Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Clockwork Dragon said:
This is amazing to me. Stephanie's career was allegedly torpedoed because she wouldn't put out, and Monica's response is to whine about Stephanie having hard feeling about it and that making her not a good friend. I guess the #MeToo movement is only good for Monica's distortions, and not for someone who potentially experienced an actual scenario where she either had to put out or get out. FFS. Monica really is a trashy, awful person. I will never forget her blaming Ron's victims, either-- #MeToo weilded for jelly bean jokes and consensual kisses, but not for alleged casting couches or actual DV victims. Just disgusting.
Click to expand...

Honestly Monica and Soye deserve each other. Both evil abusive narcissists.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, 774, knux and 11 others
You know, I used to rag on reality tv, but goddamn it if this whole thing isn't producing more and more entertainment. This thing has no end it seems. I actually would appreciate a season break after the hearing.

But, oh my god, how stupid is the Furher going to look when Vic says yes that's my signature, and I signed it. Yeah, I signed it Vic at first and Ty told me to write out my full name. Ty says that's what happened. Judge looks over at the Furher and says, "That's time off your response with this nonsense, buddy. Good move!"
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: lemmiwinks, CuntBusterMan55, Chudbacca and 7 others
10SorrowfulObject said:
The fact that Eric is documented to be hundreds of miles away on the day of the alleged signing is pretty compelling evidence that he was not present in Tyler (or wherever).
Click to expand...

Is there now actual better documentation of that I missed? Because a photo that's not of him uploaded to the kamehacon account isn't compelling evidence he was at the San Antonio con. He definitely could have been, that's just not evidence to me that he was.
 
ErbBetaPatch said:
Monica is spamming hearts in her replies.

I wonder if it's proper to subpoena someone to appear on a one day's notice. I hope Vic didn't have any plans
Click to expand...
Turns out he had plans to be at the Burbank International Film Festival.

My read is that subpoenas can be rescheduled if there's a good reason and normally they wouldn't schedule one on such short notice, but given that it's Vic's trial there might be an assumption that he should be there so the court may be less flexible.

General Relativity QM said:
But, oh my god, how stupid is the Furher going to look when Vic says yes that's my signature, and I signed it. Yeah, I signed it Vic at first and Ty told me to write out my full name. Ty says that's what happened. Judge looks over at the Furher and says, "That's time off your response with this nonsense, buddy. Good move!"
Click to expand...
That's a very big if. Why would Ty tell Vic to sign it with his full first name? It's completely unnecessary. Your signature can be an X and still be valid. Why would the "tor" part of "Victor" match a computer font exactly?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Coach Kreeton Of All That, Mr Bojangles, JerryAttricks and 1 other person
10SorrowfulObject said:
Yes, which is why Lemoine asked Ty first. Presumably Ty would say "oh yeah, they were here for sure" if they had actually signed them in his presence.

The fact that Eric is documented to be hundreds of miles away on the day of the alleged signing is pretty compelling evidence that he was not present in Tyler (or wherever).
Click to expand...
Eric is I take it Chris Slatosch? Where is it documented though? Its 1 day on an event that last all weekend. Noone has found a pic of Chris at the Con yet on either side of this. And keep in mind Lemoine thinks a tweet = when a pic is taken, or that BHBH offices contain the Dr. Stranglove War room. I mean he could be right but when it comes to Criminal charges you need a lot sturdier evidence than circumstantial if I remember correctly.
 
Legioneer said:
I don't know the Texas rules, but so far I have great suspicions that this is an official facsimile signature or something like that.
Click to expand...

I've run through the paperwork. Chuck Huber has different signatures everywhere.

So I seriously think that Chris and Vic just somehow legally gave Ty the right to facsimile sign the documents related to this case on their behalf.

By the way, this may be one possible explanation of what Ty meant when he said the documents were defective in form.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, Francis York Morgan, GenericReviewerDraco and 3 others
Urbanmech said:
Eric is I take it Chris Slatosch? Where is it documented though? Its 1 day on an event that last all weekend. Noone has found a pic of Chris at the Con yet on either side of this. And keep in mind Lemoine thinks a tweet = when a pic is taken, or that BHBH offices contain the Dr. Stranglove War room. I mean he could be right but when it comes to Criminal charges you need a lot sturdier evidence than circumstantial if I remember correctly.
Click to expand...
Well, it's well documented that Eric and Chris are siamese twins, so it is impossible for the two of them to exist in separate locations
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, The Littlest Shitlord, Reigensveld and 2 others
Urbanmech said:
Eric is I take it Chris Slatosch? Where is it documented though? Its 1 day on an event that last all weekend. Noone has found a pic of Chris at the Con yet on either side of this. And keep in mind Lemoine thinks a tweet = when a pic is taken, or that BHBH offices contain the Dr. Stranglove War room. I mean he could be right but when it comes to Criminal charges you need a lot sturdier evidence than circumstantial if I remember correctly.
Click to expand...
I actually don't have first hand attribution on Chris (I can't keep their names straight), but if these were all legitimately signed why would Ty withdraw them because of "defects in form"? And why wouldn't Ty confirm it?
Legioneer said:
I've run through the paperwork. Chuck Huber has different signatures everywhere.

So I seriously think that Chris and Vic just somehow legally gave Ty the right to facsimile sign the documents related to this case on their behalf.

By the way, this may be one possible explanation of what Ty meant when he said the documents was defective in form.
Click to expand...
If they're copying the signature in places electronically that's probably not so bad? I do the same thing with DocuSign I think. But not for the affidavit portion, they gotta do that in person.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Coach Kreeton Of All That and AStupidMonkey
10SorrowfulObject said:
Turns out he had plans to be at the Burbank International Film Festival.

My read is that subpoenas can be rescheduled if there's a good reason and normally they wouldn't schedule one on such short notice, but given that it's Vic's trial there might be an assumption that he should be there so the court may be less flexible.


That's a very big if. Why would Ty tell Vic to sign it with his full first name? It's completely unnecessary. Your signature can be an X and still be valid. Why would the "tor" part of "Victor" match a computer font exactly?
Click to expand...

I have had notaries kick things back to me because I used a shortened version of my name, like Vic for Victor. They tell you to write your full-name, but when you sign your name a lot, you just get in a habit. (No, I am not famous, but I have been a manager where I had to sign for everything.) As for why it looks like a computer font, I don't know. Stranger things have happened. I don't think it is going out on a limb here to say that tor isn't an issue worth anyone's time or speculation or even worry. Ty will look at Vic and Vic will look at Ty, and they both will know the story they need to tell the judge.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, Reigensveld and WrenchWring
Legioneer said:
I've run through the paperwork. Chuck Huber has different signatures everywhere.

So I seriously think that Chris and Vic just somehow legally gave Ty the right to facsimile sign the documents related to this case on their behalf.

By the way, this may be one possible explanation of what Ty meant when he said the documents was defective in form.
Click to expand...
The integrity of notary stamps is a big deal. Calling the affidavits defective doesn't address the problem with the stamp.

We don't know how they got there, all that is alleged is that the affiants were not there in person. There could be an explanation, such as Ty collected the signatures in person and registered them when he got back to his office. This would be bending the rules but not necessarily breaking them.

That said, I spoke with my CPA and a couple lawyers about notarized affidavits. They suggested lawyers on a time crunch have been known to bend the rules and get a stamp on a document without the affiant present in person. They told me some lawsuits have been thrown out because the judge got wind of this happening, and that some lawsuits have proceeded despite bogus stamps.

Without knowing all the facts, they couldn't give me more advice. I'm eager to learn how this plays out. The fact the affidavits are not included in the ultimate motion probably limits the damage.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kosher Salt, CuntBusterMan55, Chudbacca and 6 others
10SorrowfulObject said:
I actually don't have first hand attribution on Chris (I can't keep their names straight), but if these were all legitimately signed why would Ty withdraw them because of "defects in form"? And why wouldn't Ty confirm it?
Click to expand...
It opens Ty up to being a witness even if everything was kosher.

And I would like to add that I have yet to see evidence of Chris Slatosch being physically unable to be in front of Ty.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, A_throwaway_name62919, Reigensveld and 1 other person
Even if Chris was in San Antonio there's no reason he couldn't have driven through FT. Worth on his way there. It's a bitch of a drive but non Texans don't really get it. The fact that Lemoine is trying to actually say that 140 miles (literally less than a 2 hour drive in Texas) is laughable.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: AStupidMonkey, RemoveKebab and Reigensveld
10SorrowfulObject said:
I actually don't have first hand attribution on Chris (I can't keep their names straight), but if these were all legitimately signed why would Ty withdraw them because of "defects in form"? And why wouldn't Ty confirm it?

If they're copying the signature in places electronically that's probably not so bad? I do the same thing with DocuSign I think. But not for the affidavit portion, they gotta do that in person.
Click to expand...
Who knows notice I used the words "If Legitimate", so hard to say why the others were withdrawn besides Vics (wrong drug thing). Could be like Nick said and remove Ty from being called a Witness. And the reason Ty wouldn't confirm it IF legitimate is for Lemoine to make this kind of move. I mean also they wouldn't pay the fee to see the books so why does Ty have to let them see the books? Did they even ask if Ty has a Remote Notary license I honestly can't remember if they did. I wouldn't let them see the books without paying the fee your supposed to, but that's just me being a 20 year 2A AFSC vet.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: lemmiwinks, Emm and troondetector
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back