- Joined
- Jun 17, 2018
They’re unfunny fat libtards, but that’s pretty much it.What does everyone have against TFS?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They’re unfunny fat libtards, but that’s pretty much it.What does everyone have against TFS?
I bet Sabat would fuck the girls and have them use whatever voice they were going for and just picked the one that made him cum the hardest.
The only one I don't like is the Goku actor. Being soft spoken & high pitched is fine for Gohan, but not for Goku.I dunno, maybe it's because i've watched them for years, but when it comes to pure voice acting i think they do a pretty good job and voice their respective characters well.
They're profiting off a license they don't own. I mean, they even removed the non-profit part of their opening disclaimer. I know people like to say abridgers should get paid for their work but there's only so much they can make hiding behind fair use. You can make an argument their editing, additional animations, voice overs, and changes to the plot warrant some kind of ownership but it doesn't change the fact everything else they're using is another person's property. TFS can bitch about where the fair use is all they want, they're still making money off something they don't own.What does everyone have against TFS?
If it were just a Patreon and no merch then I wouldn't care about that or see a problem with it, but since there is merch you do have a point.They're profiting off a license they don't own. I mean, they even removed the non-profit part of their opening disclaimer. I know people like to say abridgers should get paid for their work but there's only so much they can make hiding behind fair use. You can make an argument their editing, additional animations, voice overs, and changes to the plot warrant some kind of ownership but it doesn't change the fact everything else they're using is another person's property. TFS can bitch about where the fair use is all they want, they're still making money off something they don't own.
The actor who plays a character role is part of the marketing, that's the important part. I would still prefer Schemmel over the previous actors who played Goku if we could turn back the clock and undo all of this.But do they care if a dub actor comes back to voice a character they voiced previously? That's what I was referring to. Outside of just wanting things to stay consistent, I don't think they're super invested in that regard,
So what's the evidence they're citing here? No way would shit like Goku calling Gohan a fag or sacred ointments not have been all over the internet since the pre-Youtube days and been ancient internet memes if that were true. A Wikipedia edit claims "undoing ISWV vandalism, audio leaked in 2002", but that has to be bullshit, since it would've been the subject of middle school rumors before anyone could go on 2006-era Youtube and watch it themselves.Pack it up guys! These leaks are nothing new. They were leaked before all of this and all the VAs have already apologized for them. Also Vic fans don't know how to read and anyone who's using these as a gotcha are shitty people.
View attachment 916625
View attachment 916629
And (correct me if I'm wrong) I heard some shits on /a/ mention that the TFS official Discord is censoring all mention of Funimation's faggotry. Can anyone confirm this?They’re unfunny fat libtards, but that’s pretty much it.
Wikipedos will say anything to undo an edit. Hell they consider sites like Kotaku to be a more valid citation than someone posting actual evidence they don't approve of.So what's the evidence they're citing here? No way would shit like Goku calling Gohan a fag or sacred ointments not have been all over the internet since the pre-Youtube days and been ancient internet memes if that were true. A Wikipedia edit claims "undoing ISWV vandalism, audio leaked in 2002", but that has to be bullshit, since it would've been the subject of middle school rumors before anyone could go on 2006-era Youtube and watch it themselves.
"Evidence? Sounds like some jibberish you just said there. Bet you are some vic stan."So what's the evidence they're citing here? No way would shit like Goku calling Gohan a fag or sacred ointments not have been all over the internet since the pre-Youtube days and been ancient internet memes if that were true. A Wikipedia edit claims "undoing ISWV vandalism, audio leaked in 2002", but that has to be bullshit, since it would've been the subject of middle school rumors before anyone could go on 2006-era Youtube and watch it themselves.
You got me. I would love for someone to prove that this was leaked online earlier or that all the VAs have already apologized for recording them. This is just typical KickVic mentality at work, I guess.So what's the evidence they're citing here? No way would shit like Goku calling Gohan a fag or sacred ointments not have been all over the internet since the pre-Youtube days and been ancient internet memes if that were true. A Wikipedia edit claims "undoing ISWV vandalism, audio leaked in 2002", but that has to be bullshit, since it would've been the subject of middle school rumors before anyone could go on 2006-era Youtube and watch it themselves.
So what's the evidence they're citing here? No way would shit like Goku calling Gohan a fag or sacred ointments not have been all over the internet since the pre-Youtube days and been ancient internet memes if that were true. A Wikipedia edit claims "undoing ISWV vandalism, audio leaked in 2002", but that has to be bullshit, since it would've been the subject of middle school rumors before anyone could go on 2006-era Youtube and watch it themselves.
Thirsty?What is this about Bulma and Android 18 being next though?
If no VA ends up tweeting about the leaks it 100% proves Funi does have control over their "contractor's" social media activity. There is absolutely no way all of those dumbshits would be able to keep their mouths shut about this without being explicitly warned to by their employer.
I've heard that story from him (or at least an account of him speaking of it), but I think a substantial part of his commitment has to do with him wanting to do the role despite how much it slaughters his vocal cords. It was definitely the case when the Broly movie broke records in anime movie history, but even before that, it's hard to imagine that Sabat wasn't trying to voice half of Dragon Ball on his own.
If he was trying to impress a fujo, he deserves to get pound metoo'd on that alone.
Except fire Vic.
If no VA ends up tweeting about the leaks it 100% proves Funi does have control over their "contractor's" social media activity. There is absolutely no way all of those dumbshits would be able to keep their mouths shut about this without being explicitly warned to by their employer.
The only one I don't like is the Goku actor. Being soft spoken & high pitched is fine for Gohan, but not for Goku.
Think that should be a given at this point considering some of them have said nothing for a couple of days. So far Chris Rager, the voice of Hercule, locked his twitter, Chris Sabat nuked his own personal twitter account, I'm blocked from seeing Sean Schemmel but he's been on a ban spree since the first Fag leak dropped while Sonny Straits is talking about other things, Monica is still switching the narrative and Jamie is acting like the condescending little shit she usually is.
You mean the shrill, elderly lady who voiced Astro Boy? Why would you want more of that?He coaches MasakoX to sound more like the JP version.