"Ma'am there's been a bit of a complication during your son's surgery. If you could come this way..."
It is actually the STDs (although whatever drugs trannies put in their system won't be exactly healthful).
Travel to some tropical countries automatically nets you a decade ban on donating blood, even if it's just stepping outside the airport to make a phone call. Doesn't matter what you did while there, you were there. Are they being that-country-phobic?
Zoe Cunt is a grade-AAA sociopath; most troons aren't far behind.
I presume it is an antibody thing rather than a hormone thing?
They don't test each bag; that would take too much time and money. Instead, they test it in batches. If one bag of blood was HIV-positive, the whole batch is contaminated.
debunkingdenialism.com
www.newswire.ca
I can't donate in US anymore because of possible mad cow exposure.
Here’s something horrifying for you.
The HIV stats: in the UK, TW are treated just like normal women for blood donation purposes, NOT as a high risk population.
The FDA does the same:
“Defer for 12 months from the most recent contact a man who has had sex with another man during the past 12 months.
Defer for 12 months from the most recent contact a female who has had sex during the past 12 months with a man who has had sex with another man in the past 12 months.
How do the recommendations apply to transgender individuals?
The FDA’s recommendation to blood establishments is that in the context of the donor history questionnaire, male or female gender should be self-identified and self-reported for the purpose of blood donation.”
Questions about Blood > Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk…
archived 27 Dec 2015 16:47:06 UTCarchive.li
So: a man who has sex with another man must be deferred for a year from last contact. But if that man self identifies as a woman, he is now treated as a Woman who has had sex with a man, who is now in a much lower risk category.
Peoples health is being put at risk by this.
I wonder if the first person given HIV this way will be able to sue?
There was a great article explaining blood donation rules here
Lisa Magnusson Falsely Claims Blood Donation Rules Are "Pure Moralism" | Debunking Denialism
Bad science journalism is a considerable threat to the integrity and process of the public understanding of science. Far too
Basically, if you happen to be part of a group considered to be high risk (for various reasons, like contact to a disease like AIDS, malaria, mad cow) you can't donate. If you lived in England for over 6 months during the 80s you can't donate.
Because they don't test individually, mostly because of costs (monetary, but also you must not make patients any more sick) but also because of statistics - odds are too great, better just dismiss.
Italy I believe have a personal checkup done to the candidates, however. So they chose to operate on a case by case basis.
One name: Kyle Freeman. He lied to donate blood. A great case to read about.
Canadian Blood Services' CEO Gives Initial Reaction to Ontario Superior Court<br />MSM Ruling
OTTAWA, Sept. 9 /CNW/ - Canadian Blood Services welcomes the Ontario Superior Court ruling in the Charter challenge involving Kyle Freeman. The ruling by...
Gay blood donor Kyle Freeman remains defiant | Xtra Magazine
After seven years of delays, the trial against a Toronto gay man who dodged questions on a Canadian Blood Services questionnaire in order to give blood began thwww.dailyxtra.com
The slope seems to have not just gotten more slippery, but also more steep.
Here ya go:
Here ya go:
0.34% of Americans have HIV (including people who are not yet aware they have HIV).
An estimated 14% of transwomen have HIV. The metaanalysis referenced by the CDC also investigated race, estimating that 44% of black transwomen have HIV.
Now let's compare with men who have sex with men, another population deemed to be risky blood donors. Here's my rough calculation; if anyone has data to make a better one, please do:
My calculation comports with the CDC estimate that 56% of people with HIV are gay and bisexual men. They are overrepresented in the HIV-positive population but not overwhelmingly. Articles like this one claiming that 20% of gay men have HIV are misleading: they're looking at sexually active gay men in the cities with highest rate of infection, NOT the entire population of gay/bi men in the country.
- 3.9% of men identify as "LGBT." Troons being lumped in there muddies the data.
- There are 151,800,000 men in the United States (pdf warning)
- Therefore, there are 5,920,200 "LGBT-identifying" men in the US.
- 632,300 gay and bisexual men have HIV
- ~0.42% of gay and bisexual men have HIV
Positron said:
If people think that risking innocent people of HIV, ruining the future sex lives of children, makes a joke of the medical establishment, and robbing women of opportunities to excel, etc, do not justify hatred, I honestly don't know what to tell them.
