Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you actually believe your flabby ass is capable of raping anyone? If so what items would you find essential for your rape kit?
you know i can't speak about such things. your insane asses would like nothing more than for me to say the wrong think so that delusions of insane men here could be fed by a some feminist drum court while women stay assured that real rapists are protected by dumb, insane men like saney or 24 once again being scared into submission.
 
so you aren't contending that anything i said was inaccurate but you are trying to say that i don't know what i am talking about, interesting.

question, have you ever done any reading about Narcissistic Personality Disorder?
i am saying it is accurate, but my point is that something being law doesn't make it so. if somebody made a law that says i am a frog it won't make me a frog.

- i have read about it but think pd's are pseudomedicine. their objective standard for diagnosis isn't what is a standard for any other field of medicine.
 
you know i can't speak about such things. your insane asses would like nothing more than for me to say the wrong think so that delusions of insane men here could be fed by a some feminist drum court while women stay assured that real rapists are protected by dumb, insane men like saney or 24 once again being scared into submission.

Holy fuck I got him to admit to having a rape kit.
 
as for you and your insanity, 24, just see how it easy it is to get accused of rape http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324600704578405280211043510
This is an opinion article. Digging into it more, you find out that the "story" that's talked about never even happened. There was no son that was "accused" of rape. He was accused of assaulting a girl (non-sexually). There were videos of it and he had been told of his impending court hearing months before he told his mother.
macie - i have talked about wanting a relationship. but a relationship with somebody who can be in one. can modern western women be in one?
Yes, yes they can. A relationship is an agreement between two+ alive entities. Dogs can be friends with cats, that's a relationship; humans can be friends with dogs, that's a relationship. Donkeys can be mates with Horses... that's how mules are made. Humans can be in relationships with any other human if that's what they agree upon. They can be enemies (that's a relationship of a sort), they can be friends, they can be co-workers, they can be romantically involved, they can be sex buddies, etc. If a man wants to be with another man, that's fine; if a woman wants to be with another woman, that's fine too. They are both still relationships. So yes, modern western women can be in relationships. YOU, Holden, do not determine what is a relationship and what isn't if you are not a party to the relationship. It'd be like me going up to a man and another man and screaming "YOU ARE NOT FRIENDS!!! YOU CANNOT BE FRIENDS!!" It's not my right to decide who can be in a relationship or not.
use your brain. i said that not many men who have kids do rape
We have tons of evidence that proves otherwise. You have nothing except your opinion that men with kids and a wife don't need to rape.
1) 22 percent of men accused of rape. not rapists. explained why.
2) rainn doesn't understand the nature of a contract like marriage, which already gives consent in itself. a woman can be assaulted in marriage but not raped.
3) you'd know, honey ;)
Nope, the records show that 22% of men who are in prison for sexual assault are married. Not accused. They are fully prosecuted and convicted. Who the fuck is rainn? Omg... I'm going to be physically sick. Holden just called me honey.
Learn to use the quote button fucktard. And stop spamming things in bold
Feminist "men" here are, with all seriousness, claiming that i raped a woman who called me on the phone to offer sex, bought me a chocolate later, broke the agreed upon no-contact rule and was in a relationship with me a week later.
Here's the bold again. You've changed your story THREE TIMES with this girl. The first time you said that you called her and told her that you'd take the picture down if she fucked you. The second time you said that she magically called you, never having seen the picture (so why'd she call? the fuck?) and then you brought up the picture and said you'd take it down if she fucked you... and you claim you had to buy her chocolates afterwards. That's how you excused the "blackmail" claims. You said it wasn't rape because you bought her stuff afterwards. AND NOW. Now you're saying that she called you up on the phone, bought YOU candy, and then fucked you and started a relationship with you?
Yeah, I don't buy it. You're just a big fat ugly liar. Jesus, you fucked one girl in your life and it lasted less than 20 seconds. She laughed at you, you cried, and you haven't had sex since. Just get over it already.
 
This is an opinion article. Digging into it more, you find out that the "story" that's talked about never even happened. There was no son that was "accused" of rape. He was accused of assaulting a girl (non-sexually). There were videos of it and he had been told of his impending court hearing months before he told his mother.
But that was before my son, a senior at a small liberal-arts college in New England, was charged—by an ex-girlfriend—with alleged acts of "nonconsensual sex" that supposedly occurred during the course of their relationship a few years earlier.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324600704578405280211043510

as for the rest, i am obviously talking about a romantic relationship. you just once again prove you have no idea what this is.
 
as here, there were posters who were and weren't.
Oh, you were able to tell who was fucking with you?
@Holden posted a few times about female posters on other boards who totes agreed with him on rapists being worshipped by women. When pressed these boards no longer existed, no screen shots, maybe it was only one board ......the usual lies.
Staminarose forums no longer exist.

You sure know how to sniff out the people who were fucking with you @Holden. Fantastic job.
 
You said horse was a slut and that she was insane.
i might have told so to horse but only cause she made hurtful statements. but my point is that she is obviously serious, and so were the posters there.

Oh, you were able to tell who was fucking with you?
as you might had noticed, there are dozens of people i just ignore
 
But that was before my son, a senior at a small liberal-arts college in New England, was charged—by an ex-girlfriend—with alleged acts of "nonconsensual sex" that supposedly occurred during the course of their relationship a few years earlier.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324600704578405280211043510

as for the rest, i am obviously talking about a romantic relationship. you just once again prove you have no idea what this is.
AND LIKE I SAID, that article has been circulating the internet forever. It's false. The mother was lied to, by the son, and went ranting before she knew the fuck was going on. The son told her this shit, but what really happened (according to videos), was that he beat her up when she was with another guy. He was charged with it, he lied to his parents. End of discussion.

Despite that, this woman clearly states she's a feminist. Why the fuck are you reading her shit anyway?
Here, I can counter post shit too.
http://www.thefrisky.com/2013-04-18...ens-victim-blaming-wall-street-journal-op-ed/
http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/fuck-you-judith-grossman/

All of these articles are explaining what's wrong with the way this woman thinks. None of them are the articles that describe what's wrong with her story. Again, she claims to be a feminist, you claim to hate feminism... why are you willing to use their articles when it's relevant to you, but not if it can in some way damage your opinions? Seems a tad childish.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Johnny Bravo
i am saying it is accurate, but my point is that something being law doesn't make it so. if somebody made a law that says i am a frog it won't make me a frog.

a marriage contract is a legal document what it is and isn't is governed solely by law. the comparison is invalid unless you are an animated pile of litigation IRL

- i have read about it but think pd's are pseudomedicine. their objective standard for diagnosis isn't what is a standard for any other field of medicine.

do you think you show symptoms of NPD?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back