Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

[ChurchOfGodBear]

1] @flossman , see nothing about Ulrik in that post, & don't recall them at all nor me mentioning them before.

2] @Mr. X , of course, my terrible writing is not the reader's fault, nor mine, as something cannot be anyone's fault if it doesn't exist. As for your claim, @ChurchOfGodBear , I have no such mentality, but your mentality (or lack thereof, or mental issues, etc.) can be easily named as the cause for your incorrectly believing that I had that. (Since I don't, there is no need to discuss the existence or lack thereof of what you claim to be a reflection of it.)

Yeah, your writing is bad. And your response to us pointing that out is more bad writing. At least you're predictable.

 

[Cowlick]

Yeah, your writing is bad. And your response to us pointing that out is more bad writing. At least you're predictable.

My writing at its worst is as good as the best of most here. I admit I am predictable here: I will always be smarter than you, & often prove to have higher character. Meanwhile, I am often surprised by if posts to/about me will be false, off-topic, failed attempts at humor, or some mix of these.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

My writing at its worst is as good as the best of most here. I admit I am predictable here: I will always be smarter than you, & often prove to have higher character. Meanwhile, I am often surprised by if posts to/about me will be false, off-topic, failed attempts at humor, or some mix of these.

I will posit that you are not a good judge of the quality of your own writing. If you were, it wouldn't be so bad.

 

[Trombonista]

My writing at its worst is as good as the best of most here. I admit I am predictable here: I will always be smarter than you, & often prove to have higher character. Meanwhile, I am often surprised by if posts to/about me will be false, off-topic, failed attempts at humor, or some mix of these.

If you're so smart, how come you still haven't taken this thread down?

 

[Mr. X]

I will posit that you are not a good judge of the quality of your own writing. If you were, it wouldn't be so bad.

He's also a poor judge of his own intellect.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

He's also a poor judge of his own intellect.

True. I did neglect to mention that.

 

[ON 190]

1] @flossman , see nothing about Ulrik in that post, & don't recall them at all nor me mentioning them before.

Well, you’ve treated him like a slave in the past.

 

[Syaoran Li]

My writing at its worst is as good as the best of most here. I admit I am predictable here: I will always be smarter than you, & often prove to have higher character. Meanwhile, I am often surprised by if posts to/about me will be false, off-topic, failed attempts at humor, or some mix of these.

I know I have said this before but allow me to reiterate...

You talk like a fag and your shit's all retarded

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

Meanwhile, I am often surprised by if posts to/about me will be false, off-topic, failed attempts at humor, or some mix of these.

What failed abortion of American English grammar is this?

 

[Doctor Stan]

What failed abortion of American English grammar is this?

P normal for TJ, the way he writes his posts makes me feel like I'm having a stroke sometimes

 

[Cowlick]

1] @ChurchOfGodBear , my response to you claiming that my writing is bad is admittedly more bad writing, as a bunch of my writing proves it is not bad, so after you have claimed it is, I decided to work backward, & prove to you that unlike many members here, I can do either.

2] Also, I am a good judge of the quality of my own writing. It is likely the #1 reason it appears to you that I am not is that none of you are good judges of the quality of any writing, largely due to the fact that none of the writing you do has much if any.

3] @Mr. X, I am not a poor judge of my own intellect, & it is likely the #1 reason you feel I am is because you lack much intellect &/or lack when it comes to the ability to judge how good or bad a person is at judging something you have never possessed the ability to judge yourself.

4] @flossman , I have never treated anyone like a slave, nor have I treated anyone here any worse than anyone here had treated me.

5] @Syaoran Li, I may or may not have written this before, but I word things "like a fag" (to use your terminology) in the hopes those here might be more likely to understand what I mean. Also, nobody's s^^t is exceptional, as that is a self-contradictory statement.

6] @NobleGreyHorse, none of those things, which may be the best explanation why you described it as being all of them at once.

 

[Syaoran Li]

3] @Mr. X, I am not a poor judge of my own intellect, & it is likely the #1 reason you feel I am is because you lack much intellect &/or lack when it comes to the ability to judge how good or bad a person is at judging something you have never possessed the ability to judge yourself.

I know I also said this to you before, but it bears repeating....


Actual intellectuals don't endlessly brag about how intelligent they are

 

[Mr. X]

blah blah blah

Your insults are unintentionally hilarious since you have no idea how to write a good one.

 

[ON 190]

Your insults are unintentionally hilarious since you have no idea how to write a good one.

He also keeps pretending not to know who Ulrik is. Probably out of shame.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

1] @ChurchOfGodBear , my response to you claiming that my writing is bad is admittedly more bad writing, as a bunch of my writing proves it is not bad, so after you have claimed it is, I decided to work backward, & prove to you that unlike many members here, I can do either.

2] Also, I am a good judge of the quality of my own writing. It is likely the #1 reason it appears to you that I am not is that none of you are good judges of the quality of any writing, largely due to the fact that none of the writing you do has much if any.

3] @Mr. X, I am not a poor judge of my own intellect, & it is likely the #1 reason you feel I am is because you lack much intellect &/or lack when it comes to the ability to judge how good or bad a person is at judging something you have never possessed the ability to judge yourself.

4] @flossman , I have never treated anyone like a slave, nor have I treated anyone here any worse than anyone here had treated me.

5] @Syaoran Li, I may or may not have written this before, but I word things "like a fag" (to use your terminology) in the hopes those here might be more likely to understand what I mean. Also, nobody's s^^t is exceptional, as that is a self-contradictory statement.

6] @NobleGreyHorse, none of those things, which may be the best explanation why you described it as being all of them at once.

M'Homeboy, I think we should subject your writing to the analysis of an impartial third party. What say you?

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

6] @NobleGreyHorse, none of those things, which may be the best explanation why you described it as being all of them at once.

What things "at once"? If I'd meant for "failed" and "abortion" to be separate ideas, I would have put in a comma. "Failed abortion" is a reasonably common expression in English, meaning "Damn, that sentence/person/thing that I am describing is ugly."

Or are you finally admitting that what you wrote is not American English grammar?

 

[LoverofPi]

What things "at once"? If I'd meant for "failed" and "abortion" to be separate ideas, I would have put in a comma. "Failed abortion" is a reasonably common expression in English, meaning "Damn, that sentence/person/thing that I am describing is ugly."

Or are you finally admitting that what you wrote is not American English grammar?

He is, though he doesn't realize it.

Teej, allow me to explain, since I know you're not getting this. NobleGreyHorse called your prose a "failed abortion of American English grammar." Noble has already explained how you failed to comprehend the idiom of "failed abortion" but I would like to explain that by responding that your pose is "none of those things" you are asserting it is neither a failed abortion nor is it an example of english grammar. And this statement technically holds true, if it's not an example of english grammar, it cannot be a failed abortion of one. It's still a metaphorical failed abortion of course, but of some other language, spoken only by the wateriest heads and the foulest of teeth.

 

[ON 190]

Noble has already explained how you failed to comprehend the idiom

This is one of @Cowlick's biggest failings as a writer; he simply does not get most idioms. He responded to someone saying "there's an elephant in the room" with "and there's no elephant in the room because it's said elephants never forget," which you'll see pop up on the top of the site sometimes. His stubborn and rigid mindset make him unable to parse colloquialisms or idioms. It's hilarious.

 

[Doctor Stan]

Also, I am a good judge of the quality of my own writing. It is likely the #1 reason it appears to you that I am not is that none of you are good judges of the quality of any writing, largely due to the

Are you familiar with the dunning kruger effect?

 

[Munchie_Minder]

I came to this thread to find out who TJchurch is. I go to the original pages and read through the first 20, written in 2014. I quickly get bored and skip to the last few pages written just in the previous few days, only to find that the exact same shit is being discussed 4 years later. I guess you didn’t get the thread removed, huh?