- Joined
- Apr 13, 2019
Who else thinks they also might be trying to get Vic recognized as a public figure by running this article?If you ever needed proof that the defendants are now truly afraid of how this is turning out, this is it. This article is going to be much worse for the defendants than anything else they have done up to this point. How do they plan to argue Vic was libel-proof and the defendant's accounts weren't causing him damage when the accusations are front and center in a news article? How do they plan to claim they never intended to damage his career when they are willing participants in a fairly obvious hit piece? How in the world did they think this was a good idea?
I can't believe anyone is actually this stupid.