- Joined
- Aug 16, 2018
They are still on this story?
If he believed in human rights, he wouldn’t be pushing for socialism
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Thread starter Randall Fragg
- Start date
They are still on this story?
If he believed in human rights, he wouldn’t be pushing for socialism
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
I think 'haven't' was a typo and should be 'have.' Because the next sentence she says Mueller's credibility is still intact.
So I think she meant to say 'I don't think Republicans have been particularly effective, meanwhile, at undermining Mueller's credibility'. Which is completely absurd and delusional.
Weppers
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2018
It was a Freudian slip.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2017
This is a common error among stupid people: They think that stout denial of the obvious is a strong tactic. It is not. It is weak. And the more they sell themselves on their own bullshit, the greater the enthusiasm with which they step onto the next rake.
In fact, that's pretty much exactly how we got here. The jeering certainty on the left that Mueller would spell the end of Trump kept feeding on itself, and its mindless perpetuators felt like they'd stepped off a curb when it didn't happen that way. But did they learn anything from this? No.
In a way, they're almost admitting that this type of Big Lie has been their favored tactic for decades. Why else would they keep trying it? But it's a lot easier to spend credibility than to bank it, and these prodigals have been on a spending spree, especially since 2016. Time to pay the bill, liars.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2016
SJWs even double down on their negatives.
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2019
The Babylon Bee is the best satire site out there today. Prove me wrong.
Given that Mueller said that Trump can be charged after he's out of office, are they going to switch off the impeachment plan and wait to try and nail him after he gets out?
A couple of places are running with that:
Mueller: Trump could be charged with obstruction of justice after leaving office
Former special counsel Robert Mueller on Wednesday said that he believes President Trump could be charged with obstruction of justice after he leaves office.
Mueller confirms that a president can be indicted after leaving office
Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller is maintaining that his investigation team did not have the authority to indict a sitting president, citing an opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel. But he did leave the door open for the future. During Mueller's testimony before the House Judiciary...
theweek.com
Mueller: A president could be criminally charged after leaving office
Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller tells GOP Rep Buck, who seems surprised to hear it, that President Trump could be criminally charged with obstruction of justice after he leaves office.
Only problem is waiting till Trump's out means waiting for at least a year, and I don't think they have the patience for that. Oh yeah, and their candidates for 2020 are terrible; good luck with that election.
I
IV 445
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Well they got their soundbite. We could have used that chamber for more productive things, but hey the 
clappers got their precious hatred fuel for the next few days.
clappers got their precious hatred fuel for the next few days.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2016
The Babylon Bee is the best satire site out there today. Prove me wrong.
Given that Mueller said that Trump can be charged after he's out of office, are they going to switch off the impeachment plan and wait to try and nail him after he gets out?
A couple of places are running with that:
Mueller: Trump could be charged with obstruction of justice after leaving office
Former special counsel Robert Mueller on Wednesday said that he believes President Trump could be charged with obstruction of justice after he leaves office.thehill.com
Mueller confirms that a president can be indicted after leaving office
Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller is maintaining that his investigation team did not have the authority to indict a sitting president, citing an opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel. But he did leave the door open for the future. During Mueller's testimony before the House Judiciary...Mueller: A president could be criminally charged after leaving office
Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller tells GOP Rep Buck, who seems surprised to hear it, that President Trump could be criminally charged with obstruction of justice after he leaves office.www.msnbc.com
Only problem is waiting till Trump's out means waiting for at least a year, and I don't think they have the patience for that. Oh yeah, and their candidates for 2020 are terrible; good luck with that election.
And good luck with opening the can of worms that is "prosecute your predecessor." I'm sure none of them has anything that can be used against them by the next person to displace them.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
Hard for me to argue when one of the writers is the creator of AXE COP and they anger the right people...
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
Remember when they were all losing their fucking minds over Trump saying he would have the DOJ look into Hillary Clinton's crimes, and saying "It doesn't matter if she's guilty, it's still prosecuting your political opponents!"?
I guess they don't.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2016
I think they're more than willing to take that risk. Someone has to pay for 2016.
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2019
At this point, the only ones paying for 2016 are any sane individuals left in the Democratic Party.
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2015
No bad tactics, only bad targets.
Can anybody specifically name exactly what Trump did that was obstruction? Did he refuse to answer questions? Burn evidence? Threaten people? Given that they can't even prove a crime occurred, what specifically can they charge him for?
I know, I know, one must be able to prove a negative to be innocent now, but really.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
Even Mueller can't. A Republican asked him directly if his investigation was actually obstructed or impeded in any way. He said no.
So they're basically saying they want to prosecute Trump for maybe wanting to obstruct the investigation but not actually doing it. They're talking literal thought crime level stuff here.
I will say I think the Dems and their loyal minions are most likely to huff and puff over this for a few days and then memory hole it and move on to something else. The radio news today seemed to really want to avoid talking about it... they obviously had to talk about it some because they'd hyped it up so much leading up to this, but instead of just streaming it live like they do when they think something's going to go well for them, they were focusing on puff pieces and foreign stories, just doing occasional little interludes about the Mueller testimony and giving obviously carefully selected sound bites trying to make it look better for the Dems but they weren't succeeding very well. If I had to guess, they'll probably shift to talking vaguely about "the Russia investigation" in the future and try to act like Mueller himself doesn't exist.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
So why is it only illegal once he’s out of office? Because that sounds like bullshit.
- Joined
- May 25, 2018
Translation: "I get my panties in a bunch over satire! REEEEEEEEE"
God, I hate these people.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2016
But I'll wager he'd be the first to say that "Christianists" are the ones with no sense of humor.
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
tl;dr The President in office is basically legally immune from a lot of things so that they can run the country instead being in court defending themselves. Once out of office, they are legally speaking a normal citizen like everyone else.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
Christ, imagine if he did have to go to court every time they wanted to try and pin something on him.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2016
It's a kangaroo court with kangaroo charges. The People's Court declared Trump guilty the moment he won the election.