- Joined
- Jan 19, 2019
yaniv is a lot like the Westboro Baptist Church they both act like assholes to justify lawsuits and everyone hates them
Yaniv vs. the Sikh community - Can you hear the kirpans being sharpened in the night?
- Thread starter SeeingRad
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2015
Because they wear turbans.
To some people, that they get to do this in public, means that they receive some kind of privilege due to their religion.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2019
Jonathan's apology was a typical non-apology: "I'm sorry but you guise made me do it because you're bad, too, which makes me the victim here so - sorry not sorry".
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
Sikhs were involved in a lot of violence in 1980s India, even killing the prime minister in 1984. They're just not associated with terrorism nowadays because they don't have anywhere near as many violent fundamentalists as Islam does, especially outside India.
Yaniv obviously doesn't know about any of this and is just ignorantly prejudiced.
Yaniv obviously doesn't know about any of this and is just ignorantly prejudiced.
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
CowboyBeepBoop
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2019
I mean, shit. Why the Sikhs? If I could choose a religion that I would like my neighbour/roommate to have, that would be my first choice. Jonny Boy, you make no sense.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
Something something, they wear turbans! Something something, diabetes. Dinnae reckon we're going to get much logic out of him, Beep xD
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2014
Well, that's true to a POINT for Sikhs. Their faith is very much a 'forgive and educate over vengence' one, but they've also been genocided and fucked around enough that they've sprung some seriously militant militants, the more savage of which have fled to Canada, and there are a few that wouldn't hesitate to give JY that full frontal neutering he's been asking for if they caught him in a quiet corner somewhere.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2017
Yeah it's messy tbh. And in Canada it has come up numerous times, in particular with events surrounding Jagmeet Singh, the current federal NDP leader. Here's an interesting article that touches on many of the issues.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2018
Sikhs make up a pretty huge number of MPs in the parliament. They do well in law, science and industry and are basically getting the treatment that asians get in the US.
Of course, American Sikhs and Indians are also frowned upon. Lots of Indian politicians in the US will basically pretend to be Muslim by celebrating every Muslim holiday and ignoring every Hindi or Sikh holiday. Canada's conservative party has done a much better job at integrating Indians into their leadership and so you get alot of proudly Sikh/Hindu candidates. Most American Sikh/Hindi leaders are Dems who want victim points.
Canada's NDP is running a Sikh candidate and they literally have no chance of winning. He is viewed as a privileged Sikh boy (Keep in mind, he's competing with Trudeau, a white rich kid).
They're basically the new Jews or Asians. Too successful to be a good minority.
They also do a dogshit job at getting victimhood points. Alot of libs also hate on Filipinos for the same reason.
Khalistan sperging is seen as just that. Kinda why Sikhs aren't flocking in droves to the NDP and their Sikh leader who can't help himself.
Last edited:
I know theres a lot of misguided racism towards Sikhs. I remember a muslim worker getting to take a prayer break and getting paid for it and everyone wondering why they can't do it on their own break, and then ranting about other priviledges they assume the Sikhs have. Wrong brown person my guy.
But the Turban part that people get bent out of shape for is they get away without wearing helmets on motorcycles and try not to ever wear hardhats on construction sites. And its pretty lame when you get kicked off site if you don't have your safety gear, but all the drywallers(generally east indian) get away with a turban and runners because they can't find anyone to replace them.
I know a lot of people say if they get hurt its their own issue. The only problem is everyones Taxes pay for Medical care in Canada so if Mr.Singh takes a header on his bike and survives we're going to be paying to keep him alive on a feeding tube. Where a helmet might of kept him from becoming a vegetable and we might have had to just pay for his rehabilitation.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
Now there's something that actually be interesting to see play out in court.
Rights to faith/exception to health and safety rules.
But nooo, we get wax mah balls instead.
Rights to faith/exception to health and safety rules.
But nooo, we get wax mah balls instead.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
Imagine the cookouts with the neighbors.
Yaniv is just mad that people like Sikhs waaaay more than they like him.
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2018
Sikhs like all cults (all religions are cults) have their share of exceptionalism. They're getting out of OSHA and motorcycle requirements and airport security by saying literally that removing their doo-rag is literally the same as being told to take off their underwear in public same as their holy knife. It's still a fucking knife. They teach removing/displaying body hair is wrong for both sexes, but it appears asspat points are mainly for the males who insist on keeping ratty looking beards. They say everyone's equal at their langar dinners, but then they only prohibit eating animals butchered by halal methods (virtually identical to kocher).
They're a pre-Renaissance derivative of Hinduism/Islam with rules against those who asshurt them, same as Islam, Christianity, post-second temple Judaism and pretty much any other monotheistic religion.
They're a pre-Renaissance derivative of Hinduism/Islam with rules against those who asshurt them, same as Islam, Christianity, post-second temple Judaism and pretty much any other monotheistic religion.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2018
Yaniv converting to Sikhism to carry a knife will be a fun arc.
Toohottotrot
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 12, 2018
this is basically my thinking as well. I wonder what there believes are about other jews success? Are they straight out jealous of others who have attained things they haven't(maybe due disability and related personality issues)? Sorry if this has been discussed before but do we know if JY is a practicing jew?
Munchma Quchi
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2018
All local Langars I'm familiar with offer eggless vegetarian meals. I'm not familiar with any that offer meat, let alone all-meat-except-halal-meat.
In fact the local Indian restaurants that do serve meat usually have a separate halal menu.
There's also plenty of women here who wear turbans and grow out all their hair; bikini waxing ladies aside.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
They can't wear a helmet over the turban? If it's too small, they could wear a larger helmet. Is it against their religion to not have the cloth on their head? Like couldn't the helmet act as the head covering? Couldn't they wear a type of helmet that covers more of the head, like a motorcycle helmet?
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2019
There are a bunch of helmet options for Sikhs now, and the original purpose of the turban was for battle...it can be wrapped around a hard shell helmet without a problem. I have worked with pretty devout Sikh men who wear ball caps over a cloth hair cover. It saves a lot of hassle, and they put their hard hats on after swapping out the cap. I've never been on a site where someone refused a hard hat, but I'm not in construction... I know compliance is a lot harder on that industry. Half the roofers can't be bothered to tie off in my province, so we pay for their idiocy quite often. Plus, we are cramming nomex cold weather balaclavas and hoods under there in winter...once you get used to that, the turban thing is a really dumb argument. You can definitely get one to fit under a hardhat. Likewise a hijab. For six months of the year EVERYONE wears a Nomex hijab FFS.
Many services (police, etc.) have a modified uniform. You can't wear a purple turban with your police uniform, you wear the police one. I think this is a good example of inclusion, tbh.
The knife thing has been tested and retested in Canadian Court, most workplaces accept a dull knife as fine if they have very strict rules on weapons. Mind you, it is totally acceptable in Canada to carry a folding knife or even wear a hunting knife in many places, so it's not like this is "special" outside the city.
In terms of forbidding Halal, I get that. The slaughter techniques are controversial, and for good reason. They could be sanctioned under animal cruelty if not for the exemption. Same with Kosher. The butchering requirements for both are very involved, and seem largely to serve the purpose of employing religious officials. For many smaller abbatoirs the cost of providing Halal and Kosher can't be offset by a cost increase...but it is significantly more costly to perform. Factory operations I'm not sure, but small producers are not taking in huge profits as it is. Unless they have a ready market, a large population essentially demanding kosher or Halal, it's not feasible.
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2018
Regarding the halal prohibition:
www.quora.com
en.wikipedia.org
Langars are always vegetarian because some Sikhs don't believe in eating meat period. The "kutha meat" allegation of "killing animals slowly" extends to halal/kosher methods of slaughter,which involve severing the jugular to kill the animal versus killing food animals "with one strike."
Regarding the motorcycle-hardhat-kirpan dispute and the Canadian courts:
nationalpost.com
The airport scuffle:
www.learnreligions.com
From the above, Sikhs are allowed to bring their knives into some courthouses on account of it being a "religious knife" but haven't had that success with airports. So much drama is unfolding over the turbans, which presently still can technically be searched by American TSA. I've known women wearing those cancer headscarves who have had to take those off at TSA checkpoints in full view, so I'm not especially sympathetic to a "this doorag is holy to me let me through" argument.
Pointing out Sikh exceptionalism doesn't mean they're any more exceptional than others. Christianity started as a reaction against temple Judaism so Greco-Roman panatheists could get in without having to get their dicks circumcised as adults and pay a lot of actual money for years of being made to prove they were worthy--anyone could say they were saved and that was it. Islam started after Christianity had gotten power and was all over the place, with some sects preaching self-castration (Origen) and others going to the free-love extreme. Talmudic Judaism (on which the reform/conservative sects also adhere) say someone born a Jew remains a Jew even if they convert to Islam but not Christianity. The Sikh religion came about is that same kind of miasma, same with Mormonism. It's just another way for people to observe the basic golden rule with addendums that make them feel special and exceptional.
Can a Sikh eat halal? - Quora
Kutha meat - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Langars are always vegetarian because some Sikhs don't believe in eating meat period. The "kutha meat" allegation of "killing animals slowly" extends to halal/kosher methods of slaughter,which involve severing the jugular to kill the animal versus killing food animals "with one strike."
Regarding the motorcycle-hardhat-kirpan dispute and the Canadian courts:
No hard hat, no deal: Quebec court becomes latest to slap down turban exemptions for Sikhs
Sikhs can wear a turban in the army, the Mounties and on a motorcycle in B.C., but all bets are off when it comes to construction sites
nationalpost.com
The airport scuffle:
Navigate Airport Security and TSA Regulations Regarding Sikh Turbans
Sikhs have been victims of sporadic hate crimes across the United States. Air travel has become more difficult for everyone, and Sikhs in particular.
From the above, Sikhs are allowed to bring their knives into some courthouses on account of it being a "religious knife" but haven't had that success with airports. So much drama is unfolding over the turbans, which presently still can technically be searched by American TSA. I've known women wearing those cancer headscarves who have had to take those off at TSA checkpoints in full view, so I'm not especially sympathetic to a "this doorag is holy to me let me through" argument.
Pointing out Sikh exceptionalism doesn't mean they're any more exceptional than others. Christianity started as a reaction against temple Judaism so Greco-Roman panatheists could get in without having to get their dicks circumcised as adults and pay a lot of actual money for years of being made to prove they were worthy--anyone could say they were saved and that was it. Islam started after Christianity had gotten power and was all over the place, with some sects preaching self-castration (Origen) and others going to the free-love extreme. Talmudic Judaism (on which the reform/conservative sects also adhere) say someone born a Jew remains a Jew even if they convert to Islam but not Christianity. The Sikh religion came about is that same kind of miasma, same with Mormonism. It's just another way for people to observe the basic golden rule with addendums that make them feel special and exceptional.