Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
Holden said:
Ok, look, you obviously don't know how to comprehend text or make an argument. I said it is the most malicious thing in the world for reasons much deeper than the fact that nobody can have it, otherwise most things in the world would be that. You can't make arguments so there is no point in running this conversation with you.
Click to expand...

Alright motherfucker, lets do this. *cracks knuckles*

This is the sentence you wrote.

Holden said:
Yes, beating somebody until they are (hopefully not permanently) disabled is painful, but 1. It is still better than the sick procedure of seduction, which is the most malicious in the world since not everybody can use it, while basically everybody can beat.
Click to expand...

First off, it is not the sentence you claim it is in the above post. There are different words.

Holden said:
I said it is the most malicious thing in the world for reasons much deeper than the fact that nobody can have it, otherwise most things in the world would be that.
Click to expand...

Second off, lets break this sentence down into its parts.

----

Holden said:
Yes, beating somebody until they are (hopefully not permanently) disabled is painful, but 1. It is still better than the sick procedure of seduction, which is the most malicious in the world since not everybody can use it, while basically everybody can beat.
Click to expand...

You agree that beating someone until they are disabled is painful. You add that you hope its not permanent, trying to minimize the fact that you agreed with me earlier in the argument.

Holden said:
Yes, beating somebody until they are (hopefully not permanently) disabled is painful, but 1. It is still better than the sick procedure of seduction, which is the most malicious in the world since not everybody can use it, while basically everybody can beat.
Click to expand...

You then go on to elaborate that beating someone until they are disabled is better than the "sick procedure of seduction."

Holden said:
Yes, beating somebody until they are (hopefully not permanently) disabled is painful, but 1. It is still better than the sick procedure of seduction, which is the most malicious in the world since not everybody can use it, while basically everybody can beat.
Click to expand...

You explain why seduction is the most malicious [MISSING NOUN] in the world, because not everyone can employ seduction.

Holden said:
Yes, beating somebody until they are (hopefully not permanently) disabled is painful, but 1. It is still better than the sick procedure of seduction, which is the most malicious in the world since not everybody can use it, while basically everybody can beat.
Click to expand...

After explaining that seduction is the most malicious [THING] in the world because not everybody can wield or use it, you further justify that beating somebody until they are disabled is not as malicious because basically everybody can use that tactic.

Tell me how I'm misinterpreting this sentence, I dare you.

----

Now, lets examine what you THINK your sentence said.

Holden said:
I said it is the most malicious thing in the world for reasons much deeper than the fact that nobody can have it, otherwise most things in the world would be that.
Click to expand...

Well, you remembered your noun this time around, gold star for effort, You mention that [implied subject "seduction] is the most malicious thing in the world.

Holden said:
I said it is the most malicious thing in the world for reasons much deeper than the fact that nobody can have it, otherwise most things in the world would be that.
Click to expand...

Okay, in the previous sentence you mention nothing of these nebulous, undefined "deeper reasons." If you did, highlight them in the first sentence. Go ahead, I've linked it at least 5 times already, you should be able to stumble upon one of them and be able to copy-paste it and highlight your mention of "reasons deeper than the fact nobody can have it"

Also, you've switched up "using" seduction for "possessing" seduction. Which is it that you mean? Is seduction something you employ and use, or is it something you own and have?

Holden said:
I said it is the most malicious thing in the world for reasons much deeper than the fact that nobody can have it, otherwise most things in the world would be that.
Click to expand...

Again, nothing whatsoever about this in the previous sentence. In the first sentence, you are comparing beating someone until they are disabled and the use of seduction. You say seduction is worse, because not everybody can use it, while nearly everybody can use beatings. This implies that the use of seduction is not fair, as though you're comparing relationships between people as some sort of game with previously established rules, and a sense of "equal opportunity" between all participants. If one side is employing a tactic the other side cannot, it is not fair to the other side, and therefore should be considered "bad" or "malicious", because its not in keeping with the spirit of fair competition.

In THIS sentence, you merely state that "otherwise most things in the world would be that." You are saying that seduction is the most malicious thing in the world, for [NEBULOUS UNDEFINED REASONS MISSING FROM THE ARGUMENT] that are NOT just simply the fact that nobody can have/use it, because if that was true, most other things would be seduction.

I don't think even you have nailed down exactly what you're trying to say. Or maybe you do, and you're just doing a piss poor job of saying it. I think what you're trying to say is that seduction is the most malicious thing in the world because not everybody can have/use it, and if they could, then everyone would. Or if seduction was employable by everyone, then every romantic acquisition tactic would be simply seduction. That version of the sentence at least lines up with the "fair competition" explanation. But you can't write well enough to say what you mean.

AND IN ANY CASE, YOU ARE NOT SAYING WHAT YOU SAID IN THE FIRST SENTENCE.

Correct me on any of this, if you can.

*Drops microphone, walks off stage*
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Cephalometrist, Ti-99/4A, NobleGreyHorse and 4 others
Holden said:
None of this is defamation. It's disagreement and you said malatrova said he wanted it abolished.
Click to expand...
Do you know how to read and comprehend the things that are written?
You call us stupid but oh my god, this is just too much.

1) It's defamation. You are trying to discredit myself and others. You are literally taking my story (and other people's stories) and completely slandering them. It's not a disagreement. Defamation is taking someone's ideals or reputation and slandering them (or libel). That's what all your reddit posts are doing. You aren't "disagreeing" about the fact that people don't like rape, you are taking instances of rape and slandering/libeling them so much that you completely change what the original event was.
2) I will literally say this one more time. Malatrova wants the age of consent completely gone. He wants to touch and be touched by children. He heard/read that you want to lower the age of consent to 12 or whatever and 'ran with it' to the point where he said something like "I'm not the only person that wants the age of consent gone... ask Holden". I'm not the one that said you said you wanted it gone. He is. Jesus fucking christ. So stupid.

Holden said:
Like I told before, I will correct Null's mistakes. My comments on his shenanigans will be of much different nature.
Click to expand...
Doooooo it!!!! No balls. Seriously... you've got no balls.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Holden said:
Yes, beating somebody until they are (hopefully not permanently) disabled is painful, but 1. It is still better than the sick procedure of seduction
Click to expand...

tl;dr you cant talk like a normal person so like the rape trucker ape god you are you prefer to beat to death a women because you want sex NOWNOWNOWNOWNOWNOW

sadly you are a coward and a weakling, all the womens in the world are safe
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Holden said:
i don't have a problem with that, as long as they can be proven to be true. a sick person like cephalo can't even prove basic things, like how i look or my surname. hell, he has enough problems with my first name.
Click to expand...
He corrected both of those things.... he said you look worse than your avatar and that you spell your name wrong in hopes that no one will dox you.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Holden said:
sammy, is that a joke? i obviously talked about seduction as being bad because it's the only horrible way to get women that leaves no space to anybody who isn't retarded, while even a decent man can beat women because anybody can flail their arms around. c'mon, dude.
Click to expand...
Does it hurt with Sammy's foot lodged all the way in there, buddy?
Your rebuttal can be summarized as "C'mon dude....".
 
  • Like
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Holden said:
sammy, is that a joke? i obviously talked about seduction as being bad because it's the only horrible way to get women that leaves no space to anybody who isn't retarded, while even a decent man can beat women because anybody can flail their arms around. c'mon, dude.
Click to expand...
If retards are getting all the women and leaving none for you that says something about you, not society or seduction.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ti-99/4A and NobleGreyHorse
4Macie said:
He corrected both of those things.... he said you look worse than your avatar
Click to expand...
what? my point is that he has absolutely no way of knowing how i look at all. if he wants the truth he should delete all of these photos. that's the point, not what he thinks about me. same goes for my surname - he has no way of knowing.

PurpleMonkeyDishwasher said:
If retards are getting all the women and leaving none for you that says something about you, not society or seduction.
Click to expand...
yes, it says a lot about me - that i am not a retard and a rapist, and as thus hated. if i cut a woman's spine in half i'd be a glorified lord.

Dr. Boe Jangles Esq. said:
Does it hurt with Sammy's foot lodged all the way in there, buddy?
Your rebuttal can be summarized as "C'mon dude....".
Click to expand...
it, is c'mon, dude. i can't believe he'd argue something that demented in such a long, pointless post.
 
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
Reactions: deductionotaku, Ti-99/4A, NobleGreyHorse and 3 others
Holden said:
yes, it says a lot about me - that i am not a exceptional individual and a rapist, and as thus hated. if i cut a woman's spine in half i'd be a glorified lord.
Click to expand...
No, you wouldn't. And you're all talk anyway. Go do it, tough guy, we'll wait.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Holden said:
sammy, is that a joke? i obviously talked about seduction as being bad because it's the only horrible way to get women that leaves no space to anybody who isn't retarded, while even a decent man can beat women because anybody can flail their arms around. c'mon, dude.
Click to expand...

So now that sentence is a third thing that wasn't either concept that you mentioned earlier?
You're bad at this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back