Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Lol.

Because they know damn well any impeachment vote will be used as a cudgel by the GOP and Trump. Bet you hard cash those Reps voting yes on impeachment are the ones who aren't up for reelection this cycle or face no opposition.
 
0E9F1FB3-A24E-482D-BD94-82FA2EF8DF1D.jpeg
 
>buy back

What if somebody just doesn't want to have their guns "bought back"? What if somebody just wants to keep their guns?

The shortsightedness of "muh gun buyback" proposers, I swear...

No, you see, that's built-in. As a "law-abiding gun owner", you are thereby forced by the law to sell your guns to the government (for a pittance). If you don't want to sell your guns to the government, you are therefore a criminal, and criminals shouldn't have guns.

They know full well what they're doing. They hate the optics of having their opponents point out that they want to infringe on the rights of law-abiding citizens and responsible gun owners, so they figure they're extremely clever by coming up with ways for it to be impossible to be those things. They think the witty answer to "responsible, law-abiding citizens should be able to own guns" is "well if you protest our unconstitutional buyback law, that means you're not law-abiding, therefore not responsible, therefore you shouldn't have guns, checkMATE filthy freedom-wanters!"
 
Taylor Swift's new interview is so fucking cringe it makes MovieBob the new Immanuel Kant.

This is what she said about politics.
You sing about “American stories burning before me.” Do you mean the illusions of what America is?
It’s about the illusions of what I thought America was before our political landscape took this turn, and that naivete that we used to have about it. And it’s also the idea of people who live in America, who just want to live their lives, make a living, have a family, love who they love, and watching those people lose their rights, or watching those people feel not at home in their home. I have that line “I see the high-fives between the bad guys” because not only are some really racist, horrific undertones now becoming overtones in our political climate, but the people who are representing those concepts and that way of looking at the world are celebrating loudly, and it’s horrific.

You’re in this weird place of being a blond, blue-eyed pop star in this era — to the point where until you endorsed some Democratic candidates, right-wingers, and worse, assumed you were on their side.
I don’t think they do anymore. Yeah, that was jarring, and I didn’t hear about that until after it had happened. Because at this point, I, for a very long time, I didn’t have the internet on my phone, and my team and my family were really worried about me because I was not in a good place. And there was a lot of stuff that they just dealt with without telling me about it. Which is the only time that’s ever happened in my career. I’m always in the pilot seat, trying to fly the plane that is my career in exactly the direction I want to take it. But there was a time when I just had to throw my hands up and say, “Guys, I can’t. I can’t do this. I need you to just take over for me and I’m just going to disappear.”

Are you referring to when a white-supremacist site suggested you were on their team?
I didn’t even see that, but, like, if that happened, that’s just disgusting. There’s literally nothing worse than white supremacy. It’s repulsive. There should be no place for it. Really, I keep trying to learn as much as I can about politics, and it’s become something I’m now obsessed with, whereas before, I was living in this sort of political ambivalence, because the person I voted for had always won. We were in such an amazing time when Obama was president because foreign nations respected us. We were so excited to have this dignified person in the White House. My first election was voting for him when he made it into office, and then voting to re-elect him. I think a lot of people are like me, where they just didn’t really know that this could happen. But I’m just focused on the 2020 election. I’m really focused on it. I’m really focused on how I can help and not hinder. Because I also don’t want it to backfire again, because I do feel that the celebrity involvement with Hillary’s campaign was used against her in a lot of ways.

You took a lot of heat for not getting involved. Does any part of you regret that you just didn’t say “fuck it” and gotten more specific when you said to vote that November?
Totally. Yeah, I regret a lot of things all the time. It’s like a daily ritual.

Were you just convinced that it would backfire?
That’s literally what it was. Yeah. It’s a very powerful thing when you legitimately feel like numbers have proven that pretty much everyone hates you. Like, quantifiably. That’s not me being dramatic. And you know that.

There were a lot of people in those stadiums.
It’s true. But that was two years later. . . . I do think, as a party, we need to be more of a team. With Republicans, if you’re wearing that red hat, you’re one of them. And if we’re going to do anything to change what’s happening, we need to stick together. We need to stop dissecting why someone’s on our side or if they’re on our side in the right way or if they phrased it correctly. We need to not have the right kind of Democrat and the wrong kind of Democrat. We need to just be like, “You’re a Democrat? Sick. Get in the car. We’re going to the mall.”
 
Remind me, what’s the legal definition of an “assault weapon?” And wasn’t there a gun law police couldn’t enforce because of this reason?
I'm going to assume your honestly asking, so here you go.

The '94 national ban used the following definition, some states and municipalities used this definition when writing their own local statutes governing firearms prior to or after the national ban which is why I know it well.

Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
Folding or telescoping stock
Pistol grip
Bayonet lug or mount
Flash suppressor or threading for one
Grenade launcher mount

Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip
Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or noise suppressor
Barrel shroud safety feature that prevents burns to the operator
Unloaded weight of 3 and 1/8th lbs or more
Semi-automatic version of a fully automatic firearm

Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following:
Folding or telescoping stock
Pistol grip
Detachable magazine.

All break, slide, bolt, pump or lever actions where exempt from the ban as were revolvers.

There was a grand fathered date for weapons purchased prior to the ban, allowance for ownership of permanently inoperable weapons and antique firearms, a long list of weapons that were specifically excluded from the ban like the Ruger Mini 14 with short magazines but without a folding stock, and a similar list of weapons that were specifically banned, most of which were mostly foreign imports, primarily from the Eastern Bloc manufactures.
 
Remind me, what’s the legal definition of an “assault weapon?” And wasn’t there a gun law police couldn’t enforce because of this reason?
I think I recall what you’re talking about. Some state in the south west passed an assault weapons ban and tried to use it to charge somebody that had a semi automatic weapon. Their lawyer argued that a semi-automatic weapon isn’t an assault weapon and won.
 
Remind me, what’s the legal definition of an “assault weapon?” And wasn’t there a gun law police couldn’t enforce because of this reason?
This is the whole damn problem many gun owners/advocates have with the gun control crowd. These people want to regulate an industry with laws but don't seem to care about learning terminology. It's not like these terms are just made up. They're related to patents, machine specs, manufacturing processes, and a whole host of other things. Any law a gun control advocate proposes needs to be meticulous about terminology if they want a gun advocate to even read the damn thing. Because otherwise it will be seen as intentionally vague and some sort of trick to overreach on gun control.

And let's also be real, gun advocates would never agree to this mythical well-written gun control law, but I promise you there would be more fruitful discussion surrounding such things if the gun control advocates demonstrated that they had read a trade magazine or gun-related literature. And with all of that said...

Go Beto! Go! Don't stop.
 
In this case, Trump is right. It is going to be harder to make a compromise if the other side is going to the absolute extreme.

And then you have to factor in the Dems idea of "compromise" which usually means "Hey Republicans, give us all these gun control measures that we want while you get nothing in return except angry constituents and a weaker 2nd Amendment".
 
And then you have to factor in the Dems idea of "compromise" which usually means "Hey Republicans, give us all these gun control measures that we want while you get nothing in return except angry constituents and a weaker 2nd Amendment".
"Compromise" in modern ideological politics has always meant "my side gets what it wants, and your side angrily sits in silence while my side laughs in your face". It's zero sum game shit that breeds civil wars, but all is justified if it happens in the name of "progress".

We could move closer to an idealized responsible gun owner and regulated gun ownership, but instead the ONLY way "forward" on the issue is criminalizing gun ownership and having an unregulated black market where an automatic is as easy to get as a semiautomatic. Think the Drug War was bad? Wait till the war on guns.
 
Last edited:
"Compromise" in modern ideological politics has always meant "my side gets what it wants, and your side angrily sits in silence while my side laughs in your face". It's zero sum game shit that breeds civil wars, but all is justified if it happens in the name of "progress".

We could move closer to an idealized responsible gun owner and regulated gun ownership, but instead the ONLY way "forward" on the issue is criminalizing gun ownership and having an unregulated black market where an automatic is as easy to get as a semiautomatic. Think the Drug War was bad? Wait till the war on guns.
It is hilarious how many of those advocating for gun control also advocate for open borders.

I've yet to hear a solid plan on how exactly they're going to keep cartels from just bringing guns back into the country through that porous border...
 
Back