Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Notaries must be physically present face to face with the affiant.

So if one of them was, in fact, physically in Japan, that would present a difficulty.

What a load of bullshit if this was a case.

You can make defamatory claims about people pretty easily from another state or another country if this was the case.

They’re trying to excuse Ahmed lying about who he proclaims was a “victim”.
 
Lemoine and Johnson filed Replies to Support their TCPA Motions to Dismiss:

Nick already refuted half these arguments on his stream last night. But there's so many strongly worded claims that LawTwitter can just quote at face value, they must be wetting themselves non-stop with all the nonsense they've seen filed today.

I especially like the "thanks for proving you're stupid" affirmative defense.

1567547761904.png

1567547792260.png
 
Nick already refuted half these arguments on his stream last night. But there's so many strongly worded claims that LawTwitter can just quote at face value, they must be wetting themselves non-stop with all the nonsense they've seen filed today.

But he says it really stridently, so it must be true! Didn't you know courts decide cases based on how loud you are?

 
I won't scream fraud; I think #2 or #3 are likely, giving the "defect in form" excuse the benefit of the doubt. There's no reason to withdraw and re-introduce unsworn identical statements (except for the 1 correction about Vic's medication) if everything was notarized correctly.
Nick mentioned on his stream last night that removing the Ty-notarized statements would be to keep Ty from being a witness that can be called on to talk about the document. He goes over it here (hopefully I have it timestamped right):
 
Nick already refuted half these arguments on his stream last night. But there's so many strongly worded claims that LawTwitter can just quote at face value, they must be wetting themselves non-stop with all the nonsense they've seen filed today.

I especially like the "thanks for proving you're stupid" affirmative defense.

View attachment 920868
View attachment 920872
How in the fuck did huber confirm vic is a paedophile?
 
Tbh they’d be stupid (borderline committing malpractice) if they didn’t at least try.

I agree, I was asking because SA to DFW is an easier drive/flight and additionally the more unknowns there are the more premature calling it fraud seems to be.

But I think we’re on the same page. If Ty committed fraud I think it is significant, and I wouldn’t be quick to brush it under the rug like some others seem inclined to.

But as I said before, should be easy enough for Ty to disprove, assuming it’s not fraud...

Right, but doesn't fraud have an element of intent, and doing it intentionally for gain?

If he says, "yes, there was a defect with my notarization, it actually was on the 29th, and I mistakenly wrote the 30th because my mind was on the deadline" is that fraud?

Obviously if he never witnessed it at all, then there's fraud. But if he did witness anytime before the 30th, I'd assume its not fraud.
 
Right, but doesn't fraud have an element of intent, and doing it intentionally for gain?

If he says, "yes, there was a defect with my notarization, it actually was on the 29th, and I mistakenly wrote the 30th because my mind was on the deadline" is that fraud?

Obviously if he never witnessed it at all, then there's fraud. But if he did witness anytime before the 30th, I'd assume its not fraud.
Thats fraud either way for a notary if i remember.
 
Nick already refuted half these arguments on his stream last night. But there's so many strongly worded claims that LawTwitter can just quote at face value, they must be wetting themselves non-stop with all the nonsense they've seen filed today.

I especially like the "thanks for proving you're stupid" affirmative defense.

View attachment 920868
View attachment 920872

Huber clearly stated he did not think that Vic is a pedophile. Where in his affidavit did he say otherwise?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt
Nick already refuted half these arguments on his stream last night. But there's so many strongly worded claims that LawTwitter can just quote at face value, they must be wetting themselves non-stop with all the nonsense they've seen filed today.

I especially like the "thanks for proving you're stupid" affirmative defense.

View attachment 920868
View attachment 920872
Shutting them up is why Plaintiff filed this suit.
Absolutely SEETHING. I've gotta say, this doesn't read like the language of a professional.
I actually don't like how any of this is written, comes off very unprofessional. I wouldn't hire this guy.

But this stuff has already been over. I'm more fond of the comments from people asking how Vic and Huber could be friends when Huber has said some bad things about Vic, it really shows the mentality of the KV supporters.
 
Also, holy shit Sam Johnson was reading my mind this entire weekend.

Right when I was writing this post wondering why Ty hadn't entered Jamie's hair-pulling tweet into evidence, he was drafting up the same point:

1567548497815.png

1567548509136.png


GET OUT OF MY HEAD YOU THOT-DEFENDING WIZARD.

Good thing Ty added those tweets last night in the amended complaint, but I don't like how my autism is syncing up with this guy's.
 
Nick already refuted half these arguments on his stream last night. But there's so many strongly worded claims that LawTwitter can just quote at face value, they must be wetting themselves non-stop with all the nonsense they've seen filed today.

I especially like the "thanks for proving you're stupid" affirmative defense.

View attachment 920868
View attachment 920872
Oh, for fuck's sake. It's like they didn't even read Huber's statement. He was clearly referring to Vic's infidelity and that Vic used his status as an anime voice actor to bang random con floozies. That doesn't make him a sexual predator (especially since Huber goes on to state that Vic's sexual interactions were always consensual to the best of his knowledge and that he always stopped when rejected).
 
Oh, for fuck's sake. It's like they didn't even read Huber's statement. He was clearly referring to Vic's infidelity and that Vic used his status as an anime voice actor to bang random con floozies. That doesn't make him a sexual predator (especially since Huber goes on to state that Vic's sexual interactions were always consensual to the best of his knowledge and that he always stopped when rejected).
This has been said before on a similar point, but:

They read it. They understood it. They choose to intentionally misrepresent it anyway.
 
Right, but doesn't fraud have an element of intent, and doing it intentionally for gain?

If he says, "yes, there was a defect with my notarization, it actually was on the 29th, and I mistakenly wrote the 30th because my mind was on the deadline" is that fraud?

Obviously if he never witnessed it at all, then there's fraud. But if he did witness anytime before the 30th, I'd assume its not fraud.

No, the date is a material element of it. This is one where you either do it right or do it wrong and it's a notary's job to do it right. At the very least this any error in something like this would jeopardize your notary license.
 
Also, holy shit Sam Johnson was reading my mind this entire weekend.

Right when I was writing this post wondering why Ty hadn't entered Jamie's hair-pulling tweet into evidence, he was drafting up the same point:

View attachment 920901
View attachment 920902

GET OUT OF MY HEAD YOU THOT-DEFENDING WIZARD.

Good thing Ty added those tweets last night in the amended complaint, but I don't like how my autism is syncing up with this guy's.

Well, Johnson is Law Batman. It's right there in his bio on Social Media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harvey Danger
Vic is pedophile! Vic molest children all the time! Vic preys on children! ..oh we are getting sued Vic doesn't molest children but he tried to have sex with legal twins and ate a jelly bean. I think he cheated on his wife as well.

Oh we can say anything in filings, since it's privileged. Well if you insist.
the childrens.png
 
No, the date is a material element of it. This is one where you either do it right or do it wrong and it's a notary's job to do it right. At the very least this any error in something like this would jeopardize your notary license.
Hopefully we get this addressed. I will be quite mad at Ty if he fucked this up.
 
Does anyone knows what the next step is for Ty to fix those problems with notarization?
And what the potential ramifications are?
 
Even if BCBH has made a number of mistakes in the whole story, we should not exclude the following possibility.
Perhaps Lemoine is not practicing the law, perhaps he is practicing a special kind of voodoo magic the purpose of which is in writing texts, that, when read, make anyone dumber. So even the BHBH fell under the influence of a spell.
 
Imagine being either Marchi or Funimation's attorney. You're just out there doing your best to get your client through this ordeal, maybe hoping for some mercy if you have to settle and then you have an exceptional individual like J. Dolf seemingly doing everything in his power to piss off opposing counsel.

I've said several times already, but I think the only reason Judge Chupp hasn't decide to smack down Casey and Jdolf is because even though they've acted like complete fuckups since Day 1 and forced issues in front of him that should never have had to happen (such as Ron not authenticating his tweets) is because Marchi's and FUNimation's lawyers have been pretty solid thus far and haven't played chickenshit games with the court or wasted its time. That being said, if MoRon's legal team continues to fuck around then the others will pay the price as well since this filing alone shows they are working together (not unexpected) and if Judge Chupp is going to Riverdance all over Lemoine's West Nile infected microdick then it's also likely he'll take into account the actions of the other defendants (like Marchi literally dodging the process server for over a week and laughing about it publicly) and do the same to them as well. You're judged based on who you associate with, after all.

Defendants Omnibus objections to Plaintiff's TCPA evidence.

They're complaining about Ron's tweets not having context.

They don't need context. It's being used to offer evidence of the malice and general disregard for anything over a period of time that leads to the causes of defamation.

This idiot is actually objecting to the fact that Ty didn't include mountains of garbage but only 57 pages of shit that's actually relevant to establishing a prima facie case. Is this guy actually a TCPA expert? Does this guy even have a reputation?

The "argument" is incoherent. He simultaneously argues that somehow 57 pages isn't sufficient to provide prima facie evidence and then screams that they're being bombarded with "scorched earth tactics."

No, that would be dumping 1000+ pages of garbage on the court much of which is unidentifiable as to what it even is.

If Lemoine doesn't have a reputation yet, he will after this case.

He included an 'exhibit 5' in this document that appears not to be cited anywhere within the motion, and that exhibit is Sanctions against Ty's firm for... Something entirely unrelated?

Immaterial to the TCPA and will likely be ignored.

Ty has discussed it. It's not good of course but it's a discovery sanction and it is nearly mandatory that any discovery dispute ends in sanctions for the losing party who, presumably, is at fault for a judge having to decide a discovery issue. It's intended to deter chickenshit squabbles like this, and BHBH apparently ended up on the wrong end of that one.

Ty's been a lawyer for twenty years, Bullock for a similar amount of time...in fact they have something like 150 years of combined experience, and this is the only sanction against them, from four years ago, and it's being appealed? And Lemoine thinks this is somehow indicative of a pattern of conduct?

I knew West Nile could fuck up your cognitive abilities, but this can't all be from Mosquito-kun. I get that West Nile is probably God's sanctions handed down for being a piece of shit, but a loss of competency of this level makes no sense.

Also, I find it funny that Lemoine is bitching about a large filing and essentially tells the Judge, "We're suposed to be the only ones burdening you with filings no one can be expected to read" while also stating a month ago that all this evidencein their TCPAs can't be considered burdensome because it's "been known" to Ty for months, but then turns around and says that literally depositions that have been out for two months and the tweets that have been authenticated by co-counsel are burdensome for them. Jesus fucking Christ, the nerve of this overused prison fucktoy...

whatthefuckjsean.png
 
I would also like to point out a CDA 230 is still being championed by the furher. I can't wait to see how the judge will react to this defense.

the childrens.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt
Back