Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

[Marjan Šiklić]

http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/OLD-ENGLISH/2005-05/1116407949

I see. It would be interesting to know why.

Oh fucking well look... I provided fucking evidence and you ignored it! /QUOTE]
and here you get weaselly again. most of your posts aren't even read by me, since you're, like, insane. so i didn't ignore it, just didn't see it.

And? How does that make the number of people getting married zero, as you claimed?

you are an idiot.

 

[Sammy]

i could have money if i worked, but it would go nowhere.

You could contribute to society, make yourself more attractive to women as a provider and contributor, improve your standard of living. Maybe you don't agree with all of modern society's practices, but isn't it more honorable to try and change it as you see fit while contributing to it instead of sitting around, complaining how the system is not as you would like it to be, but still taking handouts from the very societal system you libel?

 

[TM Ambrose]

cat - interesting. there is constant battle to bring it back. but i predicted that the liberals there will not allow this.

Wikipedia has certain standards to uphold. One of those standards is not letting things that aren't actually a thing on their page. If i heard involuntary celabicy i immediatly think of a 28 year old nobody bitching about not being able to get laid, and having to use the internet to cope with it. Trust me, even non-liberals don't care if you get china or not. In fact convservatives are against welfare and you've been promoting welfare girlfriends. So they'd probably just fucking hang you.

 

[CatParty]

i would, if i knew how.

join their conversation!
http://8ch.net/gamergate/

 

[Holy wait what?]

it takes feminism time to destroy a society. first it had to destroy the people. west didn't have its generation of sluts until 1960.

Prove it.

Not with opinions, with evidence.

Can't do it, can you? You've got nothing and you know it... that's why you insist so many here are insane, so you can convince yourself that you're right. It's pretty fucking pathetic, to be honest.

make arguments, not senseless claims

*Irony meter explodes*

 

[TM Ambrose]

Still can't use quotes.

 

[SpessCaptain]

You could contribute to society, make yourself more attractive to women as a provider and contributor, improve your standard of living. Maybe you don't agree with all of modern society's practices, but isn't it more honorable to try and change it as you see fit while contributing to it instead of sitting around, complaining how the system is not as you would like it to be, but still taking handouts from the very societal system you libel?

But he won't because he's got money flooding in for him to use crack - all we can hope is that his only contribution to society is a thousand-paged thread on the kiwi forums.

Because no one takes his blog seriously they'll render into dust.

This is your shitty legacy Holden.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

@Holden still hasn't been able to state what a relationship is in his own words...

a romantic relationship - a relationship between two people, usually of the opposite sex, based on affection, romance/romantic love and sexual desire

 

[Holy wait what?]

you are an idiot.

Same post as you fuck up the tags...

And you did claim that people do not get married now... numbers are now rising in the UK, so what does that say about your claim that modern men aren't getting married now?

Oh yeah... destroys it.

 

[CatParty]

@Holden pro-GamerGate is anti-feminist and anti-GamerGate is lead by the feminist evil mastermind Anita Sarkeesian. you will be in very good company

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

You could contribute to society, make yourself more attractive to women as a provider and contributor

well, that's the thing. this is bs that last applied in 1955. if you are so certain of this guarantee it. pay me a guarantee. i mean, all i've ever seen says this is nonsense and that this won't make me attractive to women.

again, do you think women should marry men they've never seen based on their income and the fact that they're not abusive? if not, why not? what else is necessary? hint - seduction.

Same post as you fuck up the tags...

And you did claim that people do not get married now...

they marry formally, but it's just a front for whoring of the "wives". as i said many times. now go away, asptard.

Prove it.

Not with opinions, with evidence.

I have proven it. the un illegitimacy rates.

 

[Cuck Norris]

they marry formally, but it's just a front for whoring of the "wives". as i said many times. now go away, asptard.

I see you've run out of "arguments" and are back to ad hominem again.

 

[Holy wait what?]

a romantic relationship - a relationship between two people, usually of the opposite sex, based on affection, romance/romantic love and sexual desire

You are on record stating that romance is seduction... and relationships do not require sexual desire.

And you didn't describe what a RELATIONSHIP is... you only described a subset of them.

 

[SpessCaptain]

You are on record stating that romance is seduction... and relationships do not require sexual desire.

And you didn't describe what a RELATIONSHIP is... you only described a subset of them.

It looks like he scrubbed the explaination this from a dictionary, Holden's father must of been a dictionary. Holden, what is really a romantic relationship?

 

[Holy wait what?]

again, do you think men should marry women they've never seen based on their income and the fact that they're not abusive? if not, why not? what else is necessary? hint - seduction.

Well? You've already said maybe to that, so you admit there is something else FOR YOU!

they marry formally, but it's just a front for whoring of the "wives". as i said many times. now go away, asptard.

Prove it... with evidence.

I have proven it. the un illegitimacy rates.

Proven what? Go on, what does it prove other than more children are born out of wedlock?

Oh, and did you forget that there are more people now, so of course the number will have risen. Surely I don't need to remind you of your own come back from less than an hour ago?!?

:edit: And before you try to say illegitimate children are proof of anything, remember one thing... in the past hundred years or so, women who were pregnant but unmarried were often packed off to "stay with relatives" for 9 months or so, and had a new "brother or sister" when they came back.

Some of the rise is from people no longer giving a shit if the parents were married or not... keep that in mind before you spew garbage around.

It looks like he scrubbed the explaination this from a dictionary, Holden's father must of been a dictionary. Holden, what is really a romantic relationship?

He really doesn't get the fact that he's just regurgitating other people's descriptions... and some of them will be the Liberal Western Women who he claims cannot understand it.

Self spanking FTW.

 

[Luna]

they marry formally, but it's just a front for whoring of the "wives". as i said many times. now go away, asptard.

Why don't you leave your slum? There's more to life than jerking off to elliot rodger and smoking meth.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Well? You've already said maybe to that, so you admit there is something else FOR YOU!

again, you can't even read. i said that i'd never do it in a modern society. in a sane one, extremely likely.

Prove it... with evidence.

you prove me that it isn't so. oh, wait, you can't?

 

[Dr. Meme]

@Holden what is it you fear my child. what are you running from.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

You are on record stating that romance is seduction.

where? i want to see the exact context. i mean, according to you i am on record for saying i'm a rapist as well. you are an insane person.

 

[CatParty]

again, you can't even read. i said that i'd never do it in a modern society. in a sane one, extremely likely.


you prove me that it isn't so. oh, wait, you can't?

did you look into the gamergate info i posted? they are fighting the feminists too!