I think that's the big thing. I've written 10s, if not 100s of thousands of words worth of stuff on the Internet over the years. I can't remember fully 95% of it. Maybe if I worked at it, I could remember a modest amount of what I've written this year.
The stuff I've written that was directly about people actively in my life? Things like, say, close friends or a fiance getting sexually assaulted? That shit you remember writing, unless you literally have some sort of brain disorder or are so lacking in empathy you never considered that what you're saying could have real-life consequences for the parties involved. Hell, I'd never put anything on social media about a significant other without seriously considering if they'd be okay with me saying it.
At no point is it credible that he could actually forget all of those tweets. And this is even without noting that, at no point, does he look like he believes what he's saying.
Yup. It would stink to high heaven for any juror.
Especially since I believe Ty started reading from the tweets.
Any normal human being, even if they didn’t remember them off hand without getting help, would recognize at least some of the tweets, and start to remember a few details about when they wrote them, why they wrote them, etc.
That’s just how the human brain works.
Unless Ron goes full retard and starts sperging about having “alters” or being a “multiple system” or some shit like that (which would fuck them over in a somewhat different way) there’s no way it won’t come back to haunt them, if the case gets that far.
I guess that’s why we see all the BS about GFM. Their tard-trio of lawyers know they’re screwed if it goes to actual trial, so they’re trying to derail the case any way possible.
“The GFM proves that Vic is a public figure, TCPA PLOX!” is a Hail Mary, but it’s the best chance they got.
Toye?
sure, because it's amazing but it took me ages to find that, Vic's is... somewhere in Part one, I think?
Seriously, that's timestamped to the bit he loses the whole deposition.
That “My personal fiancé” is interesting.
What the hell is an impersonal fiancé? Like a public fiancé?
Is he calling Monica a WHORE?!?
When someone (who isn’t an outright sociopath) is being dishonest, they like to overplay their hand and weave in extra details or use superfluous language like that: It’s a way of trying to project certainty and honesty, when you know your position is untenable.
Even for someone who isn’t aware of this classic tell of dishonesty, that superfluous “personal” fiancé would most likely come across as weird. There’d be something about Ron’s testimony that bugs them, even if they might not be able to put a finger on exactly what.
