Red Wizard
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
I think there was 2 or 3 tweets altogether. I think they're confusing him and Ron.
Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.
- Thread starter 5t3n0g0ph3r
- Start date
I think there was 2 or 3 tweets altogether. I think they're confusing him and Ron.
Imperial Agent
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
quickthrowaway
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2019
How in the fuck is filing your TCPA on the day of the extended deadline "timely"?
AcSK1LLies
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
Maybe someone should inform Mein Kough of what the meaning of deadline is?
- Joined
- May 8, 2019
So basically, "the TCPA doesn't say we can't continue to supplement material after the deadline, thus we should be allowed to do it."
- Joined
- May 18, 2019
>Gets pulled over for going 40 over the speed limit.
>You see officer, it says the speed limit is 50, not that I cant go 90.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Even if Vic is declared some kind of public figure, MoRon are still nailed on actual malice, anyway.
Ron is on record believing everything on PULL without verification. Reckless disregard for the truth.
Monica says Vic assaulted. Vic says he did not assault her. According to TCPA, where evidence is ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Vic's story is considered the more credible one. And since Vic's story is considered true (for the TCPA), it means Monica's is false, which also means she has knowledge of the falsity (for purposes of the TCPA).
Ron is on record believing everything on PULL without verification. Reckless disregard for the truth.
Monica says Vic assaulted. Vic says he did not assault her. According to TCPA, where evidence is ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Vic's story is considered the more credible one. And since Vic's story is considered true (for the TCPA), it means Monica's is false, which also means she has knowledge of the falsity (for purposes of the TCPA).
Red Wizard
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
IMO the only issue I can find in this trash heap is the issue concerning supplemental filings.
On one hand, BHBH contends that because there is a strict deadline, that supplemental filings should not be allowed, since that would defeat the purpose of a strict deadline.
On the other hand, Lemwhaaa???? argues that because the statute doesn't mention supplementals, that they should be allowed all the normal stuff you're allowed to do, including supplement.
Watching Racket's stream, he mentions that as long as it only involved two parties, Vic and Monica, simply stating the falsity of the accusation with clear and specific evidence (stating that the specific events didn't take place) is enough to satisfy the TCPA's need for a prima facie showing, AND it also satisfies the malice condition.
On one hand, BHBH contends that because there is a strict deadline, that supplemental filings should not be allowed, since that would defeat the purpose of a strict deadline.
On the other hand, Lemwhaaa???? argues that because the statute doesn't mention supplementals, that they should be allowed all the normal stuff you're allowed to do, including supplement.
Watching Racket's stream, he mentions that as long as it only involved two parties, Vic and Monica, simply stating the falsity of the accusation with clear and specific evidence (stating that the specific events didn't take place) is enough to satisfy the TCPA's need for a prima facie showing, AND it also satisfies the malice condition.
Last edited by a moderator:
MrRavellon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
- Mr Jadolf claims that he can supplement his motion past the deadline because it was never ruled that he can't. He conveniently fails to mention that it was never ruled that he can do so either.
- He keeps saying that the hearing can be heard up to 4 months after the motion is filed. He conveniently fails to mention that this is only the case when it was requested of the court to allow discovery as part of TCPA and the request was granted.
Otherwise the limit is 90 days, and that's with extension. Without extension the limit is 60 days.
And that's for hearing. - Mr Jadolf does not address Ty's argument at all, because Ty attacked Jadolf's and Funi's supplementary filings based on the deadline to file TCPA, not based on the deadline of when the hearing on TCPA must be set.
- Mr Jadolf essentially argues to the judge that he is allowed to file supplements to the motions this judge must hold hearings on up to the day of the hearing, making the life of said judge much more difficult if you consider the fact that if Chupp allows it this time he will have to allow it forever from now on, for everyone.
I don't think trying to make judge's life more difficult is a good plan. I think it's an awful plan. - Mr Jadolf's argument is constructed in a way as to suggest Ty's arguing the supplementation of TCPA motion should not be allowed.
Ty's argument being that supplementation of TCPA motion must be done within the deadline for filing that motion necessarily implies that Ty is of the opinion that supplementation of TCPA motion should be allowed.
Mr Jadolf's fight against a strawman is somewhat entertaining but I doubt Chupp will be very impressed by it.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2019
Why are they still harping on the twins story so much?
Also, Lemon Fuhrer, Vic did say that they were in the hotel room and that he asked for sex. Unbelievable that this shit is actually being considered an offense. And is Vic even suing for what the twins said about him, or for what Monica said?
Also, Lemon Fuhrer, Vic did say that they were in the hotel room and that he asked for sex. Unbelievable that this shit is actually being considered an offense. And is Vic even suing for what the twins said about him, or for what Monica said?
MrRavellon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
Twins part of the filing is irrelevant. It's a transparent attempt to prejudice the judge.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Do Lemonhead’s filings make anybody else’s head hurt? They feel like they are arrogantly lecturing the Judge.
It seemingly works for the Washington Post, sadly...
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
The twins haven't made any public statements as far as I know, and court documents are protected against defamation.
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2019
Immediately A 2 is bullshit unless Lemonfuhrer means they planned to engage in only receiving Vic’s discovery he should fucking realize there’s still a pending motion to compel BECAUSE these fuckwits played discovery games and still haven’t provided jack shit of what was requested in their interrogatories.
Is this guy an idiot or does he think Chupp is a playful little puppet? “In the legion of decision over 370 not one has ever determined that a movant cannot amend or supplement a timely filed motion to dismiss”
That would be because not one had had a supplementary challenge and I can bet all of those 370 have never attempted supplement past the deadlines in the first place.
What a panicked little shit, trying to fuck up the courts time and dockets with unnecessary research.
You’re gonna get dunked on Lemonfuhrer, you better hope your clients can afford that appeal and that conflict of interest doesn’t result in you getting paid ZERO and face disbarment.
The little shit is actually trying to retroactively apply the changes made earlier this year to the TCPA... this guy is a fucking clown.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2019
Because he's a TCPA expert doncha know. Allegedly. He'll even tell you so!
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2019
That'll go well for them. It certainly went well for Kevin Landau.
E
ES 195
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Mein Kough could be an expert at this point considering most people learn from their mistakes and failing every TCPA you've done is quite a lot of them.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
He’s so much of an expert that he has failed to convince a Judge in every case he’s brought. I mean I know failure is educational and all, but I don’t think I really want to be paying somebody to learn in that way.