Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Wasn't the ABA trying to force their members to sign some sort of pledge to uphold Social Justice a while back?

Them being woke isn't that huge of a surprise.
ABA is a woke joke, but this is still very out of the norms from them.
 
ABA is a woke joke, but this is still very out of the norms from them.

Aye. But remember the radical left, the literal Marxists, are trying Entryism on every neutral organization of merit to drive them at least "leans left" if not outright left. The ACLU, for example, once defended Rush Limbaugh, there's no fucking way the ACLU of 2019 would defend, say, Tucker Carlson.
 
Aye. But remember the radical left, the literal Marxists, are trying Entryism on every neutral organization of merit to drive them at least "leans left" if not outright left. The ACLU, for example, once defended Rush Limbaugh, there's no fucking way the ACLU of 2019 would defend, say, Tucker Carlson.
yeah but the ABA literally doesn't matter which is kind of ncie, its been considered a bit of a joke for awhile.
 
What people say about mediation is the ideal. What happens in mediation is the reality. If it works, it saves everyone a lot of time and trouble. If it doesn't, things proceed in their own brutal fashion.

The thing to remember is all parties have an interest in the case being resolved, including the Judge and the Mediator. The Mediator will try hard to make the Plaintiff and Defendants feel heard during the session while reminding everyone of what's in their best interests. Sometimes that leads to a breakthrough where everyone sees the wisdom in finding an alternative to a big fight. Sometimes not.

My first experience with mediation was kind of wild. Got to the law office about 30 minutes early, found out my counsel, my opponent's counsel, the Judge and the Mediator all played golf at the same course, sometimes together. The lawyers were all friendly beforehand, talking about each other's families and telling stories. We walked into a room and it was like a switch flipped, the lawyers were at each other's throats, angrily damning each other faster than I could follow. The mediator eventually took over, asked the other side to talk, asked me to talk, let us question each other for a while, then asked each side a bunch of questions.

After a couple hours, he showed us his notepad and a list of pros and cons for each side. He explained a little bit about how the law worked and how the Judge liked to rule on certain things. He presented what he saw as a fair settlement, and it turned out he'd talked about it beforehand with both of our attorneys. He asked us some personal questions and there was a little budge on each side with what we would accept. The attorneys argued for a little bit, it sounded like we had an agreement, then the other side just stood up and left. The whole thing lasted about 3.5 hours.

I didn't really understand what we accomplished, it ended abruptly and I didn't get a debrief right away. My attorney called me a few days later to explain the other side's attorneys needed time to explain "the facts of life" to their clients. They settled about 2 months later, on the first day of trial, on the way into the courthouse. There was a brief hearing to announce the settlement, the Judge gave a short speech, then everyone left.

Never saw the mediator again. While I have no knowledge of any behind-the-scenes communications, my attorney seemed very aware of what the other side was up to right until the settlement. We didn't know they were going to make an offer but nothing about it surprised him, we were able to review the terms and accept it on the spot. The offer was slightly better than what was proposed at mediation, it was just enough for me to agree to and feel vindicated.

So my impression of mediators is they are a little like middle-men. What happens at mediation doesn't always end at mediation. They are just there to try and end the hostilities and it plays out as it will.

So mediation is a wildcard.

yeah, this is why funi had to shut down their unsubscribe button twice. It definitively didnt hurt them. NONONO. Their unsub button just happened to bug out, twice.

There is enough wrong with Funimation for everyone to dislike them. This lawsuit is the cherry on top of the mess.
 
Even Nick said in one of his shows that he respects Popehat as a lawyer. I have no idea what he does either. I think it's free speech stuff. He suffers from severe TDS though.
The ABA is infested.

Over the summer, they considered a motion to advise all courts to redefine sexual assault in the following way:

"Urges legislatures and courts to define consent in sexual assault cases as the assent of a person who is competent to give consent to engage in a specific act of sexual penetration, oral sex, or sexual contact, to provide that consent is expressed by words or action in the context of all the circumstances, and to reject any requirement that sexual assault victims have a legal burden of verbal or physical resistance."

While the motion was postponed indefinitely, it sought to allow accusers to remove consent retroactively.

This same motion is brought up every year by the same 2 SJW attorneys, the NCAJ objects, and it gets voted down.


 
View attachment 945970

The comments on this are hilarious. It's a deluge of "can't wait for ISWV to call the bar biased hurr hurr" responses, with just about zero of that type of response in the comments. How do they manage to be wrong about everything ? The ABA is biased, but that's mostly unimportant. It's mostly unimportant, because what they think of the case has absolutely zero impact, despite how much these people think it does. They talk over and over about how much it must suck to be Percy right now, despite it having zero impact at all on 1) his base of clientele and 2) the outcome of this case or any of his other cases.

We've also got people in the comments talking about how Ty is gonna get totes owned by TX bar complaints soon:



I'm sure Thiccy Greg will be the one to finally take down the evil duo of Percy and Screech, by doing the exact same thing that a shitload of other retards have already done to them. I'm sure it'll finally work this time!
 
The ABA is infested.

Over the summer, they considered a motion to advise all courts to redefine sexual assault in the following way:

"Urges legislatures and courts to define consent in sexual assault cases as the assent of a person who is competent to give consent to engage in a specific act of sexual penetration, oral sex, or sexual contact, to provide that consent is expressed by words or action in the context of all the circumstances, and to reject any requirement that sexual assault victims have a legal burden of verbal or physical resistance."

While the motion was postponed indefinitely, it sought to allow accusers to remove consent retroactively.

This same motion is brought up every year by the same 2 SJW attorneys, the NCAJ objects, and it gets voted down.


Porn and M rated fics and doujins are the future.
 
The comments on this are hilarious. It's a deluge of "can't wait for ISWV to call the bar biased hurr hurr" responses, with just about zero of that type of response in the comments. How do they manage to be wrong about everything ? The ABA is biased, but that's mostly unimportant. It's mostly unimportant, because what they think of the case has absolutely zero impact, despite how much these people think it does. They talk over and over about how much it must suck to be Percy right now, despite it having zero impact at all on 1) his base of clientele and 2) the outcome of this case or any of his other cases.

We've also got people in the comments talking about how Ty is gonna get totes owned by TX bar complaints soon:



I'm sure Thiccy Greg will be the one to finally take down the evil duo of Percy and Screech, by doing the exact same thing that a shitload of other exceptional individuals have already done to them. I'm sure it'll finally work this time!
God, Terez has a punchable Avatar. Also, what complaints could Greg or any of his buddies possibly have?
 
The comments on this are hilarious. It's a deluge of "can't wait for ISWV to call the bar biased hurr hurr" responses, with just about zero of that type of response in the comments. How do they manage to be wrong about everything ? The ABA is biased, but that's mostly unimportant. It's mostly unimportant, because what they think of the case has absolutely zero impact, despite how much these people think it does. They talk over and over about how much it must suck to be Percy right now, despite it having zero impact at all on 1) his base of clientele and 2) the outcome of this case or any of his other cases.

We've also got people in the comments talking about how Ty is gonna get totes owned by TX bar complaints soon:



I'm sure Thiccy Greg will be the one to finally take down the evil duo of Percy and Screech, by doing the exact same thing that a shitload of other exceptional individuals have already done to them. I'm sure it'll finally work this time!

This just goes to show how completely disconnected from education these screeching tusken raiders are.

The ABA is literally just a voluntary membership. It has no authority over lawyers, nor is it associated with any states. So submitting "bar complaints" to the ABA is akin to complaining to the BBB about how that Denny's overcooked your breakfast. It means absolutely nothing.

I don't even think Nick or Ty are even part of the ABA. So, even LESS of a relevant factor. This is just clearly a virtue signal to get more people associated with Law Twitter to join up, because you have to pay for it

1569260495627.png
 
God, Terez has a punchable Avatar. Also, what complaints could Greg or any of his buddies possibly have?

I'm sure it'll be some conspiracy theory nonsense about the GFM along with claims of targeted harassment and some form of a complaint about the "MUH FRAUD ON DA COURT" regarding the affidavits which there isn't even a reasonable suspicion of having occurred, considering the fact that you must show that the accused party 1) knowingly lied to the court 2) that the lie was intended to make the other party act on faulty information 3) that acting on this faulty information lead to their detriment or would have lead to their detriment. The fraud must be a lie, must be intended to cause harm, and must cause harm.
 
God, Terez has a punchable Avatar. Also, what complaints could Greg or any of his buddies possibly have?

What gets me about Greg is he can't claim any damages because you can't break something that was already beyond repair. All he can do is cry about mean twitter people he's already chain-blocked.
 
Two days of quiet and I wake up to the ABA starting to sputter and sperg. That's a fantastic level of stupid to come after a peaceful weekend. KickVic is cheering on the water boy's parents instead of the players. This is two levels of disconnected. :story:
 
Back