Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Following up on my previous post, someone sent me a FAQ about dealing with Notaries in Texas.

Frequently Asked Questions for Notaries Public

Frequently Asked Questions for Notaries Public
www.sos.state.tx.us

tl;dr There is a process for complaining about notaries in Texas. Most penalties are concerned with harm. The penalty is usually limited to losing a $10k bond.

Quoting:

How do I file a complaint against a notary public?
To file a complaint against a Texas notary public, submit Form 2304 (Word, Acrobat - Fill in the blank) to the Notary Public Unit. Form 2304 contains detailed instructions for how to complete and submit the complaint. For more information on complaint procedures, please see 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.23.

Who may file a complaint against a notary public?
A person who has been harmed by the actions of a notary public in performing a specific notarization may file a complaint with the secretary of state. The complaint will be reviewed to determine if the complaint states facts that, if proven, constitute grounds for the secretary of state to take disciplinary action.

What type of action may the secretary of state take?
In cases where good cause exists for the secretary of state to take disciplinary action against a notary public, the actions can range from an informal reprimand to revocation of the notary’s commission.

The Office of the Secretary of State cannot determine the validity of the notarized document or obtain restitution for losses that may have been caused by a notary's action. If you need assistance determining the validity of the document or obtaining restitution, consult with your private attorney regarding how to proceed. If you need information regarding filing a claim against the notary’s bond, contact the notary’s surety company. The name of the surety company is available on the Notary Public Search service on the secretary of state’s website.

In addition, the secretary of state does not have the power to prosecute a notary for criminal violations associated with the notary's official duties. If you think there is a basis for criminal action to be taken against a notary, you may file a complaint with the District or County Attorney of the County where the notarization was performed.

What constitutes good cause for the secretary of state to take disciplinary action against a notary public?
Good cause includes, but is not limited to, the acts identified in §406.009(d) of the Texas Government Code and in 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.11.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: NotaLolyer, ConSluttant, Harvey Danger and 4 others
RodgerDodger said:
He'll hand the Judge a motion to Quash. Let Lemoine vent himself on trivial matters first thing in the morning, then have the Judge take it off his time.
Click to expand...
So it really is him just flailing in desperation. Good to know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emm
quickthrowaway said:
And I would like to add that I have yet to see evidence of Chris Slatosch being physically unable to be in front of Ty.
Click to expand...

There's one thing that says it wasn't exactly the way it should be. I don't think it will work in court as evidence, but I'm probably right.
But since I have great suspicions that Lemoine is reading us right now.. I will refrain from voicing this fact.

Lemoine, grow up already!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emm
svetlana.PNG


Better get your ass to Burbank if you want to serve it Lemoiney
 
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, Francis York Morgan, Reigensveld and 3 others
Ivan Shatov said:
A person who has been harmed by the actions of a notary public in performing a specific notarization may file a complaint with the secretary of state.
Click to expand...
That's the money quote.

Who has been harmed by whatever Ty did? Not the defendants. Not Vic. Not Slatosch. As far as I can tell, the only harm has been to my eyes for having to read the same autistic arguments over and over again. I don't think the state of texas will pay out for that, though.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Uranus Pink, Kosher Salt, MysteriousStranger and 13 others
Urbanmech said:
Who knows notice I used the words "If Legitimate", so hard to say why the others were withdrawn besides Vics (wrong drug thing). Could be like Nick said and remove Ty from being called a Witness. And the reason Ty wouldn't confirm it IF legitimate is for Lemoine to make this kind of move. I mean also they wouldn't pay the fee to see the books so why does Ty have to let them see the books? Did they even ask if Ty has a Remote Notary license I honestly can't remember if they did. I wouldn't let them see the books without paying the fee your supposed to, but that's just me being a 20 year 2A AFSC vet.
Click to expand...

Or, even more likely, Ty refused to confirm anything because Lemon Hitler's been a dick since he showed up and Ty doesn't owe him shit without the fees paid in full
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, Emm, Army Burger and 2 others
Jesus, 40 pages ago people were talking about Ty commiting fraud and there was only so much I could read before my eyes blazed over.

When will it be confirmed he did/did not fuck up?
 
Isn't the screenshot of Steph saying she's hacked supposedly photoshopped? She hasn't said anything publicly.
 
teriyakiburns said:
That's the money quote.

Who has been harmed by whatever Ty did? Not the defendants. Not Vic. Not Slatosch. As far as I can tell, the only harm has been to my eyes for having to read the same autistic arguments over and over again. I don't think the state of texas will pay out for that, though.
Click to expand...
My take: it's not as simple as it sounds and that's why we have lawyers.

The Judge may tell Lemonie to take it to the Notary Board and stop wasting the Court's time. The Judge may become gravely concerned about the Plaintiff's claims and question counsel.

No use getting worked up about something we don't understand.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: räkäkäpälä and The Wisdom of Bassets
2lolis1cup said:
I can't wait for 6 more pages talking about Ty's fucking stamp. Forget talking about the case lets just theorize over and over about one thing that is a black and white scenario. He did or he didn't. He is fine or he is fucked.

I can't believe Lemoine is being less exceptional than half the user's "theorys" about how Ty's stamp was used. (his theory was that they were too far to drive so Ty faked it)
Click to expand...
PrinceofAllCucks said:
Can we please just wait for the fucking hearing? Speculation isn't gonna do jackshit right now and this thread is just turning into a circle jerk of "if" and "well ackshually".
I'll happily take my mad at the internets if we can fucking move on from this shit.
Click to expand...
I posted a rant about this speculation on page 353. I lamented 6 more pages of drivel on it. It is now 30 pages deep and no sight of anything other than tism that would rival any other forum I've seen.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Salt, AStupidMonkey, Struggler and 8 others
The statement could have been thrashed out through email, printed off and Ty and Chris just met for the 2 minutes it would have taken to sort it all out.
The truth is we don't know how the notary shit went, as for Lemwaaaah's subpoena, I think he might be trying to spring this fraud shit on Ty as an A-Ha! moment. Might have worked too had he not blown his load all over a filing.
Pretty sure the hearing tomorrow is gonna end being Loony Lemwaaaah's incredible circus, "Step right up folks! We got the Best freak show in town starring the craziest clowns you ever saw!!"
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Riceprice, LuNaS and 11 others
Dr. Geronimo said:
So it really is him just flailing in desperation. Good to know.
Click to expand...

What's that old saying when the law is on your side argue the law, when the facts are on your side argue the facts, when nothing is on your side pound your fists and shriek like a 3 year old until somebody gives you something to shut you the fuck up. Lemoine is in part 3. He knows he has nothing. He is trying to wage some clever campaign or wargaming against the master. He really isn't getting enough oxygen to his brain.

See even IF there is something improper with regards to the notarization. Ty withdrew those. Which to Chupp will likely mean, it's not his problem to deal with. "Mr. Lemoine please address all such complaints to the office of Secretary of State. MOVING ON!" We are going rounds and rounds arguing stupidity regarding the notarization. But as soon as Ty Beard withdrew those documents and filed to Amend it's quite literally not Chupp's problem. As others have said Chupp's goal is to get this case to trial. Not to wade through this petty assed bullshit. Subpoena'ing opposing council regarding a document that he withdrew within minutes of filing does not work towards Chupp's goal. At best Chupp might strike the Affidavits in question. Although I don't see how he could strike the Plaintiff's. Is Lemoine seeking to claim that Ty Beard forged Vic's Affidavit? Y'know, Vic, his client, the man who has given him Power of Attorney? That Vic?

Ty is likely guilty of cutting a corner that everyone in the modern era does. It's one of the guilty secrets of how the law works. Many of the processes of it remain medievel in a 21st century communication world. The practitioners are forced to work around this.

But does Lemoine really want people digging through Affidavits and calling them into question? Within his filings he has shown a deliberate and wonton disregard for truth in some of the tales he is presenting.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Slimy Time, Riceprice and 15 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back