- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
And if this fucking tard read the complaint he'd know it alleges exactly that kind of specific statement. Also he's just wrong. "Vic is a murderer" is also defamatory even if it doesn't specifically allege a particular murder. "Vic is a child molester" is also defamatory. So is "Vic is a sexual harasser." If you say that shit you'd best be prepared to prove at least a single instance of the behavior, because Vic simply swearing under oath "I have never sexually harassed anyone" proves the falsity of the statement in the absence of any evidence to the contrary.
And this stupid motherfucker is calling other people dumb despite being provably a tard mongoloid sped.
These people are so incredibly far behind in the law portion of this, and it's really pretty unsurprising given their hatred of Nick. They pretend like everything that comes out of his mouth is just biased nonsense.
Nick's whole schtick of being some angry drunk guy on YouTube has completely distracted them from the fact that while 10% of what he does is pounding down shots and ranting and swearing, the other 90% is incisive legal analysis in which he literally reads the entire court record verbatim to his viewers.
So anyone who regularly watches his streams knows every single fucking word that is actually in the record, making imbeciles like Akiva Cohen and Douchette look like the ignorant rubes they are when they make comments completely uninformed by reality.
Didn't he say he was still planning to but due to some costs he was waiting a bit?
It's not a terribly costly procedure as intellectual property law actions go, but remember that IP practice, even at its most rudimentary, is always going to have some overhead, and you have to budget in that things could get weird at any time if they actually put up a fight over it, which they probably will because why not?
I think they may have just taken a look at it already and decided it wasn't even worth contesting, because it's weird and unprofessional just not to respond at all, especially when Nick outright offered to pay them something for a limited license for the term.
Maybe they were just hoping he'd be busy doing other shit and not bother, and that's sort of happened with the Vic case being absolutely a nonstop rollercoaster ride of fun.
Don't think he wants to take it, just cancel it. It was in use long before they started using it and honestly i don't think "fear" comes to mind when you think of duck dynasty.
I think it's been genericided, assuming it wasn't always generic. They clearly have not enforced it at all. This isn't even something you need to be an IP lawyer to understand.
Look at all the Duck Dynasty merchandise on this image search for "fear the beard." Oh, there isn't any? People don't immediately think of Duck Dynasty when you say "fear the beard" and, if they think of anything, it's baseball?
They might just not own that trademark!
Last edited: