Zoosadist Zoosadism Megathread - Joshua "Kero the Wolf" Hoffman & Friends.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

If you really had to who would you sex?

  • Total voters
    4,015
Lurk said:
Today I learned that animal fuckers are a protected group :story: The audacity of these subhuman degenerates to claim they fall under that umbrella, jesus christ. The fact that Twitter apparently is upholding it and removing posts that rightly denounce this harmful shit is the most disturbing thing, just what in the everloving fuck is the reasoning behind that?!
Click to expand...
I had to check that this was for real because people legit believe that Twitter recognises and condones zoophilia.
At least people shown their rejection in the #nozoophilia hashtag. Still autistic for not detecting the sarcasm.

Enjoy the Tism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius and Clockwork_PurBle
did anyone ever figure out the dox of the marshallfox22 guy? I've been lurking this thread and reported him to the Canadian Crimestoppers, but they said they can't do anything without knowing where the guy is. I tried to give them Memeology's info, but not sure if they contacted him. @Memology 101
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clockwork_PurBle and Cat Phuckers
zoophiles are stealing art now.
803149


original artist.
 
  • Autistic
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: n33gr, s0mbra, Kamov Ka-52 and 3 others
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: n33gr, s0mbra, Kot Johansson and 5 others
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Hanamura, Clockwork_PurBle and IAmNotAlpharius
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: ScrapBuyer, n33gr, Hanamura and 2 others
Connectingdotsanddogs said:
Preteen

Paraphilia professor

Pick one
Click to expand...

part of the grooming process for kids is teaching them adult language so they feel smart and more mature than their peers- it isolates them from existing support and encourages comfort around adults. any 13 year old who knows what paraphilia means is the victim of grooming if not outright sexual abuse.
 
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Umaru Doma, Parthenos, ScrapBuyer and 12 others
807557


What "scientists researching zoophillia" were you fucking talking to? Animal psychologists? Human psychologists? Biologists? Anybody who didn't have a vested interest in researching animal fucking in order to argue for animal fucking? Why the secrecy? Surely their incredible findings must be ground-breaking and worthy of personal credit, if they even existed. Source?

The fact they single out mammals too could be lulzy though; inb4 zoophiles have an internal schism that fucking dogs is okay because "mammals can consent" but reptile-and-bird fuckers are kicked to the curb. I could easily see it being like the split that no-MAPs and pedophiles currently have, where no-MAPs try to have the high ground by not being around kids despite still fantasizing about fucking kids.

It's just so nauseating that zoophiles conflate "is able to have sex and/or understand what sex is" to "is capable of giving informed consent, well aware of all the possible repercussions of such an action". Pregnancy aside, animals don't know or understand jack shit about STDs/STIs which at least some of these fucking zoophiles probably have by now after having unprotected sex with a goddamn menagerie.

The fact so many of these zoophiles aren't "monogamous" with their animals either tells you really all you need to know. They'll talk hot shit about how their dog is their partner in life or their soul mate or whatever but as soon as they get bored or it dies they'll get another one. Tastypaws says it best in the post above; he waited four months before fucking his dog! Truly a gentleman.

I'll take my "mad on the internet" rating.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: n33gr, IAmNotAlpharius, s0mbra and 9 others
Pukebucket said:
View attachment 807557

What "scientists researching zoophillia" were you fucking talking to? Animal psychologists? Human psychologists? Biologists? Anybody who didn't have a vested interest in researching animal fucking in order to argue for animal fucking? Why the secrecy? Surely their incredible findings must be ground-breaking and worthy of personal credit, if they even existed. Source?

The fact they single out mammals too could be lulzy though; inb4 zoophiles have an internal schism that fucking dogs is okay because "mammals can consent" but reptile-and-bird fuckers are kicked to the curb. I could easily see it being like the split that no-MAPs and pedophiles currently have, where no-MAPs try to have the high ground by not being around kids despite still fantasizing about fucking kids.

It's just so nauseating that zoophiles conflate "is able to have sex and/or understand what sex is" to "is capable of giving informed consent, well aware of all the possible repercussions of such an action". Pregnancy aside, animals don't know or understand jack shit about STDs/STIs which at least some of these fucking zoophiles probably have by now after having unprotected sex with a goddamn menagerie.

The fact so many of these zoophiles aren't "monogamous" with their animals either tells you really all you need to know. They'll talk hot shit about how their dog is their partner in life or their soul mate or whatever but as soon as they get bored or it dies they'll get another one. Tastypaws says it best in the post above; he waited four months before fucking his dog! Truly a gentleman.

I'll take my "mad on the internet" rating.
Click to expand...
I'm reposting this from another thread but it still applies:
Furries_Dog_Fucker_Consent.png
 
  • Horrifying
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Fireskull, _Blackbird_, Gaius Cumulus and 28 others
Oh shit I remember that artist! He posted a photo of one of his dogs and got flooded with people talking about how sexy his dog is. Caused him to delete every single photograph he had of his dogs on FA.

He was pretty pissed. This was god....at least six or so years ago?
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: biledriver, NarutoYaoi, n33gr and 8 others
Pukebucket said:
View attachment 807557

What "scientists researching zoophillia" were you fucking talking to? Animal psychologists? Human psychologists? Biologists? Anybody who didn't have a vested interest in researching animal fucking in order to argue for animal fucking? Why the secrecy? Surely their incredible findings must be ground-breaking and worthy of personal credit, if they even existed. Source?

The fact they single out mammals too could be lulzy though; inb4 zoophiles have an internal schism that fucking dogs is okay because "mammals can consent" but reptile-and-bird fuckers are kicked to the curb. I could easily see it being like the split that no-MAPs and pedophiles currently have, where no-MAPs try to have the high ground by not being around kids despite still fantasizing about fucking kids.

It's just so nauseating that zoophiles conflate "is able to have sex and/or understand what sex is" to "is capable of giving informed consent, well aware of all the possible repercussions of such an action". Pregnancy aside, animals don't know or understand jack shit about STDs/STIs which at least some of these fucking zoophiles probably have by now after having unprotected sex with a goddamn menagerie.

The fact so many of these zoophiles aren't "monogamous" with their animals either tells you really all you need to know. They'll talk hot shit about how their dog is their partner in life or their soul mate or whatever but as soon as they get bored or it dies they'll get another one. Tastypaws says it best in the post above; he waited four months before fucking his dog! Truly a gentleman.

I'll take my "mad on the internet" rating.
Click to expand...

Here is one of em. She is a sex therapist though. Bet she had a donkey up her cooch at one point.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
Reactions: Clockwork_PurBle, Kamov Ka-52, Carnavoyeur and 3 others
 
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius, The Great Chandler, s0mbra and 7 others
*sighs and puts on biology hat*

I love how they keep trying to bring up two human adults that can clearly inform each other of consent and having sex is somehow the same thing as raping a dog because it wagged its tail at you.

Body language among animals is complex and sometimes hard to understand. For example, wolves have lots of subtle, almost invisible gestures that they use to communicate with each other. Horses can have an entire conversation just by ear and tail flicks. It's easy to misinterpret a behavior in an animal and more often than not, a person will project intent on said behavior and interpret it as such.

A thing dogfuckers cite a lot is that 'a dog humped me, that's consent!'

Just because a dog humps a person doesn't mean they want to fuck them. Like everything else it's a specific form of body language with many meanings depending on context. What could it mean?

> I'm humping because something hurts (UTI, skin rash) and i'm trying to soothe it.
> I'm so excited or so stressed that I'm going to burn off energy through the act of humping.
> I'm actually just playing with you because us dogs will play hump each other if the other tolerates it.
> I'm humping because I learned it from other dogs and was never corrected. I don't know what I'm doing but I saw other dogs doing it!
> My hormones are going nuts and I have no idea what I'm doing, but this makes me feel better.

Note these behaviors apply to both sexes of dogs. In no way are they actively looking to fuck a human. Mounting a human to have sex is a trained behavior and not one a natural dog would do. So these idiot dog fuckers could get their leg humped by a dog that is actually hurting from a UTI and trying to soothe it, and think "Oh hey this dog wants to fuck me!"

Most often than not, people WANT to see 'consent' so damn badly to fit their own narrative. So to them, it's easy to pick out 'consenting' behavior because they WANT it to be. A cow that flicks her tail could just have an itch. The stallion could just be feeling hot. The dog could have a medical issue. But them? "OH BOY THEY WANT ME TO FUCK EM."

So yeah, zoophiles are idiots.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Hamberlard Raid, Fireskull, The Fair Lady and 33 others
I wonder how many of these sick fucks are oh-so-proud enough of their deviancy to have 'come out' and declared their animal fucking to their IRL friends (:optimistic:, I know) family and coworkers 🤔 I would put money on it being very few, if any - because they know full well its absolutely disgusting and that they'd be lynched by anyone with even a modicum decency.

I wholeheartedly encourage them to come out as zoophiles to all and sundry IRL and accelerate the day of the rope for this filth.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kill all whales, IAmNotAlpharius, s0mbra and 6 others
Zoophiles and pedophiles are completely incapable of understanding that there's an inherent power imbalance involved with their relationships, and that's what makes turning them into sexual encounters unacceptable. They, by design, can never be equivocal because one party will always always have social, intellectual, financial, and legal power over the other.

If a boss cajoles their employee into sex, even if the employee is willing, it's still generally considered a no-no in most industries if the boss has direct financial control over their employee, because the company cannot prove that it wasn't a situation of financial abuse. Ergo, if a company finds out this is happening (unless they're shady as shit or the relationship started long before either party started working at the company) there's a good chance of one or both of them being fired to save face.

If a teacher fucks a student, even if that student is a grown-ass adult in college or university, it's still a problem because even if the student and teacher want to fuck, the teacher still has inherent power over the student's academic future. There is no way for the school to be able to ascertain that the teacher didn't artificially raise or lower the student's grade in correlation with the state of their relationship. It doesn't matter if they both 'wanted it', it's still considered a conflict of interest because of the power imbalance involved.

If a human fucks an animal, even if that animal is giving all the signs of wanting to fuck, it's still horrific because human beings (especially grown-ass adults) are supposed to be capable of comprehending that they have financial, social, sexual, intellectual, and legal power over that animal. It is an extreme power imbalance and arguing for the right to fuck or marry your dog does not mean that they can or ever will be granted the same legal protections that humans will, because we are unable to fully contextualize or comprehend the way they think or experience the world. We can make educated guesses and do research, but our capacity to understand is limited by our own inherent human bias.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Fireskull, _Blackbird_, Gaius Cumulus and 25 others
These people don't realize how hard it is to interpret animal body language, especially in dogs. Most people just assume that a dog wagging its tail or panting means it happy, which is usually not what it means. Anything a dog does can mean a variety of things and a dog likely won't mount a human and fuck his/her ass at random like these dudes say they will. I bet every one of these fuckers has to present themselves before the dog fucks them vice versa. We saw before that some dude who claimed his dog came onto him actually had to get the dog off first and touch its penis with his dirty hands.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: biledriver, Umaru Doma, Kill all whales and 5 others
Happens all the time, and not even just with zoophiles.
A dog panting and repeatedly licking its lips is anxious and stressed, not hungry or happy.
A horse rapidly nodding its head up and down is not saying "yes", it's usually a symptom of frustration, discomfort, or a neurological tic.
Dogs and cats will sometimes "make cute" and do things like meow, sneeze, roll on their bellies or offer to shake paws because they're frightened and want to appease you.
And what makes it worse is that it's all so very context-dependent. Don't even get me started on dog staring. It can mean anything from "I don't like you, fuck off" to "I love you!" to "Are you going to eat that or can I?"
There's a quote from The Life of Pi that I've always enjoyed--"when you look into the eyes of an animal, all you're seeing are your own emotions reflected back."
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Umaru Doma, NarutoYaoi, Drawdurd and 9 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back