Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Another in a series of stellar examples of why we need to reopen mental institutions and warehouse these lobotomites.

When you have supposed lawyers openly spewing such insanity, you have to conclude that civilization is in serious danger as an ongoing concern. The fact that it's exceptionals on twitter does not nullify the reality that said exceptional was presented, somehow, with a law degree and WILL ultimately fuck up someone's life. Extrapolate that across the various important pillars of civilization (because he sure as fuck isn't an anomoly) and the problem is readily apparent.

Society is too fucked for asylums to come back. The smarter crazies would just "blend in" better or start petitioning about "human rights violations", that end up making said asylums even more pointless somehow.
 
Ok hope I did this right, here is someone arguing how Monica said she was sexually harassed in her Affidavit, another person asking for citations to prove that and the guy who claimed sexual assault proving that according to his definition Monica technically didn't describe sexual assault.

As is customary the guy decided not to continue the discussion when he realized he was wrong.

Edit. Not sure how I screwed up the archive but I kinda did, link to the thread as well here Hopefully I did not screw this as well.
Annotation 2019-08-18 202902.png
Yeah this guys a huge douche bag. I came across his github page the other day and it says he worked at Rogers media (one of the biggest Media companies in Canada). He's trying to put together a website compiling threadnought shit.

I have not seen him posting about Vic before the last few weeks. Maybe he will STFU if he actually looks into it or run out of steam (not likely, his hot takes sound like he could be Shane's sockpuppet ffs). IDK if it is worth it to archive his mediocre takes on the topic, he just parrot's these law twitter dips.

At first, I discounted it as the ravings of a lunatic because I figured if his markdown was reflective of the rest of his intellectual prowess there's no way he worked at one of the largest media companies in Canada. However, when I looked at his linkedin I saw he was a middle management type and it reminded of the kind of lukewarm buckets that appear to be able to thrive in those spots.

 
Last edited:
I was pretty amused by a thread a friend of mine brought to my attention, where Abel lifted his mutant head long enough to spout some nonsense and promptly got BTFO'd and called out for being mentally unfit.

Just to see the queue of people lining up to defend a convicted-yet-not (because of mental illness) person, was absolutely astounding. This is what KV is built on, they are willing to defend actually convicted felons and pedophiles, while trying to attack innocent people and accuse them of the very things that they're defending.

It's sobering to watch, because knowing that these people exist without seemingly any self-awareness is scary, when you think these folks are teachers/lawyers.
And that, my fellow short birdlike friend, is why God created Thorazine, small rooms and door locks.
GenericReviewerDraco said:
The smarter crazies would just "blend in" better or start petitioning about "human rights violations", that end up making said asylums even more pointless somehow.
Guess who closed the asylums to begin with.
 
Last edited:
And that, my fellow short birdlike friend, is why God created Thorazine, small rooms and door locks.

Oh I forgot the funniest part about that too..

Abel tried to say that if he being mentally unfit for trial means he should keep his mouth shut about legal proceedings, then trans folks shouldn't speak because body dysphoria is a mental illness, and they're unfit for trial too.

I guess he's auditioning to be Yaniv's defense attorney. :story:
 
This ain't an anime, it's a damn soap opera.
Let's see...
- Homely chicks in need of Vic dick: Check
- Lying women: Check
- A lover scorned by the womanizer: Check
- A psycho: Multiple checks
- Secret schemes: The daily gayops say check
- Men protecting women: "Check"
- A womanizer: Check
- Rival factions between the show's onlookers: Check
- Legal battles in the plot: Check

If only this case was truly serious in the narrow aspect.
 
I really wish they'd put some effort into their lies, it's actually boring how quickly they get blown up and it leaves very little to chew on. Truly this is the filler part of the series.
All the good lies have been debunked, including vic even being the person han was referring to.
 
Yeah this guys a huge douche bag. I came across his github page the other day and it says he worked with Rogers media (one of the biggest Media companies in Canada). He seems to be trying to put together a website compiling threadnought shit.

I have not seen him posting about this before the last few weeks. Maybe he will STFU if he actually looks into it or run out of steam (not likely, his takes sound like he may be Shanes sock account and he has seasoned accounts).

IDK if it is worth archive his mediocre takes on the topic, he just parrot's these law twitter dips, but I have been unable archive anything at the sites kiwi's are using (or even look at archived stuff). I'm defuinuitely not blocked though, it just always times out. I do have screenshots though.

At first I discounted it as the ravings of a lunatic because I figured if his markdown was reflective of the rest of his coding prowess there's no way he worked at one of the largest media companies in Canada.

However, when I looked at his linkedin I saw he was a middle management type and it reminded of the kind of buckets that appear to be able to thrive in those spots (Shame).


[Edited for grammar]
The thing I found funny was how that thread basically shows that even taking Monica words as truth, her Affidavit doesn't prove Vic committed any sexual harassment, let alone sexual assault.

Even discounting how Stan called her Affidavit a lie, the affidavit, even if it was true, is worthless.
 
I was pretty amused by a thread a friend of mine brought to my attention, where Abel lifted his mutant head long enough to spout some nonsense and promptly got BTFO'd and called out for being mentally unfit.

Just to see the queue of people lining up to defend a convicted-yet-not (because of mental illness) person, was absolutely astounding. This is what KV is built on, they are willing to defend actually convicted felons and pedophiles, while trying to attack innocent people and accuse them of the very things that they're defending.

It's sobering to watch, because knowing that these people exist without seemingly any self-awareness is scary, when you think these folks are teachers/lawyers.

Even more amazing is that I've seen them recently idolizing Ron Toye and his actions as a fiance in apparently defending Monica rather than Vic's admitted infidelity as a fiance. If that's your barometer on the validity of a defamation case, I'm sorry but you've lost the plot, especially as a lawyer. Vic fucked up big time and I think we all recognize that. That happens. People can get better, especially when they admit to their mistakes and make the effort to do better. Vic is and has been, that much is clear to me as an outsider. Ron and Monica, on the other hand, have made NO effort EVER to make things right. They never wanted things to be right. They never wanted the truth to come out, as evidenced by their complete lack of anything substantive produced during discovery, including their own fucking tweets!!! They just wanted Vic to cower in shame, fading away into the darkness, that much is clear. To pretend like the complete disregard for the life of another man is somehow morally superior to admitted infidelity with attempts to make right is absolutely fucking insane. I tend to lean toward not judging the moral character of lawyers who have the duty of zealously representing and defending some of the worst people out there, but these twitter lawyers have over and over shown that they lack both maturity and moral character.
 
The thing I found funny was how that thread basically shows that even taking Monica words as truth, her Affidavit doesn't prove Vic committed any sexual harassment, let alone sexual assault.

Even discounting how Stan called her Affidavit a lie, the affidavit, even if it was true, is worthless.
"He made out with me and I went along with it and he dry humped me at best and looking back on it now I was really uncomfortable and I decided that I didn't like it. Clearly he raped me despite no actual vaginal penetration going on."
Kek.
:story:
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: P5Fever
Anyone else notice it is never the victims coming forward like miss lijima here.
Its always some random sped coming forward and speaking about how the person should have felt.

"She looked uncomfortable, I think she didnt like it, Vic was kissing these girls and they hated it"

Pathetic.
its all they have. vic never raped them, but they did see someone interact with vic so thats what they need to run with. that or "my cousins brothers roommates dogs groomers brothers wife said vic raped them".

gotta double down on #believeallwamyns
 
Saw this going around an hour ago. Debunked in seconds.

From best selling author TL Reeve comes a tale you won't believe!
View attachment 898095

The Twitter version:
View attachment 898074

View attachment 898090
View attachment 898089
http://archive.fo/IV8Fk

Reality:


View attachment 898105
https://archive.fo/Nzpvk

She doesn't even look uncomfortable, she looks like she's about to burst into laughter. But how unsurprising they took an awkward looking snapshot from an odd angle in the middle of a video where she's SUPER HAPPY and made up a fake story. Just keep sinking your credibility, guys.

I honestly don't believe Vic kissed Monica or threw her on the bed at all. His stories deny it happened, he always considered her a friend, not a lover, and Stan doesn't remember anything like what Monica described, not even a consensual encounter he interrupted. She made it up.
 
I honestly don't believe Vic kissed Monica or threw her on the bed at all. His stories deny it happened, he always considered her a friend, not a lover, and Stan doesn't remember anything like what Monica described, not even a consensual encounter he interrupted. She made it up.

It should have been obvious from the minute that particular event wasn't reported to Denbow as a part of the HR investigation. Who the fuck complains about possible sexual innuendo from someone eating a jellybean, but forgets to mention the time that they were almost raped?
 
She ended up appreciating the role and did some cons tho if I recall?

That's how I remember it all evolving.
The first couple of cons and brushes with fandom, (in the mid 90s'), never would have painted a picture of how things would turn out over time.
I guess it's a nice cautionary tale about how one or two less than stellar examples of guest behavior, not being the whole picture of who they are...
 
"He made out with me and I went along with it and he dry humped me at best and looking back on it now I was really uncomfortable and I decided that I didn't like it. Clearly he raped me despite no actual vaginal penetration going on."
Kek.
:story:
It may be worse than that, according to the link in that Twitter conversation the general definition of sexual assault would require that Monica had told or indicated Vic she was uncomfortable with the kiss, the actions that require specific clear consent are sexual contact like grabbing her ass or tits.

According to Monica's own words Vic did nothing that could be considered sexual harassment. That is how bad the thing is.
 
Back