Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
You realize there's no point in arguing semantics, right? There is no objective difference.
the objective difference is irrelevant, yes, but what's important is how trivialized rape today is. what was once a serious crime is now both expanded to extremes and a joke where "men" are claiming that i raped a woman who called me on the phone to offer sex and buy me a chocolate later. my article on rape will be called Buy your rapist a chocolate
 
- yes, and it was a horrible decision
- i don't care what a feminist marriage does or doesn't do
- i agree with the last sentence, when said about you

Translation: REALITY IS WRONG.

the objective difference is irrelevant, yes, but what's important is how trivialized rape today is. what was once a serious crime is now both expanded to extremes and a joke where "men" are claiming that i raped a woman who called me on the phone to offer sex and buy me a chocolate later. my article on rape will be called Buy your rapist a chocolate

What in the everloving fuck are you talking about, you stupid shitlord? Rape isn't "trivialized". It's still taken pretty fucking seriously. The law doesn't take too kindly to retarded sperglords like yourself attempting to insert your wrinkled pencildick into someone who hasn't consented to it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
What in the everloving fuck are you talking about, you stupid shitlord? Rape isn't "trivialized". It's still taken pretty fucking seriously. /QUOTE]
This thread alone should tell you that this is nonsense. Feminist "men" here are, with all seriousness, claiming that i raped a woman who called me on the phone to offer sex, bought me a chocolate later, broke the agreed upon no-contact rule and was in a relationship with me a week later.
 
the objective difference is irrelevant, yes, but what's important is how trivialized rape today is. what was once a serious crime is now both expanded to extremes and a joke where "men" are claiming that i raped a woman who called me on the phone to offer sex and buy me a chocolate later. my article on rape will be called Buy your rapist a chocolate

I agree that the trivialization of rape is a big problem, which is exactly what you're doing. Claiming women want to be raped is about the worst thing you can say to prevent it. Your insistence that Macie and other women like her weren't raped harms all rape victims. You can juggle dictionaries and books of law all day, but what you're doing is rape apologism, plain and simple.
 
Translation: REALITY IS WRONG.
translation: just because something is law now doesn't mean it is good. there were many bad, insane laws in history.

I agree that the trivialization of rape is a big problem, which is exactly what you're doing.
Feminist "men" here are, with all seriousness, claiming that i raped a woman who called me on the phone to offer sex, bought me a chocolate later, broke the agreed upon no-contact rule and was in a relationship with me a week later.
 
Guess who's blocking people again!
  • 24isthehighestnumber [remove] 4670 123

@Holden, why do you still even bother? Are you just that dense?

who called me on the phone to offer sex, bought me a chocolate later, broke the agreed upon no-contact rule and was in a relationship with me a week later.

Adding big bold letters doesn't suddenly make any of this true.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
- yes, and it was a horrible decision
- i don't care what a feminist marriage does or doesn't do
- i agree with the last sentence, when said about you
You do realize that the civil law tradition to which your people have always subscribed has always criminalized seduction and sexual assault. That the word "rape" wasn't necessarily applied to those crimes doesn't make them any less immoral or criminal.
 
@Holden

LEARN HOW TO PROPERLY QUOTE PEOPLE, ASSHAT.

No one seriously believes you raped a woman, you dumb sperg. Because that would imply that you actually touched a woman. That said, though, the fact that you continue to bring it up is pretty fucking creepy, and sad. Like, wow, dude, you daydream of raping a woman.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
Feminist "men" here are, with all seriousness, claiming that i raped a woman who called me on the phone to offer sex, bought me a chocolate later, broke the agreed upon no-contact rule and was in a relationship with me a week later.

NQHKSVE.gif
 
No one seriously believes you raped a woman, you dumb sperg. Because that would imply that you actually touched a woman.
really? would you mind asking the men who claimed this again? they sounded extremely serious to me.

then don't believe me. don't believe anything i say about anything. maybe i'm actually an employed feminist stud.
 
really? would you mind asking the men who claimed this again? they sounded extremely serious to me.
I don't believe you've ever seen a vagina, even when you were born. You probably shat inside your mother, requiring a c-section and leaving a massive scar.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Nad and Lurker
really? would you mind asking the men who claimed this again? they sounded extremely serious to me.

See, that's the autism talking. I know you're too braindead to infer "tone" from text on the internet, but it's something you need to learn on your own. I'm not going to do your research for you, faggot.
 
Do you actually believe your flabby ass is capable of raping anyone? If so what items would you find essential for your rape kit?
 
- yes, and it was a horrible decision
- i don't care what a feminist marriage does or doesn't do
- i agree with the last sentence, when said about you
so you aren't contending that anything i said was inaccurate but you are trying to say that i don't know what i am talking about, interesting.

question, have you ever done any reading about Narcissistic Personality Disorder?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back