Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Wait, ManJaw is the one who set Scott Adams off for two days straight?‽ He even did an hour long Periscope stream about it.

Holy shit, the Weeb Wars cows are going into cow overload all over the place.

I would love to see those streams if they are online.
 
"Plaintiff has pleaded that Ms. Rial is a “user” of Twitter and bases his claims (in part, an in particular the viral firestorm) on such use."

Another great one:

"Here, Mignogna clearly invited and consented to comments about his behavior, and Moving Defendants were privileged in their communications on Twitter. Mignogna released several statements online in order to spin the narrative in his favor."

So if you say "I never did these things and it's not me. Please spread your positive stories about me to combat the silly disinformation" that actually means "I invite you to call me a pedophile rapist." What a fucking hot take that is.

Oh my god, I'm shitting my pants from laughing so hard. This is some of the most pants on head exceptional legalese "gotcha" I think I've ever seen.

It's the age-old "only a racist would say they're not a racist!" trope!
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: ThonyTheThaigirl
Well, looks like we made the big time

1564526292180.png


Tried to archive it, but the site is being incredibly exceptional
 
They had the affidavits for a long time, they're just leaking them now because they're desperate to get any damaging information out about Vic.

Isn't it curious timing that Douchette is releasing these immediately after Vic announces his signing in NYC? It's using "victims" to perpetuate a narrative, and is wholly disingenuous.

But I mean, good on Greg for going the extra mile to demonstrate that the defendants totally aren't malicious at all

Doucette really is the anti-Nick.

Nick: releases new docs and deets as soon as he's allowed to do so.

Doucette: only releases docs he's had for months in order to maximize damage

That strategy is freaking disgusting in all honesty-- it outright trivializes the supposed experience of self-alleged victims as part of a practically political strategy, compared to just publicizing the truth you said would come out in the open at this point.

I'm going to keep saying it until everyone gets it: these people don't care about women, and they don't care about children.

So the twins affidavits are literally:

Adult invites other adults to his room after prior consensual meetings and kisses.

The adult women invited to the room make it clear they don’t want to have sex, so no sex is had. When asked to express whether or not they wanted a kiss (as they had just demonstrated their ability do voice their desires) they chose to not state they were not interested, and displayed no outward signs of disapproval.

They then left of their own accord and nothing further was ever pursued.

Is this supposed to be damning?

Innuendo, despite the fact that literally nobody is capable of outright saying that Vic sexually assaulted them. They have to play up kissing as sexual assault (and Hunt better not be trying to claim this as assault, 'cause it don't matter how old those girls were if you're going to claim that what they allege was sexual assault), but they're still saying that he, by himself, lets them go when they make it clear that they're not interested. In this case, they're trying to rely on a large age gap to gross out the judge/jury, even though everyone was an adult.



Incredibly, the twins have now gone from underage girls when Vic first met them, to 19 years of age and the incident not happening last year to prompt Moronica to come forward with her story; but in 2015.

So what happened last year Moronica that made you want to come forward with your story?

Could it be that Vic and Michelle Specht broke up and this is all part of the VA’s getting revenge on Vic for Michelle?

They could have just told us that he cheated on his fiancée and they would have done damage to his reputation and everyone would have been like, "yeah, that's pretty crappy of him to do".

Now it's just, "...but did he rape anyone?"

I'm trying so hard to keep up with this bullshit but my mind can't register the sheer amount of tardness without imploding in on itself like a fucking blackhole.

So...from my understanding...they are just outright saying the rumors about Vic's behaviors at cons are true, provide no actual evidence of them being factually true and then goes on to admit that if they are true that he pretty much just let him get away with it this whole entire time and did nothing about it if it was true, what??? Someone help me make sense of this, please.

They're all degenerates that don't care about people, let alone women and children, to the point that even as they cover their lies with more lies, they're willing to throw themselves on this sword because they don't know the implications of their own words and lack of action.

Better?
 
Creator of Dilbert. The left currently hates him because he (correctly) predicted Trump would win, simply from watching and analyzing Trumps skills at persuasion. They view him as an Alt-Right Nazi... a socially liberal vegan alt-right Nazi...

He's got some legitimately useful insights on how to view the world in terms of narratives, and most of his post-2016 time is spent analyzing the news in terms of "what movie are you watching, vs the movie the other side is watching?" Problem is he falls into the classic "only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail" trap: he'll interpret everything Trump does or says in terms of persuasion, when sometimes it's Trump being practical, or being defeated, or just being petty while sperging out.

I would love to see those streams if they are online.


He does 1-2 of them a day, usually in the mornings over coffee. Yesterday's was about getting called out for suggesting people use his app (for free) to get at-the-scene video from witnesses of the festival shooting, as a news gathering tool. Which is what ManJaw was giving him shit about, because the other use for that app is buying consultation time from experts. People were accusing him of trying to profit from a tragedy.

Which is kind a common theme for the entire KickVic squad: always assume the worst of people you don't like, and only give the benefit of the doubt to sworn allies.
 
They could have just told us that he cheated on his fiancée and they would have done damage to his reputation and everyone would have been like, "yeah, that's pretty crappy of him to do".

Now it's just, "...but did he rape anyone?"
I went from "yeah that was really shitty and cowardly to cheat on his fiance and he is pretty scummy for it and should have just broken it off" to "wow holy shit he actually dodge the crazy bullet and can no longer blame him"
 
Affidavits incoming, from the twins. Doucette is teasing them on twitter

View attachment 867136

View attachment 867125View attachment 867126View attachment 867127View attachment 867129

I'm just going to post this again since it's clear here that they were assaulting Norman Reedus back in 2013.


officertheresbeenanassault.png


I don't understand what the issue is with the "we're only 22 years old". Clint Eastwood's former wife was nearly 40 years younger then him.

Didn't we already here about these twins? What more could they possibly add?
Their accounts were only mentioned secondhand via Funimation and Vic.

This might be a problem considering that not only did they both live you La Choy, but one of them worked at the Tuttle Group for nearly a year.

Also assaulted, Greg? You sure about that, bud? Even if we grant what they say as true (which a judge won't at the TCPA as Nick has covered over and over), it doesn't sound like assault to me.

Because r.etards are throwing that word around because they "felt" like they were going to be harmed or "thought" that based on their feelings. This is what it all comes back to. "Feelings".

So the twins affidavits are literally:

Adult invites other adults to his room after prior consensual meetings and kisses.

The adult women invited to the room make it clear they don’t want to have sex, so no sex is had. When asked to express whether or not they wanted a kiss (as they had just demonstrated their ability do voice their desires) they chose to not state they were not interested, and displayed no outward signs of disapproval.

They then left of their own accord and nothing further was ever pursued.

Is this supposed to be damning?

What's supposed to be "damning" is the cupping of one of the twins' face and the kiss, which in their view was without consent. But I mean, was the Reedus picture without consent?

"But when multiple women are saying similar stories about him
especially several who worked with him or don't even know each other,
you know who's telling the truth."
:thinking:

Didn't they all know each other?

They do know each other. Tora is r.etarded.

I wonder if Tora even knows that BT defended Bill Cosby.
 
Last edited:
Wow. These are some special pleadings right here. The arguments are trash, and the affidavits barely help the defense.

A fun bit from McManus' affidavit:

View attachment 867388



Hmmm, isn't that the exact argument the Plaintiff was making, that BS rumors had been around for years, but it was only once the Defendants started tweeting, fueling investigations, and sourcing ANN articles, that the cons started cancelling?
:thinking:
Big-brained superlolyers, please respond!
Amanda_McManus2final1-700x858.jpg
 
I'm just going to post this again since it's clear here that they were assaulting Norman Reedus back in 2013.


View attachment 867668
He looks legitimately uncaring in this photo. I'm pretty sure even if you removed the glasses, he'd still look just as miserable.
Any passerby with the mindset of those two bitches would automatically believe they were assaulting him because look at him, he LOOKS like he clearly doesn't want it so that means he actually didn't and felt uncomfortable. Therefore, by their own definitions, they sexually assaulted him. Norman Reedus, what a brave man you are. What a brave survivor. You are a victim and I support you.

Pffft, hahaha!!
 

Rial named someone who would be able to testify to her allegation, and said person has stated that 1) he cannot, 2) he was not made aware of this incident, and 3) if he did remember/was made aware of this incident, he wouldn't have invited them together on future occasions,

At minimum, it means that Rial didn't even do the legwork of contacting the man she dragged into this lawsuit in order to jog his memory/"jog his memory". It's telling that she didn't bother to do such a thing.
 
Creator of Dilbert. The left currently hates him because he (correctly) predicted Trump would win, simply from watching and analyzing Trumps skills at persuasion. They view him as an Alt-Right Nazi... a socially liberal vegan alt-right Nazi...
LITERALLY HITLER.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XYZpdq
Back