Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

"If they choose to sue me in North Carolina, they'll have to file it in Durham County to be heard in front of judges I see every day"

I'm not seeing the plus to him from this. So they know he's an insufferable cunt in person and not just by reputation. Okay. . .umm. . .whatever?

The obvious minus to suing him is he's a complete loser and you'd have to stand in line behind the IRS and student loans and your unsecured debt would be virtually worthless under those circumstances. There is no point suing him because he is an utter failure with no money.
 
Shane (Non-Shoeater) still was / probably is a assblasted guy who did worship Monty Oum quite too much as Garm pointed out, but he and Zuelch were pretty right about the "Highschool / Elitist Clique" shenanigans that Cuck Teeth engaged in similar to Failmation.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Oh yeah, no doubts about it. Even if I tend to agree with his letter, I still see him as a wailing widow pissed at his husband peers for not mourning him as he does.

No one wants to be him, the autobiography he wrote paints his life as a shithole, I feel sorry for his kids

Hell, it wouldn't be far fetched to think he'd hit on Monty were both of them gay.
 
Last edited:
Quite a few people, including myself speculated that he might be the Igor character in all of this. All things considered, I still find it quite possible that he is either igor or renfield. Maybe even someone from TFS, who knows. They love sucking off Sabat for some VA work at Funi.

I always thought he was more of a fence sitter at the beginning and got dragged into this mess by Xavier. But him being a conspirator is becoming the reality after his alliance with mba.


Rhyme hasn't said anything about the trial I think. Not sure if he interacted with either side on twitter either. However, after all these people came out and just started spewing lies and condemning people without a trial, I've lost hope in the DBtuber scene.

I'm honestly glad that rhyme has been quiet about the situation but knowing he's from California I wouldn't be surprised that he may be left leaning.


When was this? Before or after MBA appeared on Nick's show?

That was during the deposition saga of season 2 of Vickicksback.
 
Last edited:
Never heard of it. Enlighten me

Okay.

Once upon a time, there was an animator named Richard Williams.
: He's said to be one of the great animation directors, having done the Chuck Jones-produced 'Christmas Carol', that trippy 'Raggedy Ann and Andy' film, and probably his biggest accomplishment, the animation for 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit'. Yet before all of that, he started production on 'The Thief and the Cobbler' in 1964. It was released in 1993. What the hell happened all that time? Apparently, the film was independently funded and Williams went on and on saying that this was going to be his masterpiece. Because of this, the film took years and years of perfecting and financing to finally get it finished. In fact, one of the actors died before the film even got released! Vincent Price recorded his dialogue over twenty years before it ever saw the light of day. And as of now, it continues to be the longest time it's ever taken to complete an animated picture. Because this turkey was taking so long, the film was bought by the Completion Bond Company and kicked Williams off the project, having it released by Miramax and putting together their own half-assed cut that is still considered to be the cum-bucket of a dick cock.

And there's this thing called "The Recobbled Cut".
This uses unfinished animation and storyboards to tell the version that Richard Williams always wanted to see. And let me tell you, it’s a lot better. There’s no Matthew Broderick or Jonathan Winters, no shitty-ass songs and virtually no dialogue from the main characters, which is actually pretty unique. Because of this, most of the story’s told strictly through the animation, which—while some people may see as an acquired taste—is still pretty spectacular. There’s so much more expression in just the movements of the character than there is with that horrible inner monologue. It knows what it wants to be: a surreal, artistic, practically silent movie, unlike the Miramax cut, which tries so hard to appeal to everyone that it appeals to no one. And while I can’t say the Recobbled Cut is a fantastic movie, it’s certainly more impressive and much more entertaining. It’s worth checking out for any fan of animation. If you just type in “Thief and the Cobbler Recobbled Cut” on Google or Youtube, you’ll come across it eventually. Check it out and see some really great animation.
 
According to the HH interview with Erica, Texas is a mandatory reporting state, which includes constaff. That would mean that lots of these stories are saying they witnessed crimes related to Vic and then neglected to report it...while being mandated reporters.

Texas gets more right than it does wrong, this is one. If you witness a crime and fail to report it, or hear of plans for a crime and fail to report it you can be charged as an accessory after the fact.
 
I'm not seeing the plus to him from this. So they know he's an insufferable cunt in person and not just by reputation. Okay. . .umm. . .whatever?

The obvious minus to suing him is he's a complete loser and you'd have to stand in line behind the IRS and student loans and your unsecured debt would be virtually worthless under those circumstances. There is no point suing him because he is an utter failure with no money.

If he warranted being hated, someone could sue him just to keep dragging him into court about his finances. But that that point you're just paying your own lawyer a bunch of money just to make Greg's life just slightly more miserable than it already is.

A particularly vicious person might wonder how long he and his girlfriend have been living together, whether that has an implications under common law marriage, and whether or not that could be used to go after her assets. I doubt if it would be that easy, but at some point she'd probably jettison his worthless ass. I'm sure she could find some other useless loser that sits around and tweets all day that doesn't have trouble attached to him.

Even then it isn't worth it. I have a feeling that when the court starts ruling on things, people are going to start turning on law twitter. It's one thing to claim that there's a good chance the defendants could get out with their TCPA motions, but another thing to claim 100% certainty.

We all know how quickly and viciously the social justice crowd will turn on someone. In some ways they're worse than anything a lawyer could do. Fortunately for Greg it isn't like he has a job that they can go after and get him fired from and his oxygen-deprived brain seems impervious to criticism flung at him on Twitter. The same things that make Greg pointless to sue, might also make him impervious to the social justice mob.

He's such a loser that you can't really take him down a peg.
 
View attachment 907292

This is some kind of crazy. I think he is saying the "Vic wasn't recording so he wasn't technically hired."View attachment 907292
That's not how that works. They dont make you sign a contract 5 minutes before recording, they get you to sign a decent amount of time in advance (likely further in advance if you cant be local to sign it, so that mail time can be accounted for).

Hedge a bet here, possible vic signed the year before, did his work and was preemptively asked if he would continue working so they could have time to replace him if he declined. Well managed productions dont tend to let things slide until the last second.
 
You know, if the cliques could be identified, things would make a lot more sense. Only thing I've heard was that Arryn and Barbara are the ones pushing for the Blake/Yang shit in RWBY this past volume.

It really depends, but RWBY had more inner drama and shit in itself compared to RVB which far as I know had little if no drama.

The clique (In my guess) involves mostly RWBY individuals who still work with the actual company, opposed to ones like Kara and Arryn who both left the company since then but still send in voice work and attend RTX / Conventions where Cuck Teeth is involved in being in.

As I mentioned a long ass time of pages ago Kathleen Zuelch had a meltdown on Twitter (Supposedly Drunk, but I think she just snapped) chimping out at RT (Burnie, Miles and Kerry *I believe*, Ashley, etc.) after saying that Burnie Burns's then girlfriend (Now wife) slept her way to the top, and stating that she was being pushed out of the company despite being there far earlier than Ashley or Barbara before pissing napalm on the bridge.

Barbara's Tumblr post around the time says that Kathy engaged in Mean Girl shit and bullying tactics, wherein Kathy didn't like how unladylike Barb had been (Where she told Barb who either did a handjob or blowjob motion in a picture, IIRC) so they argued about it until someone broke it up...I think it was Burnie? It's been a while since that drama.

Notably, before this mess apparently Barb promoted her charity at a event and wasn't reprimanded but when Kathy did it at one she was reprimanded.

Tldr;So yeah, if there's clique stuff going on then Barbara can be identified as someone involved.

(I should point out that I'm not taking Kathleen's side or justifying her sperg out, but I can't say I'm surprised by the claims of Highschool shit by Newville.)
 
Last edited:
Everyone speculates that Casey wants out but they forget that Casey has his own exceptional filings. They're just overshadowed by the exceptionalnaught that is Lemoine's filings.

But Casey's not the one doing the filings anymore. The possibilities are that Casey has an out he's taking, or that they specifically brought Lemoine in for TCPA, and if it fails Casey's stuck holding the bag from here-on out.
 
We all know how quickly and viciously the social justice crowd will turn on someone. In some ways they're worse than anything a lawyer could do.

This just makes me think of what's his name and his medium article (Zero something?) and KV dogpiling him, while ISWV were much more cordial (even if they disagreed). These faggots just don't tolerate any opinion that deviates from their agenda. I mean I'm fairly libtard, but shit like this makes me question even that.
 
Screen of the leaked DM.
sabat leaked dm.jpg
 
What they're saying is that the contract was only for performance, and they weren't planning on asking him to perform during the term of the contract anyway. Therefore, they may have just let the contract lapse, since it isn't like there was any obligation either way. Just because you publicly announce you don't intend to use a contractor doesn't mean you actually have to fire them. You just...don't call them anymore.

I don't know if it's true or not, but it's entirely possible, and pretty much leaves them legally bulletproof. At least on the contract.

Edit: Quite honestly, I'm not sure why people care so much about this. He had a contract that ended before they even started recording the next season of RWBY; as stated above, it's likely RT could state that they didn't intend to use him, so there aren't any actual damages incurred. So even if there was a breach of contract, it likely didn't cause damages.

Thank you. I just found it odd that they would make a contract for part of the year where he wasn't going to record or do anything.

The contract isn't important in the grand scheme of things. The person in the picture tried to make the argument that Vic wasn't "on staff" when all this went down. I wasn't expecting a "pocket veto" of a contract to be their plan.
 
Just a heads up when you’re archiving stuff.
View attachment 906611
That explains a lot. Been seeing some of my Twitter replies disappearing, which is aggrivating when you're trying to archive replies to a specific post.

Speaks volumes, too: because when I'm winning an argument, I know I try to shut the other person up so nobody sees! lol
Anyone who might not think this is a bad thing, consider this. What if politicians decide to start hiding replies they do not like? Or businesses that do not like the negative experience a customer might have experienced? Feels like it is an attempt to give higher ups ability to silence those they do not like on a platform since it was stated politicians, in the us, cannot block people.
Oh yes. It will be abused. Let me get out my tiny violin for "Twitter: The Public Forum." Has anyone informed Trump yet?
:thinking:
genLock audience numbers from Toonami are available. Wild speculation need not be so wild anymore. Rank 34.

If I can get my fucking browser to work.


God damn.

Week 2. 12 place


Week 3. 12 place.

Not the worst numbers, I'll admit. But imagine getting edged-out by Lakefront Bargain Hunt. Can I get a whap-waah up in here?
It's one thing to hear an unofficial interview, it's quite another to see an affidavit that pretty much says lol no.
I wonder if @EriMin's "personal reason" might preclude her from bringing it up in affidavit. Granted, could just leave that part out and shoot down the OTHER 98% of his claims.
What they're saying is that the contract was only for performance, and they weren't planning on asking him to perform during the term of the contract anyway. Therefore, they may have just let the contract lapse, since it isn't like there was any obligation either way. Just because you publicly announce you don't intend to use a contractor doesn't mean you actually have to fire them. You just...don't call them anymore.

I don't know if it's true or not, but it's entirely possible, and pretty much leaves them legally bulletproof. At least on the contract.

Edit: Quite honestly, I'm not sure why people care so much about this. He had a contract that ended before they even started recording the next season of RWBY; as stated above, it's likely RT could state that they didn't intend to use him, so there aren't any actual damages incurred. So even if there was a breach of contract, it likely didn't cause damages.
I think they're mixing up/conflating the defendants and the causes of action. For example: Funi cannot interfere with its own contract. They can breach it, though that's not a claim in this case (and they better be super careful not to admit to that in court.) But they CAN defame vic. And the other defendants absolutely can interfere with his contract with their own defamation. (And it certainly seems that they did, since Funi felt the need to open their mouths and tie vic to "harassment" while publicly firing him.

AND FOR THE CHEAP SEATS ALL THE WAY IN BACK (looking at you, KickVic): nobody is faulting Funi for firing their employee in an at-will state

Funi not interfering with its own contract should save them from that one charge, but nothing else.

Again, not a lawyer. But do I have this all about right?

EDIT:
Screen of the leaked DM.
View attachment 907442
"the entire DBZ cast"? As far as I'm aware, it's him, Nth Bulma, and a few others, right? Does he not realize that more people than that work on DBZ? Or am I missing some additional drama here?
 
Last edited:
Back