Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

[Coldgrip]

I do understand the difference. But neither of us can even agree on what a scumbag is. I mean, we could use the same definition but we obviously see it differently. So, again, what is the point?

Actually, everybody here agrees you're a scumbag. And a rapist. And a pussy.

I'd recommend some articles that describe my life and what brought me to this but it is a waste of time with a moron like you. I mean, if you wanna know what led me to this by asking these idiotic questions you're already a moron, not to mention everything else.

How is your mom faggot?

And don't worry, I won't kill myself just yet. That would make it easy. First I will give the world what it adores.

You going to record it? Please, please, please let there be a musical number in it before you off yourself.

 

[Taily Puff]

EVERYONE NEEDS TO STOP LIKING THINGS THAT I DON'T LIKE!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Cubanodun]

They should be decided by that but not prearranged. A society in women are attracted to those things and disgusted by seducers is enough. Arranged marriages existed in the past but weren't always the norm. What was a norm in every sane society was women were attracted to things you mention as they saw it like they see seduction, scumbaggery, rape, stupidity, backstabbing, burping, hitting people, maiming women etc today - attractive features. And since arranged marriages usually had some economic or political (often both) goal when they happened women weren't unhappy or felt forced. they were just arranged into something they'd likely pick anyway.

since when scumbaggery, rape, stupidity, backstabbing, burping, hitting people and maimin womens are attractive? where it says its attractive? only in your head

also the manga, did you like it?

 

[Saney]

@Holden is Fschmidt coming back to chat, or did he chicken out because we wouldn't cave in to his demands?

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

taily - again, you're being stupid and dishonest. neither of us can prove that what our version of a scumbag is correct the way we can prove 2 and 2 makes 4. when i provided evidence, like UN illegitimacy rates or studies on IQ declining, you ignored it or said it doesn't prove anything.

so, go ahead, scumbag. show me your citation that seducers are good.

 

[TM Ambrose]

@Holden confirmed to be from planet Nestor

 

[Cubanodun]

taily - again, you're being stupid and dishonest. neither of us can prove that what our version of a scumbag is correct the way we can prove 2 and 2 makes 4. when i provided evidence, like UN illegitimacy rates or studies on IQ declining, you ignored it or said it doesn't prove anything.

so, go ahead, scumbag. show me your citation that seducers are good.

also what is your stupidity with seduction?, you dont need that to get a women, if only you stopped hating everything even you could get laid

 

[TM Ambrose]

Hey @Holden, When are you going to disprove that the third google result for you isn't an ED page that says you wanted to fuck your mom? I'm waiting.

 

[Handsome Pete]

What was a norm in every sane society was women were attracted to things you mention as they saw it like they see seduction, scumbaggery, rape, stupidity, backstabbing, burping, hitting people, maiming women etc today - attractive features.

Again with the burping? What happened to you, man? Who burped in your face, and why was it such a major turning point in your life?

 

[4Macie]

@Cosmos
I like your avatar... just thought you should know.
@Cubanodun
I like your avatar too!
@Taily Puff
And your avatar is love!
@sikotik
Yopyopyopyopyopyopyopyop (for those that don't know what this means. I used seduction in its native language)
@HipstrsGonnaHip
Peekaboo I see you!
@JPetro
HI! You sexy beast! :3
@Saney
10/10 would make babies with you.
@trombonista
I love your spinning avatar. I get distracted whenever I see a post by you.

@Everyone Else. I love you. But not Holden. Holden can go suck a cactus up his butt.

This concludes the "Macie's A Slut Show"
Edit: If I didn't say your name, I'm sorry. I just looked at whomever was in my "alert" bar at the time and whomever was in this thread. I still love you though. <3 <3 <3
Oh god @PurpleMonkeyDishwasher I forgot about you. Much Love. You keep on washing those dishes you brave soul!

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

they saw it like they see seduction, scumbaggery, rape, stupidity, backstabbing, burping, hitting people, maiming women etc today - attractive features.

More proof that @Holden has never talked to a woman in his life.

 

[TM Ambrose]

so, go ahead, scumbag. show me your citation that seducers are good.

It's not a black and white issue @Holden. We're not saying Seducers are good, but we're not saying they're bad either. We stay neutral on that, which means you have the burden of proof. Evidence please.

 

[Cubanodun]

@Cosmos
I like your avatar... just thought you should know.
@Cubanodun
I like your avatar too!
@Taily Puff
And your avatar is love!
@sikotik
Yopyopyopyopyopyopyopyop (for those that don't know what this means. I used seduction in its native language)
@HipstrsGonnaHip
Peekaboo I see you!
@JPetro
HI! You sexy beast! :3
@Saney
10/10 would make babies with you.

@Everyone Else. I love you. But not Holden. Holden can go suck a cactus up his butt.

This concludes the "Macie's A Slut Show"

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

i provided evidence, like UN illegitimacy rates or studies on IQ declining, you ignored it or said it doesn't prove anything.

No, we said that those thing didn't say what you think they say. You've shown repeatedly that you have no idea how to read that data. All you know is how @fschmidt twists the data, which you then parrot to us.

 

[Cephalometrist]

@Holden So how does it feel being denied by Papa Bear @fschmidt himself after he finally made his debut on this forum? How long did it take you to convince him to come here and fight your battles for you? You were awfully quiet when fschmidt was still actively posting here, you know? You probably hoped for a better outcome.
But what interests me is this: fschmidt is basically on the same level now as your parents and their coworkers always have been, isn't he?
He has the "resources" to fulfill your needs and yet he denies you access to them (nobody here bought his "I don't know him that well" bullshit, you posted on his webpage for a very long time now and he said in one of his first posts that he agrees with your political and social views to a very high degree). So, he pretty much is a rape ape/slut enabler, isn't he? Abandoning poor incels to fight on their own in this harsh, harsh world...

 

[Cubanodun]

@Holden So how does it feel being denied by Papa Bear @fschmidt himself after he finally made his debut on this forum? How long did it take you to convince him to come here and fight your battles for you? You were awfully quiet when fschmidt was still actively posting here, you know? You probably hoped for a better outcome.
But what interests me is this: fschmidt is basically on the same level now as your parents and their coworkers always have been, isn't he?
He has the "resources" to fulfill your needs and yet he denies you access to them (nobody here bought his "I don't know him that well" bullshit, you posted on his webpage for a very long time now and he said in one of his first posts that he agrees with your political and social views to a very high degree). So, he pretty much is a rape ape/slut enabler, isn't he? Abandoning poor incels to fight on their own in this harsh, harsh world...

he is as alone as a nun in a heavy metal concert

 

[Cuck Norris]

No, we said that those thing didn't say what you think they say. You've shown repeatedly that you have no idea how to read that data. All you know is how @fwschmidt twists the data, which you then parrot to us.

@fschmidt only reads the titles and maybe the hypothesis. He doesn't bother with TL; DR bullshit like test criteria, data, or results.

 

[Taily Puff]

taily - again, you're being stupid and dishonest. neither of us can prove that what our version of a scumbag is correct the way we can prove 2 and 2 makes 4. when i provided evidence, like UN illegitimacy rates or studies on IQ declining, you ignored it or said it doesn't prove anything.

so, go ahead, scumbag. show me your citation that seducers are good.

Well you're being a meanie butt fartface. That's how most high level intellectual discourse starts, right?

Your studies have no direct correlation to your claims, and your personal bias would get you laughed out of any serious discussion (and rightly so). You use the term scumbag as a variable in an equation intended to prove your point, but readily admit that the term scumbag can be proven. You're intellectually dishonest. You actually lie by by being so dumb you make being honest more difficult. You're just cunning enough to pick big words while you ramble on, but you could be replaced by a speak n spell with a higher syllable count.

"Seducers" in your statement is absolutely meaningless. I could pay to put that down the side of the empire state building and it still wouldn't have enough emphasis. You picked words that made you have feelings and then tried to apply logic to them. You were the opposite of correct before you even started, and then you somehow became more incorrect than the opposite of correct.

 

[TM Ambrose]

taily - again, you're being stupid and dishonest. neither of us can prove that what our version of a scumbag is correct the way we can prove 2 and 2 makes 4. when i provided evidence, like UN illegitimacy rates or studies on IQ declining, you ignored it or said it doesn't prove anything.

Somebody is showing how low their IQ is.

 

[Cubanodun]

Well you're being a meanie butt fartface. That's how most high level intellectual discourse starts, right?

Your studies have no direct correlation to your claims, and your personal bias would get you laughed out of any serious discussion (and rightly so). You use the term scumbag as a variable in an equation intended to prove your point, but readily admit that the term scumbag can be proven. You're intellectually dishonest. You actually lie by by being so dumb you make being honest more difficult. You're just cunning enough to pick big words while you ramble on, but you could be replaced by a speak n spell with a higher syllable count.

"Seducers" in your statement is absolutely meaningless. I could pay to put that down the side of the empire state building and it still wouldn't have enough emphasis. You picked words that made you have feelings and then tried to apply logic to them. You were the opposite of correct before you even started, and then you somehow became more incorrect than the opposite of incorrect.

dont forget when he admited that womens who liked to be treated like trash hates him and that scumbag/thugs are insane... only to say later that he want to be one