Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

I went back through the affidavits to find how many of them were first-person accounts of harassment by Vic - so not counting accounts of "I heard about/saw Vic bothering someone else." I found three. So much for the hundreds of women.

Code:
AFFIDAVITS WITH FIRST-PERSON HARASSMENT CLAIMS
----------------------------------------------

293    Affidavit of Blankenship-McConnell

While a sophomore in high school and in a school play, Vic-senpai noticed me.
In summer of 1989, unvited me to his house to see Christian video but instead
tried to seduce me. After many rejections he became hostile. I left. I felt
scared when seeing him afterwards.

297    Affidavit of Kara Edwards

At Animazement in 2008, we had separate hotel rooms with a communal door
5 them. One night Vic gave me a long hug, then we went to separate rooms.
Vic knocked on door and called me; "nobody has to know." I went into bathroom,
literally shaking. At ShadoCon 2010, he invited me to his room to catch up.
He petted me and whispered in my ear and would not let me leave (No mention of
if/how she left this situation.) Another night he asked to come inside my room.
I rejected him. He lied about incident in the i09 article.

345    Affidavit of Kelly Loftus

At Kawaii Kon in 2014, I got something autographed by Vic for a friend. We
also took a photo together during which Vic was very handsy. We took another
photo during wich Vick gave me an unwanted kiss on the cheek.

Both the affidavits of Neysha Perry and Emmett Plant claim Vic did the hair-pull-whisper thing to a Star Trek cosplayer at a con in 2013, but there is no account from the cosplayer herself.
 
These stories in the affidavits are hilariously bad.

From Adam Sheehan's:

View attachment 849425

So anything Sheehan says is worth less than shit since by his own admission Vic always behaved in front of him. Literally everything he says is second hand or irrelevant gossip.

View attachment 849434

How can he claim to know why Vic goes to smaller conventions? Is he a mind reader? Maybe Vic is friends with the owner, or wants to meet fans who can't afford the big shows, or he just wants to have an excuse to visit a particular city. Sheehan's whole thing is garbage.
So someone explain again how they are not employees of Funimation if they are answering to Funimation and Funimation is coordinating some of their con appearances.
 
Speaking of ignorance and stupidity,
Lemon Fuhrer has this in his exhibits:

Lemoine LOLsuit Confusion.PNG


Lemoine LOLsuit Confusion 2.PNG


Lemoine, you West Nile virus-ridden dumbass! "LOLsuit" is a direct reference to George Ouzounian v. Dax Herrera et al, you idiot!
Maybe you should look it up before you make the same mistakes as Kevin Landau (Ouzounian's lawyer)!
 
Speaking of ignorance and stupidity,
Lemon Fuhrer has this in his exhibits:

View attachment 849446

View attachment 849447

Lemoine, you West Nile virus-ridden dumbass! "LOLsuit" is a direct reference to George Ouzounian v. Dax Herrera et al, you idiot!
Maybe you should look it up before you make the same mistakes as Kevin Landau (Ouzounian's lawyer)!
I don't know how happy a Judge is going to be with someone using a legal document to insult opposing council, while they're protected from defametory lawsuits, it's still something a judge can hold against you on a personal level which wont be good for any motion you bring. Generally judges are pretty big sticklers for professional decorum.
 
Speaking of ignorance and stupidity,
Lemon Fuhrer has this in his exhibits:

View attachment 849446

View attachment 849447

Lemoine, you West Nile virus-ridden dumbass! "LOLsuit" is a direct reference to George Ouzounian v. Dax Herrera et al, you idiot!
Maybe you should look it up before you make the same mistakes as Kevin Landau (Ouzounian's lawyer)!
I was gonna crosspost from the doucette thread about the lolyer spreadsheet earlier but got distracted. Holy shit, they're using the 500 page TCPA motion to lob childish insults at opposing counsel, I think the weeb wars really may be a lolsuit to surpass madcucks. I'm sure the judge is gonna love it.
 
And why is this in a TCPA filing? This is a matter of fact? This is a question for trial. The same with all of these other fraudulent affidavits.
They've set themselves the retarded goal of winning the case at the TCPA motion, so they're trying to argue their whole case in the TCPA motion. Ironically doing so has nearly guaranteed that their TCPA motion will be dismissed.
 
Anime Matsuri is one of the largest anime conventions in North America. What in the fuck are they talking about?

I wonder if he's a part of the BAM (Boycott Anime Matsuri) group and just had to throw that subtle jab in there.

I really hope that BHBH gives Nick an extra bomb or two to drop this evening. I would imagine that they're a little pissed off at this, if for no other reason than this motion is a fucking disgrace to their profession, so I could see Ty responding in kind.
 
Correct me if im wrong, but wasnt filing a TCPA for MoRon kinda a bad idea, especially when it was done at the last possible chance? And now Judge Chupp does not only have to deal with the idiocy of the TCPA, but its actually over 500 pages long? Ooh nelly every time i think this lawsuit might be toning down just a bit it finds a new gear to kick in and just goes full throttle
 
Finished my ToC at http://collabedit.com/vccd7 . Gonna repost it here since someone has already tried to blank the document, so lame gay ops may be afoot.

Code:
Page   Description
1      Introduction
29     Mignogna deposition
103    Tweet from @ActuallyAmelia
104    Polygon article
108    Pridemore Facebook post
117    ANN article
126    Dao of Dragonball article
199    Mignogna profile on Rooster Teeth site
200    Notorious Funimation tweets
201    Gizmodo article
220    GoFundMe screenshot
221    Email thread between Huber and Rial
225    Email thread between Huber, Rial and Marchi
229    "Apology" tweet from Mignogna
230    "Dear Monica" from Mignogna to Rial (CC'd to Funi staff)
231    "Plz no bully" tweet from Mignogna
232    GFM announcement tweet from Mignogna
233    Pro-Vic character statement from Alyssa Fluty
235    Independent contractor agreement between RT and Mignogna
       (Vic's address doxed?)
242    Rial's amended objections to Plaintiff's First RfP
249    "Noroki-chan" LiveJournal post Re: "Rumors Panel"
256    C&D from BHBH to Marchi (Marchi's address doxed?)
269    Demand for Preservation from BHBH to Marchi
272    Email thread between Mignogna and Tammi Denbow
277    "Vic Mignogna: Allegations" (PULL-related Google doc, I think)
290    Mignoga asking Rangers to counter negativity
291    Rangers Discord chat
293    Affidavit of Blankenship-McConnell (high school play story)
297    Affidavit of Kara Edwards (literally raped story plus later creepiness)
306    Email from Edwards to unknown person recounting same stories
310    Affidavit of Lynn Hunt, con staff; "high-risk guest;" Tekkoshocon/Ijima (2007)
316    Affidavit of Faisal Ahmed, Kawaii Kon CEO; Complaints of creepiness
320    Email from Kelly Loftus to Kawaii Kon re 2014 allegation
323    Affidavit of Mary Reese, handler; creepiness
329    Affidavit of Whitney Falba, con staff; Tekko '07; no Ijima story
335    Affidavit of Neysha Perry, cosplayer/performer; Bayou Con '13
337    Affidavit of Emmett Plant, Star Trek staffer, Perry's boyfriend
340    Affidavit of Adam Sheehan, Funi staff; claims of creepiness
345    Affidavit of Kelly Loftus; recounting of story above (pg 320)
350    Tweet from Kelly Loftus (@kellyonelani) about same story
352    Tweet thread between Loftus and Kawaii Kon
354    Same email between Loftus and Kawaii Kon as starts on 320 (lolololo)
357    Affidavit of Michele Specht, Mignogna's ex-fiance
361    Email from Specht to Mignogna cc Hansell re Vic cheating
364    Email from Mignogna to Specht; apologetic
364    Email response from Specht; "destruction"
368    Email response from Mignogna; "amends"
370    Affidavit of John Prager, con staff; Tekko/Ijima (2010), other creepiness
       (note date contradiction with 310 Re: Ijima story)
374    Deposition of Rial
396    Various tweets from Rial
402    Deposition of Toye
433    Declaration of Lemoine Re: Rekieta and "War Chest"
439    Rekieta legal case history
442    Mignogna resume
446    Screenshot of Vic's website
450    Screenshot of Vic's website
452    Screenshot of Star Trek Continues website
455    Vic's IMDB page
500    Livejournal posts from Vic's mother (yes, really)
510    Variety article re lawsuit
517    Defense's timeline
519    Declaration of Rial
522    Spreadsheets of unclear meaning/relevance
Quantity over quality has been a kickvic theme.
 
So the farms have made her life a living hell by putting out her info but the only harassment she gets is social media messages? Not even a pizza? Get real.
We’re dealing with people who don’t know how the internet works. And this judge and a jury don’t know how Kiwi Farms operates. Of course the horror stories are what’s gonna happen. Maybe one of the Nock deposition things is to get Farms bashing on record.

Oh hey look, Vic said he never had a thing with Monica, only a platonic friendship. Guess she 100% made up the hotel thing.

View attachment 849372

Edit: They also didn't redact Vic's address or cell phone number, not sure if they were supposed to.
Myth busted. What a shame.

Not Sabat

View attachment 849415
So much for there being a shadow master, I guess.

In regards to the TCPA, they use a picture that the girl in it said was cool with it and told everybody using her to pound sand. And that it was found that that picture was used to plant phony evidence. Has that shit been put on record yet?
 
Last edited:
I went back through the affidavits to find how many of them were first-person accounts of harassment by Vic - so not counting accounts of "I heard about/saw Vic bothering someone else." I found three. So much for the hundreds of women.

Code:
AFFIDAVITS WITH FIRST-PERSON HARASSMENT CLAIMS
----------------------------------------------

293    Affidavit of Blankenship-McConnell

While a sophomore in high school and in a school play, Vic-senpai noticed me.
In summer of 1989, unvited me to his house to see Christian video but instead
tried to seduce me. After many rejections he became hostile. I left. I felt
scared when seeing him afterwards.

297    Affidavit of Kara Edwards

At Animazement in 2008, we had separate hotel rooms with a communal door
5 them. One night Vic gave me a long hug, then we went to separate rooms.
Vic knocked on door and called me; "nobody has to know." I went into bathroom,
literally shaking. At ShadoCon 2010, he invited me to his room to catch up.
He petted me and whispered in my ear and would not let me leave (No mention of
if/how she left this situation.) Another night he asked to come inside my room.
I rejected him. He lied about incident in the i09 article.

345    Affidavit of Kelly Loftus

At Kawaii Kon in 2014, I got something autographed by Vic for a friend. We
also took a photo together during which Vic was very handsy. We took another
photo during wich Vick gave me an unwanted kiss on the cheek.

Both the affidavits of Neysha Perry and Emmett Plant claim Vic did the hair-pull-whisper thing to a Star Trek cosplayer at a con in 2013, but there is no account from the cosplayer herself.

And of those we have one that has been widely debunked, one that is a "kiss on the cheek" and one that at best would be a matter for trial as Ms. Edwards says in her afidavit that Vic himself denies that the events described ever happened. Why the Fuck is any of this in a TCPA filing?

As I'm going through this I am also trying to work something out. Please those more knowledgeable help me out. But everything in this is blind blanket attacks on Vic. Nothing in it seemingly is directed to any of the Causes of Action or the claims against the defendants. And this is where I am having trouble with the "joint filing" by both defendants. At every turn under deposition, when asked why he made the public claims he did Toye answered "I don't know" and "I can't remember". with regard to 400+ specific statements. At that point none of this should be admissible in his defense. He is the Defendant. Vic is the Plaintiff. The case is about Mr. Toye's words. Which he cannot explain or remember. It does not matter what internet rabbit hole Casey and Lemonhead have darted down to find some internet mean girls willing to slag somebody. The Defendant has already disavowed any influence by them. "I don't recall". How can these be used to defend Ron's Right of Free Speech, when he has no memory of them under oath?

how can this filing be separated between the two defendants Monica Rial and Ronald Toye? It seems to be getting into a real problematic area, doesn't it?
 
Back