Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I haven't read his entire post but that's not what I told her. The crux of the story, however, is that it is completely irrelevant what I told her, since her changes of mind, as confessed by her about a month later (when we were already in a relationship) were fake, designed to mess with me, and had absolutely nothing to do with anything I was saying. I do remember now that I wrote about entering a relationship with her with her doing this, but I seemed to forgot to emphasize that I didn't know that she did this on purpose at the time (sadly, even if I knew I'd still date her).

As for another girl I had sex some months later, I admit I did try to blackmail her at first but the moment she asked for things to give me sex and I accepted this it stopped being blackmail.

I am not saying this to try and justify myself. I don't think like you. Had I really blackmailed them or raped them I'd proudly proclaim so here. Some skank's consent is nothing. I don't think like a regular brainwashed joe. But that alone might be a good indication that I am telling the truth about these cases.
You sound like a mother raping meth addict here @Holden. No joke, lay off the meth. And rape.

Holden said:
I don't think
Oh we know.
 
So you complain about people not understanding or questioning your definition of a romantic relationship while you say you'd proudly boast about raping or blackmailing a girl into sex. And you wonder why women who want committed relationships aren't giving you the time of day? Hell apparently you consider me one of the exceptions and after talking to you for 5 minutes I already wanna boot you in the bollocks so hard they fly out of your eye sockets.
 
also, holy, as stated above - The crux of the story, however, is that it is completely irrelevant what I told her, since her changes of mind, as confessed by her about a month later (when we were already in a relationship) were fake, designed to mess with me, and had absolutely nothing to do with anything I was saying. I do remember now that I wrote about entering a relationship with her with her doing this, but I seemed to forgot to emphasize that I didn't know that she did this on purpose at the time (sadly, even if I knew I'd still date her).

So you complain about people not understanding or questioning your definition of a romantic relationship while you say you'd proudly blast about raping or blackmailing a girl into sex.
Yes. How is this connected? One is basic understanding of some concept, other is my views about western skanks.

And you wonder why women who want committed relationships aren't giving you the time of day?
That's not what I wonder at all. I never met any such women.
 
also, holy, as stated above - The crux of the story, however, is that it is completely irrelevant what I told her, since her changes of mind, as confessed by her about a month later (when we were already in a relationship) were fake, designed to mess with me, and had absolutely nothing to do with anything I was saying. I do remember now that I wrote about entering a relationship with her with her doing this, but I seemed to forgot to emphasize that I didn't know that she did this on purpose at the time (sadly, even if I knew I'd still date her).
IT DOESNT MATTER BECAUSE YOU THOUGHT IT WAS REAL AT THE TIME.
 
holy- yes, really. i said it will be strange. never that it will be uncomfortable. if you can't tell the truth don't even try to post about my life.
Paraphrasing... I love it.

Oh, and @Holden? DON'T YOU EVER FUCKING DARE COMPLAIN ABOUT PEOPLE NOT TELLING THE TRUTH WHEN YOU THROW THE SHIT ABOUT OTHERS AROUND, YOU HYPOCRITICAL SACK OF SHIT!

The crux of the story

... is that you intended to force her into changing her mind and doing something against her will. Excuses for it are just excuses and simply mean you are aware of what you did and are trying to get out of admitting what you did.

Which was blackmail someone into sex, AS YOU FUCKING WELL ADMIT!
 
what paraphrasing? you said i claimed i'd be uncomfortable. but the screencap you so graciously provided says otherwise. you're a lying jackass who showed he is lying.
In some contexts, saying that something is strange is the very same thing as saying that something is making you uncomfortable... you say you speak English very well, yet you make errors like that.

Here's the thing as well, I didn't intend to give a 100% accurate account, just get the gist of things across... which is where paraphrasing come into it. The fact that there is one very minor quibble changes absolutely nothing about it, but you are trying to use it to discount the entire thing. It's intellectually dishonest...

In fact... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_fallacy

Yep... a logical fallacy you hadn't been called out on before...
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
We seem to be having an effect on @Holden, after only 940 or so pages. The subject has started to regurgitate our arguments, although he himself remains utterly devoid of logic. The subject also has started to engage more, instead of simply spouting his Fuckbotic tripe. Subject has not yet advanced to the point where he will answer all questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentprincess
"I'll find it strange to do it with condoms" if that doesn't mean you were uncomfortable with them, then what DOES it mean?
It means he's desperately searching for anything he can latch onto in an attempt to make what happened be different... it's a guilty mind trying to avoid admitting it's guilty but knowing it's a futile endeavour.

Doesn't stop it trying though.

:edit: It's worth noting that he's trying hard to convince us he didn't try to blackmail someone into sex... while at the top of this very page is a post by him where he says...

As for another girl I had sex some months later, I admit I did try to blackmail her at first
So all his protests about him not trying to blackmail someone into sex is a waste of time since he's already admitted to trying.

Had I really blackmailed them or raped them I'd proudly proclaim so here.
Your attempts to convince us otherwise make you out to be a liar... funny that.

:edit again: Stop Word Lawyering...
 
Last edited:
@Holden

Go_the_fuck_to_sleep.jpg
 
Yes...I don't know why anyone would say "I'll find it strange to do it with condoms" unless they were attempting to not use condoms during sex. If the girl wasn't on the pill,having unprotected sex would be a dangerous game as she would be risking getting pregnant.

I can completely understand why she changed her mind. Posting her pictures on a blog was a dick thing to do.
 
Yes...I don't know why anyone would say "I'll find it strange to do it with condoms" unless they were attempting to not use condoms during sex. If the girl wasn't on the pill,having unprotected sex would be a dangerous game as she would be risking getting pregnant.

I can completely understand why she changed her mind. Posting her pictures on a blog was a dick thing to do.
But he never treated any woman badly, he was a true gentleman and treated them with respect only... honest.

Someone buy the fucker a dictionary... he fucking well needs one badly.
 
Flossman looks cute. He's certainly got a better fashion sense than you.

@flossman , if that's you, I happen to have friends from Milwaukee. We should all roll when I finally meet up with them.

Well Mr. Internet Detective, dox me now. Here's a hint: I'm friends with @flossman on Facebook.

flossman continues to see like a pretty cool dude who I would happily share a drink with.

Damn, @flossman is a fly motherfucker.
Hey @Holden, can you drop some more dox on me? It seems to be having terrible effects.
 
Yes...I don't know why anyone would say "I'll find it strange to do it with condoms"
because it would feel strange. of course i was going to use them. why are we discussing this? i already explained it wasn't the reason, as admitted by her. what will you discuss next? why poles attacked the gleiwitz station in 1939?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back