I can't believe arguments like this are still floating around this thread. BHBH has the funds to reply to absurd shit for days and weeks and years. The people who don't have the money are the defendants, who are potentially going to have to pay for their lawyers to defend this in front of a judge.
This is a completely absurd argument that keeps popping up. It's false in and of itself. This "tactic" produces the exact opposite of what people are claiming it does: it ends up spending money from people that DON'T have the money to spend.
This filings are NOT intended to drain Vic's warchest, they don't do anything noticeable to that effect, nor does it matter to any of the parties involved in this lawsuit since Vic's funds (which are public) can be used to sue them two or three times over, shenanigans or not. No one on the defendants side is thinking of this as a drainage tactic because 1. it doesn't work and 2. it drains their funds, not Vic's. Maybe it drains a little more of Vic's than theirs, but Vic is not hurting for money, they are. It hurts them that much more.
Please stop making this argument, it's entirely nonsensical and extremely short-sighted to even say it.