- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
So correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t the fact that the TCPA’s are heavy on witness testimony make it more likely that they’ll be dismissed? Even if most of them are second and third hand accounts that may already be demonstrably false with the current evidence, the fact that Vic and his team will contest them as matters of fact makes it more evident that this needs to go to trial, not less.
A'yup! MoRonica's TCPA seems insane. It is packed with tons of stuff that is under contention and would need determination at trial, it is jam packed with clearly inadmissible evidence. And it has literally nothing in support of challenging the Plaintiff's causes of action, save a blanket unsupported statement that Vic is a Public figure. Which is once again something that would need arguing at trial.
Vic has a very compelling counter argument that he has been libeled and defamed as a pedophile directly to employers, business partners and potential employers, not simply openly in public, but direct non public lobbying by the defendants towards his business interests. He has lost his jobs his career and is a pariah based on this. If this behavior is somehow shielded under the TCPA than there no longer are any Defamation or Libel laws in Texas.