Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS

Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought it was a fun stream except for that that retard trying to suck Nick's ass about being an informant. That was physically painful to sit through. The odd person here and there that just kinda wanted the experience of being on a livestrean I can live with. The whole point of the stream was to spite that idiot on twitter so a few people who join and provide nothing themselves is perfect imo.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: TLS, Hotfartz :), GenericReviewerDraco and 1 other person
Screech Man Bad said:
I thought it was a fun stream except for that that exceptional individual trying to suck Nick's ass about being an informant. That was physically painful to sit through. The odd person here and there that just kinda wanted the experience of being on a livestrean I can live with. The whole point of the stream was to spite that idiot on twitter so a few people who join and provide nothing themselves is perfect imo.
Click to expand...

I found that part somewhat salvageable just because Nick used it to explain some of how his journalistic shield works with regard to sources.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt
It has something to do with the courts, but it isn't a filing. It has the potential to be huge, including dragging Marchi back into things - meaning likely upsetting the hearing - but it might do nothing at all. Nick's not sure it's ever been done before, so it's a weird maverick move.

Is there anything a person could possibly do that isn't technically a filing that might either;

1 - replace Chupp immediately
2 - force the entire hearing to be redone from scratch and throw out the previous results due to, essentially, mistrial?

And could be done in the span of a week?

If you can figure out something that satisfies those criteria and isn't illegal, it's probably that.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Feels
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Zero Day Defense, Hotfartz :) and 2 others
Allanon said:
It has something to do with the courts, but it isn't a filing. It has the potential to be huge, including dragging Marchi back into things - meaning likely upsetting the hearing - but it might do nothing at all. Nick's not sure it's ever been done before, so it's a weird maverick move.

Is there anything a person could possibly do that isn't technically a filing that might either;

1 - replace Chupp immediately
2 - force the entire hearing to be redone from scratch and throw out the previous results due to, essentially, mistrial?

And could be done in the span of a week?

If you can figure out something that satisfies those criteria and isn't illegal, it's probably that.
Click to expand...

Answer to both questions with one word: No

Outside of finding Chupp was sleeping with the defendants, getting bribes from lemonjello's snack tray, or becoming a regular on Funimations DragonBall:Hedonism 2089 there is nothing that can be done LEGALLY to remove a sitting judge from hearing a case they have already begun working on. Without demonstrating a clear conflict of interest Chupp is on this case till it goes to appeal which we all know it will.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GenericReviewerDraco and indianshedevil
Reverend said:
Answer to both questions with one word: No

Outside of finding Chupp was sleeping with the defendants, getting bribes from lemonjello's snack tray, or becoming a regular on Funimations DragonBall:Hedonism 2089 there is nothing that can be done LEGALLY to remove a sitting judge from hearing a case they have already begun working on. Without demonstrating a clear conflict of interest Chupp is on this case till it goes to appeal which we all know it will.
Click to expand...

Is there some way that one could potentially force the hearing to be redone? Maybe some old law on the books that hasn't been used in years? I wouldn't know, I'm just trying to guess what would fit all of his hints. The closest thing I can think of is something that forces a blank slate to redo the hearing. It's not a filing, it involves the courts, it's bizarre and possibly never done before, it may have massive impact or might do nothing, and most especially it may yank Marchi back into things.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Hotfartz :), indianshedevil and Dean Pentel
Allanon said:
Is there some way that one could potentially force the hearing to be redone? Maybe some old law on the books that hasn't been used in years? I wouldn't know, I'm just trying to guess what would fit all of his hints. The closest thing I can think of is something that forces a blank slate to redo the hearing. It's not a filing, it involves the courts, it's bizarre and possibly never done before, it may have massive impact or might do nothing, and most especially it may yank Marchi back into things.
Click to expand...
A second hearing?

I mean, who's ever heard of two TCPA hearings for one case.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Zero Day Defense, Hotfartz :) and Allanon
Allanon said:
Is there some way that one could potentially force the hearing to be redone? Maybe some old law on the books that hasn't been used in years? I wouldn't know, I'm just trying to guess what would fit all of his hints. The closest thing I can think of is something that forces a blank slate to redo the hearing. It's not a filing, it involves the courts, it's bizarre and possibly never done before, it may have massive impact or might do nothing, and most especially it may yank Marchi back into things.
Click to expand...
Nick could get his black friend to tweet that Chupp dream raped him. That should seal the judge's fate, and ensure a new judge that's more sensitive to racial diversity and gay pants comes in. Tweeting your way toward the reality you want always works. At least that's what this talking shovel I know says.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: BoomerPrime, Zero Day Defense, Hotfartz :) and 3 others
Allanon said:
Is there some way that one could potentially force the hearing to be redone? Maybe some old law on the books that hasn't been used in years? I wouldn't know, I'm just trying to guess what would fit all of his hints. The closest thing I can think of is something that forces a blank slate to redo the hearing. It's not a filing, it involves the courts, it's bizarre and possibly never done before, it may have massive impact or might do nothing, and most especially it may yank Marchi back into things.
Click to expand...
I was thinking trying to get a redone hearing was in fact the attempt as well
 
Sheryl Nome said:
Such a thing seems like it would be impermissible under the explicitly stated intent of the TCPA
Click to expand...

My guess would be 'dusty old state law/procedure designed to handle a hearing where the judge clearly doesn't know what he's presiding over', it would predate the TCPA, and thus not be written with consideration for that crappy law. It would also explain why Nick isn't sure if it's ever been done. It's like the law that was on the books in some states where discharging a prisoner required giving them a horse, a rifle, and $20, right up until a few people invoked that law and the state had to honor it.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Hotfartz :)
Unless Ron did something stupid.

Follow me here. Ron uses Emoji's as a coping mechanism under the "best" of circumstances. That doesn't seem like a particularly robust coping mechanism. He's been under stress for months, bills piling up, lawyer forces him off Twitter, some internet shock jock calling him a cuck.

We already know he is transcribing YouTube videos for a retalitary lawsuit. Nick claims that he has been texting witnesses to change their stories. Hell, he has probably been shaking down everyone he knows to find someone else to make claims against Vic.

Finally the TCPA hearing comes and Marchi gets off the hook, but Ron, Monica and Funimation are still on for defamation. That claim, the one claim that Lemoine and LawTwitter have told him for months would be dismissed out of hand, is the one damn thing the judge has to think about.

Ron probably flipped his shit and tried sending messages to the judge or Ron took a shit in the judges yard.

Alternative theory: The loan for Chupp's house came from through the Tuttle Group. Maybe some inappropriate background messages were exchanged.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: TLS, GenericReviewerDraco, Dean Pentel and 1 other person
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back