T. Greg Doucette / Thomas Gregory Doucette / greg_doucette / TGDLaw / fsckemall / lawdevnull / TDot - Super Lawyer, Failed Politician, Captain of The Threadnought, Drowning in Debt

[I can't imagine]

Saving these for future reference,
View attachment 848148

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "Funimation: 0% Marchi: 0% Toye: 0% Rial…

archived 19 Jul 2019 00:06:49 UTC

archive.fo

Rial getting downgraded because Stan Dahlin might wreck her testimony.
View attachment 848170

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "Hedging because I don't know what's in …

archived 19 Jul 2019 00:18:32 UTC

archive.fo

View attachment 848167

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "Well Funi is an inevitable result of pl…

archived 19 Jul 2019 00:14:04 UTC

archive.fo

View attachment 848163

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "So, TL;DR on Percy's amended petition: …

archived 19 Jul 2019 00:10:31 UTC

archive.fo

View attachment 848159

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "Let's be clear here: this deposition is…

archived 10 Jul 2019 17:27:50 UTC

archive.fo

View attachment 848157

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "8️⃣ So Funi is going to 100% guaranteed…

archived 19 Jul 2019 00:11:56 UTC

archive.fo

View attachment 848155

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "As to Funi, 100% Closer to 95% for the …

archived 19 Jul 2019 00:11:54 UTC

archive.fo

I like the notion that the potential of having Monica's key testimony in her deposition be utterly refuted by the witness she explicitly mentioned would give her a 0.001% chance of losing the TCPA. Not the case, the motion to determine if there even is a case. Good to know he's hedging his bets.

 

[NotaLolyer]

I had to crosspost this because this guy is so fucking bad at law.

If you want to advertise your practice to nobodies on twitter who will never actually hire you and look bad to everyone else who researches your practice, this is how you do it folks.

When you’re so bad at law (I was going to say Texas law but cuck lightyear is bad at all law) you don’t understand Texas rules of evidence 103 (d) does not apply to TCPA in a civil suit that hasn’t been to a jury stage yet.

https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1152210144664739843?s=21

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "No, it's a motion made under Texas Rule…

archived 19 Jul 2019 14:54:28 UTC

archive.fo

That whole twitter thread in general is a remarkable laugh if you want to read through the direct link of couchette taking out of context clips as a nice GOTCHA to the case. I’d archive it all but then it would have to go in the couchette thread and not in this law thread.

They still haven’t learned that context is what’s going to lose them their TCPAs and this case in the first place.

Edit: Holy fucking shit he doesn’t even understand sarcasm OR how Minnesota shield laws work

https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1152201229105344512?s=21

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: ""Did you just blow my source?" No, he b…

archived 19 Jul 2019 15:10:17 UTC

archive.fo

I’m going to have to crosspost this shit in the couchette thread now

 

[king of pickles]

And yet there's more and more Twitter lawyers popping up and dunking on Nick and Ty, just for some likes. People need to realize that some random lawyer's words on a case they didn't research is as valuable as a scientist's opinion on a matter they didn't research, especially when both have a bias or a monetary interest. But the mass still has that inherent notion to worship a degree without question.

 

[Immaculate Ape]

And yet there's more and more Twitter lawyers popping up and dunking on Nick and Ty, just for some likes. People need to realize that some random lawyer's words on a case they didn't research is as valuable as a scientist's opinion on a matter they didn't research, especially when both have a bias or a monetary interest. But the mass still has that inherent notion to worship a degree without question.

It's actually pretty comical that the troll accounts on twitter look almost identical to actual Law Twitter accounts... I can't wait to see the law twitter sycophants start liking and retweeting the troll accounts too

Mike Dunford on Twitter: "I saw the affidavit. He doesn't remember st…

archived 19 Jul 2019 17:27:14 UTC

archive.fo

T. Greg Douchette on Twitter: "But he didn't say it *didn't* happen, …

archived 19 Jul 2019 17:26:23 UTC

archive.li

 

[PrinceofAllCucks]

It's actually pretty comical that the troll accounts on twitter look almost identical to actual Law Twitter accounts... I can't wait to see the law twitter sycophants start liking and retweeting the troll accounts too


View attachment 849145

View attachment 849144

Mike Dunford on Twitter: "I saw the affidavit. He doesn't remember st…

archived 19 Jul 2019 17:27:14 UTC

archive.fo

T. Greg Douchette on Twitter: "But he didn't say it *didn't* happen, …

archived 19 Jul 2019 17:26:23 UTC

archive.li

Greg, there's a difference between him not remembering being included, and not knowing why you've been included.

 

[Immaculate Ape]

Greg, there's a difference between him not remembering being included, and not knowing why you've been included.

That's actually a troll account

I made the same mistake when I came across it this morning

 

[PrinceofAllCucks]

That's actually a troll account

I made the same mistake when I came across it this morning

Oh, God damn it. Parody accounts are becoming more convincing than the actual people they're based on.

 

[Son of Sparda 84]

Cross Posting

http://archive.is/foW0C

*Internal Screaming*

 

[Nontransferable]

From the TCPA document, (still waiting on the full release)

Mike Dunford on Twitter: "With an included exhibit where you're filed…

archived 19 Jul 2019 18:47:57 UTC

archive.fo

 

[HarblMcDavid]

Oh my god they kept a spreadsheet counting the number of "law twitter" commentators is this real life

Also love that it seems like the law twitter push was a direct action to attempt to manufacture evidence that Vic is a public figure

Even though the defamation at issue occurred months before law twitter got involved...so that will be an interesting argument.

 

[Genkoda]

This miserable faggot is still at it? Greg this is why KF is still interested in you. Not because of Ty, not because of Nick, but because you are a balding, fat, low T sperg. By the way has your girlfriend been coming home late as of lately? May want to look in on her activities since you obviously do not pay her much attention anymore.

 

[quickthrowaway]

I'm pretty sure you cannot use stupid shit like Craig's twitter sperging as proof of public figure status cause it all started long after the lawsuit itself started. Were Craig to have been commentating on it since day one, maybe. But Craig only got involved long after the slanderous statements and articles because whale pussy gets him thirsty.

Also I'm pretty sure someone here on the farms already predicted that they were gonna try and use the twitter lolyers to do this. These idiots are so predictable.

 

[TenMilesWide]

From the TCPA document, (still waiting on the full release)
View attachment 849274

View attachment 849266

View attachment 849271

Mike Dunford on Twitter: "With an included exhibit where you're filed…

archived 19 Jul 2019 18:47:57 UTC

archive.fo

View attachment 849275View attachment 849276View attachment 849277

>Percy
>Inability to read
>LOLyer
Wait a goddamn minute, that's from the actual TCPA motion? So MoRon's defense are now resorting to childish jabs at opposing counsel's intelligence within the exhibits? Is that what's going on here?

Y'know when we said that it wouldn't slow down, that the stupidity would continue to escalate, I kinda hoped we were wrong.

 

[TheClappening]

Am I reading this wrong, or did they use "LOLyer" in an official court document?

What the actual fuck.

 

[Far Queue]

Christ alive, this TCPA is a fucking dumpster fire. The only thing more embarrassing are the hot takes from law twitter.

I honestly think that Monica and Ron had to put most of this together and just get their lawyers to sign off on it. I'm not even sure if they even took the time to look through all of it either, because if they did, I'm not even sure that they would have signed off on it. I don't know if it's a big deal, but some of the exhibits are out of order or have duplicate letters. For fucks sake this is sad.

Well at least Nick has another several days worth of shows just sorting through and trying to understand that fucking pile off mess.

 

[Disheveled Pizza]

From the TCPA document, (still waiting on the full release)
View attachment 849274

View attachment 849266

View attachment 849271

Mike Dunford on Twitter: "With an included exhibit where you're filed…

archived 19 Jul 2019 18:47:57 UTC

archive.fo

View attachment 849275View attachment 849276View attachment 849277

I legitimately thought this was just a mock up done as a joke by some parody account, this is the stupidest thing in the world and more than anything proves the opposite of what they claim. A list of professionals who have all claimed "I had no idea who Vic was before this lawsuit" and them only paying attention to Vic directly because of the defendant's defamation is somehow proof he's a public figure who is super well known and caused all this himself?

 

[king of pickles]

Remember guys, you too can make an account and pretend to be a lawyer. You can make the most retarded points, as long as you have "I'm with Her" stickers and use "NeverBlumpf" hashtags, the other pretend lawyers will agree with everything you say. I wonder how many of those sacks of shit simply take MoRonica's side because they hate Nick and his guts.

 

[ThonyTheThaigirl]

View attachment 849187View attachment 849188View attachment 849190View attachment 849191View attachment 849192
Cross Posting

http://archive.li/foW0C

*Internal Screaming*

Imagine actually saying that under a preponderance of the evidence, a "Vic did x thing, and Stan did z thing" vs a "I, Vic, did not do x thing" along with "I, Stan, did not do z thing, I'd remember if I did, and I'd have acted differently since then if I did" that the former would be the winner, especially when the party that stated the former specifically brought forth this witness. Seriously imagine suggesting that AS A FUCKING LAWYER, and then imagine suggesting that this doesn't even meet the prima facie standard, which is even LOWER than the standard of preponderance of the evidence.

 

[DrearyDoomguy]

Remember guys, you too can make an account and pretend to be a lawyer. You can make the most exceptional points, as long as you have "I'm with Her" stickers and use "NeverBlumpf" hashtags, the other pretend lawyers will agree with everything you say. I wonder how many of those sacks of shit simply take MoRonica's side because they hate Nick and his guts.

I don’t think these are fake lawyers. I think these are people who are competent at interpreting the law (at least, enough to pass the bar) and woefully deficient in every other regard.

 

[The Littlest Shitlord]

Maybe they know the law, maybe they don't. The thing is, they don't care. Just like how an addict will say anything to get his fix, these social media junkies will say anything to get replies, likes, and retweets. It's scummy behavior, but they are confident it will never affect their real lives. And unfortunately, it probably won't.