive boner for Trump by pretending she hates him, like Standard Romcom Plot #2.

I get the feeling her Battle of the Bulge happens in front of the mirror every morning..... and the results from the front are never very good.
 
They can't do that yet. At the moment they believe that Biden is their best shot, so they're trying to shill the "he's just like Obama we all want the Obama days back right guys" narrative.

The won't back down until they realise it's over, and they're so out of touch it will be after the election.
But who wouldn't want the Obama Days back?
After all I'm told that Obama was the most perfect President ever and only racist Flyover Conservative plebs clinging to their guns and bibles disagreed.
Oh and as an aside how fitting that we are now on the 2016th page.
 
787013


Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) conceded that she is so consumed by President Donald Trump that she observes “Trumpless Sundays” to “restore” both her soul and sanity.

“Just so I can restore my soul and my sanity, I have Trumpless Sundays, so on Sundays, I don’t watch any news,” Hirono told Yahoo News in an interview released Wednesday.

“I have been promoting Trumpless Sunday to a lot of people, who think it’s a great idea.” Hirono continued, proudly. “[Y]ou do that on a Sunday you don’t have to feel guilty at all.”
 
How the hell has no one tried to assassinate him yet? People are going insane about the Orange man more than any other president but no one's actually done anything.

Some have tried but been routed by secret service.

But Trump is protected by the same sort of fear logic that protected Obama. Killing him would turn him into a martyr and worse, pretty much give the GOP a blank check to turn the country into a one party system with the Democrats pretty much banned and worse, given that Trump's replacement is Pence; a man who you REALLY don't want wielding the blank check of power he'd receive if someone killed Trump.

Also, it looks like Youtube has partially caved to Carlos Maza's smear campaign and completely demonetized Crowder's entire Youtube Channel. And Gizmodo has their hit piece up.

Wonder how long until Maza is up on MSNBC's late night line-up spewing his smear campaign, given that you just know it's pissing them off that Youtube didn't eliminate the last major conservative internet guy left online prior to them moving to stage two of operation "stealing 2020".
 
Back