- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok, so what do they say?What the fuck do you mean 'An unique conclusion'
He has to follow the directions of the Fort Worth court of appeals, he is literally bound by law too. It doesn't matter what any other appellant court says but the Fort Worth one does or the Supreme court does.
I find it pretty dull tbh.The pregame chat is spicy.
I see the argument in chat but have no idea who John Kelly is or how he's important enough to respond to.So remember how John Kelly wanted on Nick's stream? No? Neither did I. He's in the chat arguing with Nick about who knows what. I'd rather have an Orca suck my dick before giving a damn about anything he says.
I dunno you're the big fuckin brain here. You seemed so certain that Chupp did no wrong. I hope you brought receipts to back that up.Ok, so what do they say?
He is no one important. Just another shane in the making.I see the argument in chat but have no idea who John Kelly is or how he's important enough to respond to.
I was just speculating from the information that I saw just to try and make sense of what happened and as far as I understand. I'm not claiming that he did a good job, I'm claiming that this law is shit, since some definitions are ambiguous. And that Ty did a shitty job for not accounting for that.I dunno you're the big fuckin brain here. You seemed so certain that Chupp did no wrong. I hope you brought receipts to back that up.
If Fort Worth or the Supreme court hasn't said anything, all that means is that the case has a clear appeal on those grounds.
I find it pretty dull tbh.
I prefer just chatting here. You get spicier takes and actually get to call the person a faggot.
Yes, everyone agrees the law is shit. But that doesn't let the Judge just pick and choose evidentiary levels case by case, or worse, claim by claim.I was just speculating from the information that I saw just to try and make sense of what happened and as far as I understand. I'm not claiming that he did a good job, I'm claiming that this law is shit, since some definitions are ambiguous.
Yes, everyone agrees the law is shit. But that doesn't let the Judge just pick and choose evidentiary levels case by case, or worse, claim by claim.
Shit I'm just here because it's the only way to talk about this case in a non autistic format. Reddit is dead when it comes to this subject and twitter gives me nausea when I try to read it.
The problem with Algorithms is that garbage in means garbage out.That's why I favor where possible writing algorithms that make decisions based on available data. Better consistency and machines don't have a bias.
in a non autistic format
Shit I'm just here because it's the only way to talk about this case in a non autistic format. Reddit is dead when it comes to this subject and twitter gives me nausea when I try to read it.
That's kinda my point.The problem with Algorithms is that garbage in means garbage out.
And thats assuming the algorithm isn't also garbage.
So have you learned about pups having silicon injected into their balls yet or notShit I'm just here because it's the only way to talk about this case in a non autistic format. Reddit is dead when it comes to this subject and twitter gives me nausea when I try to read it.
The problem with Algorithms is that garbage in means garbage out.
And thats assuming the algorithm isn't also garbage.