Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Super Smelly Vagina said:
Monica and Ron both went to pieces because of people tweeting at them. What's going to happen when they are being asked the same line of questioning in a confrontational manner without the luxury of ignoring, blocking or deflecting? Maybe BHBH will allow them to bring a teddy bear for emotional support.
Click to expand...
Monico seems like a teeth grinder, i'm guessing she'll gnaw her jaw right off. Toy will just piss himself.
 
HTTP Error 404 said:
So uh, I guess Ty didn't give them the courtesy of just letting them be a little bit late, eh?
Click to expand...

The problem isn't that they're late but that they refused to turn it over at all, turned over a bunch of defamatory public tweets instead, and held the rest of the discovery that they were obligated to produce hostage demanding a Rule 11 agreement.

All the objections are patently frivolous and in violation of the rules. Also, you're supposed to object in a timely fashion, not a day after discovery was due.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Maraschino, AStupidMonkey, Marvin and 10 others
So MoRon's response to the interrogatory demanding their supposed proof is...

808491


quickthrowaway said:
View attachment 808468

"Google it."

Fucking hell.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Late
  • Autistic
Reactions: Wake me up, NotaLolyer, Bootylicious Bootyhole and 7 others
AnOminous said:
The problem isn't that they're late but that they refused to turn it over at all, turned over a bunch of defamatory public tweets instead, and held the rest of the discovery that they were obligated to produce hostage demanding a Rule 11 agreement.

All the objections are patently frivolous and in violation of the rules. Also, you're supposed to object in a timely fashion, not a day after discovery was due.
Click to expand...
NIck pointed something out: that Casey isnt technically objecting. How far is argument likely to go.
 
DragoonSierra said:
NIck pointed something out: that Casey isnt technically objecting. How far is argument likely to go.
Click to expand...

If he's not objecting then he's just flat out refusing to comply with discovery. I don't think the court will make such nice distinctions when the reality of it is he hasn't turned over discovery material and is interposing ridiculous and patently frivolous excuses for it.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: AStupidMonkey, Make Anime Illegal, Bootylicious Bootyhole and 11 others
Another question.

About the libel proof claim. Couldnt any evidence that would be used to counter that claim, like rooms full of attendees at cons, contribute to the claim that hes a public figure or a limited public figure?
 
DragoonSierra said:
Another question.

About the libel proof claim. Couldnt any evidence that would be used to counter that claim, like rooms full of attendees at cons, contribute to the claim that hes a public figure or a limited public figure?
Click to expand...
No, it wouldn't contribute to that. It doesn't really have anything to do with popularity or support. Else every popular person would be one as long as they are popular in a certain group. There's a lot more to it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Yuusha-sama, Evil Bunny and teriyakiburns
DragoonSierra said:
Another question.

About the libel proof claim. Couldnt any evidence that would be used to counter that claim, like rooms full of attendees at cons, contribute to the claim that hes a public figure or a limited public figure?
Click to expand...

Maybe, but that defense is a no-go anyway. Where that evidence harms Vic is that it tends to reduce the amount of damages because the defendants can point to it and say look, he's still doing okay even with the defamation. Ironically, that would force them to argue that Vic is really popular and well liked, more than they are.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Evil Bunny
New Docs. @AnOminous care to explain what this is about ? If it is about interrogatories i am not sure why the hearing is set for July 18th which is after the depositions.

Edit - Kiwis who are generally uploading the docs pick up your slack....the doc has been on twitter for 6 hours or so now. Also shouldn't there be one more doc that is requesting for said hearing before the hearing being schedules ? If there is someone should look into it if its up.
 

Attachments

  • Informative
Reactions: AStupidMonkey, Coach Kreeton Of All That, knux and 3 others
beardium said:
New Docs. @AnOminous care to explain what this is about ? If it is about interrogatories i am not sure why the hearing is set for July 18th which is after the depositions.

Edit - Kiwis who are generally uploading the docs pick up your slack....the doc has been on twitter for 6 hours or so now. Also shouldn't there be one more doc that is requesting for said hearing before the hearing being schedules ? If there is someone should look into it if its up.
Click to expand...
Interesting. Any documents for the May 31st transcripts or the initial discovery letters from MoRon?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
some_crazy said:
I'm pretty sure Nick got those from Ty (though I could be wrong).
Click to expand...
The answers to interrogatories pretty much HAVE to have come from one of the parties, I don't think they are filed yet, they likely will be filed with the motions to compel and sanctions when/if they come.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back