I just watched that part and I fully agree: that was absolutely disgraceful.
And to be honest, I still have a problem with the way he's doing this Minecraft auction thing with both bits and dollars vs. the rules set by Twitch... I mean, people in his chat are openly discussing how many dollars need to be donated to beat a certain amount of bits and DSP blatantly compares bits to money on multiple occasions.
For archival purposes, here's a small montage of DSP basically giving the "exchange rate" of bits <=> dollars:
View attachment 853282
And here are some examples of his chat discussing and questioning the value of bits vs. dollars:
View attachment 853280
Surely this is not what Twitch had in mind when they introduced bits with a rule that says "bits are not a money instrument"? And I know that some of the chat messages above may very well be from possible detractors trying to stir shit, but that's not the point here: in the end, DSP is responsible for not instigating conversation on his channel that is against Twitch' terms of service.
Oh, and I'm not sure if ThatAnonyMouse was being ironic or not, but it looked he was trying to make it seem like DSP was upholding the rules regarding bits:
View attachment 853295
Especially that last question is a very good one, because indeed: how can you actually determine the top contributor between cheers and tips when bits aren't money? How does that work? What formula does DSP use to solve this complex math problem?
Well, offering the "service" (giving a name to something in Minecraft) in and of itself isn't the problem; according to Twitch' rules it's perfectly fine to "reward" a viewer that way for cheering. Though when you start organizing auctions between tippers and cheerers where only one of those can win, you're setting yourself up for possible violations of the terms.