- Joined
- Jun 11, 2019
I'm skeptical of this claim about that old image of Vic being Photoshopped. I'm just not seeing it.
There's a strategy I use for visual art where I take an image and then equalize each channel in varying colorspaces to generate neat false-color versions of a photo. One of the strengths of this strategy is that it occasionally makes inconsistencies very plain. This analysis is not showing anything atypical in the image. I don't find the error-level analyses very persuasive here.
I've attached a few different colorspaces to show the kind of details this equalization technique pulls out of the image. Left to right, these colorspaces are xyY, HSI, RGB, YUV.
View attachment 794985View attachment 794992View attachment 794993View attachment 794994
Stopped being a lurker faggot to point out that you’re all trying to forensics a picture of a printed picture, when all you had to do was realize that while we’re under the impression Vic has a third leg, it doesn’t drop down to his calves.
Doing this to a picture of a printed picture is almost as illogical as the blue whale taking a screen cap of a screen cap and being so surprised that fotoforensics shows it’s a screenshot that you think BHBH logo is photoshopped to his wall.